Joint Measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering, and Bell Nonlocality

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.6976v4
• Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 18:03:22 GMT
• Title: Joint Measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering, and Bell Nonlocality
• Authors: Marco T\'ulio Quintino, Tam\'as V\'ertesi, Nicolas Brunner
• Abstract summary: We show that any set of measurements not jointly measurable can be used for demonstrating quantum nonlocality. We also discuss the connection between Bell nonlocality and joint measurability, and give evidence that both notions are inequivalent.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We investigate the relation between the incompatibility of quantum measurements and quantum nonlocality. We show that any set of measurements that is not jointly measurable (i.e. incompatible) can be used for demonstrating EPR steering, a form of quantum nonlocality. This implies that EPR steering and (non) joint measurability can be viewed as equivalent. Moreover, we discuss the connection between Bell nonlocality and joint measurability, and give evidence that both notions are inequivalent. Specifically, we exhibit a set of incompatible quantum measurements and show that it does not violate a large class of Bell inequalities. This suggest the existence of incompatible quantum measurements which are Bell local, similarly to certain entangled states which admit a local hidden variable model.

Related papers

• All incompatible measurements on qubits lead to multiparticle Bell nonlocality [0.6827423171182154]
  We prove that any set of incompatible measurements on qubits leads to a violation of a suitable Bell inequality in a multiparticle scenario. Our results imply that measurement incompatibility for qubits can always be certified in a device-independent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T14:09:24Z)
• Measurement-Device-Independent Detection of Beyond-Quantum State [53.64687146666141]
  We propose a measurement-device-independent (MDI) test for beyond-quantum state detection. We discuss the importance of tomographic completeness of the input sets to the detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T06:40:13Z)
• Enhanced Entanglement in the Measurement-Altered Quantum Ising Chain [46.99825956909532]
  Local quantum measurements do not simply disentangle degrees of freedom, but may actually strengthen the entanglement in the system. This paper explores how a finite density of local measurement modifies a given state's entanglement structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T09:51:00Z)
• Measurement incompatibility is strictly stronger than disturbance [44.99833362998488]
  Heisenberg argued that measurements irreversibly alter the state of the system on which they are acting, causing an irreducible disturbance on subsequent measurements. This article shows that measurement incompatibility is indeed a sufficient condition for irreversibility of measurement disturbance. However, we exhibit a toy theory, termed the minimal classical theory (MCT), that is a counterexample for the converse implication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T13:47:00Z)
• Bell inequalities with overlapping measurements [52.81011822909395]
  We study Bell inequalities where measurements of different parties can have overlap. This allows to accommodate problems in quantum information. The scenarios considered show an interesting behaviour with respect to Hilbert space dimension, overlap, and symmetry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T18:11:05Z)
• Detection of Beyond-Quantum Non-locality based on Standard Local Quantum Observables [46.03321798937856]
  We show that device independent detection cannot distinguish beyond-quantum non-local states from standard quantum states. This paper gives a device dependent detection based on local observables to distinguish any beyond-quantum non-local state from all standard quantum states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-10T20:19:34Z)
• Quantum Bell nonlocality cannot be shared under a special kind of bilateral measurements for high-dimensional quantum states [0.0]
  We consider the shareability of quantum Bell nonlocality under bilateral measurements. Under a specific class of projection operators, we find that quantum Bell nonlocality cannot be shared for a limited number of times.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T03:39:43Z)
• Bipartite mixed states as quantum teleportation channels studied under coherent and incoherent basis [0.0]
  We show that the right choice of basis to be used to estimate coherence is the separable basis. We compute the entanglement and quantum coherence in the two qubit mixed states prepared using the Bell states and one of the state from the computational basis. We then calculate the teleportation of these mixed states and find the regions where the states have a fidelity greater than the classical teleportation fidelity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T10:40:49Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Qualitative equivalence between incompatibility and Bell nonlocality [0.0]
  Measurements in quantum theory can fail to be jointly measurable. Incompatibility of measurements is necessary but not sufficient for violating Bell inequalities. We show that a non-trivial joint measurability structure is not only necessary for a Bell violation, but also sufficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-23T20:02:01Z)
• Are Bell-tests only about local incompatibility? [0.0]
  Quantum non-locality remains a necessary concept to properly interpret the outcomes of certain joint quantum measurements. Bell-tests would only be about local incompatibility of quantum observables and quantum non-locality would be an unnecessary concept in physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T15:59:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.