How to (Un-) Quantum Mechanics
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.06981v2
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 16:41:54 GMT
- Title: How to (Un-) Quantum Mechanics
- Authors: C. Baumgarten,
- Abstract summary: Hamiltonian formulation of classical mechanics is based on abstract coordinates and momenta: It is a mathematical rather than a philosophical framework.<n>It is shown that a spatial-temporal description is not a condition for but a consequence of objectivity.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: When compared to quantum mechanics, classical mechanics is often depicted in a specific metaphysical flavour: spatio-temporal realism or a Newtonian "background" is presented as an intrinsic fundamental classical presumption. However, the Hamiltonian formulation of classical analytical mechanics is based on abstract generalized coordinates and momenta: It is a mathematical rather than a philosophical framework. If the metaphysical assumptions ascribed to classical mechanics are dropped, then there exists a presentation in which little of the purported difference between quantum and classical mechanics remains. This presentation allows to derive the mathematics of relativistic quantum mechanics on the basis of a purely classical Hamiltonian phase space picture. It is shown that a spatio-temporal description is not a condition for but a consequence of objectivity. It requires no postulates. This is achieved by evading spatial notions and assuming nothing but time translation invariance.
Related papers
- Observation of Quantum Darwinism and the Origin of Classicality with Superconducting Circuits [9.09683951826704]
How can we rationalize everyday classical observations from an inherently quantum world?<n>Quantum Darwinism offers a compelling framework to explain this emergence of classicality.<n>We observe the highly structured branching quantum states that support classicality and the saturation of quantum mutual information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-01T13:33:32Z) - Quantum and classical symmetries [0.0]
We suggest a somewhat non-standard view on a set of curious, paradoxical from the standpoint of simple classical physics.
We follow these analogies with the examples of relatively simple and well known models of classical physics.
This text can be considered as a mini-course addressed to higher school and undergraduate students who are interested in basics of quantum mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T14:45:42Z) - An ontological description for relativistic, massive bosons [0.0]
Locality holds for the quantum theory, and seems to be fully obeyed also by the classical treatment.
We do discuss extensively the distinction between the quantum treatment and the classical one, even though they produce exactly the same equations mathematically.
It is suggested to apply this theory for real time quantum model simulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-16T14:53:02Z) - Correspondence Between the Energy Equipartition Theorem in Classical
Mechanics and its Phase-Space Formulation in Quantum Mechanics [62.997667081978825]
In quantum mechanics, the energy per degree of freedom is not equally distributed.
We show that in the high-temperature regime, the classical result is recovered.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-24T20:51:03Z) - A Machian reformulation of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
We reformulate the Schr"odinger equation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics in a fully Machian way.
Just like its classical counterpart, the resulting quantum theory is fully relational in the positions and momenta of the bodies comprising a given physical system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-23T15:18:04Z) - There is only one time [110.83289076967895]
We draw a picture of physical systems that allows us to recognize what is this thing called "time"
We derive the Schr"odinger equation in the first case, and the Hamilton equations of motion in the second one.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T09:54:46Z) - Deterministic Quantum Mechanics: the Mathematical Equations [0.0]
We write down the conditions for the Hamiltonian of a quantum system for rendering it mathematically equivalent to a deterministic system.
Various examples are worked out, followed by a systematic procedure to generate classical evolution laws and quantum Hamiltonians that are exactly equivalent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-13T15:35:14Z) - Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe [68.8204255655161]
Three notions are often assumed to be essentially equivalent, representing different facets of the same phenomenon.
We analyze them in general Friedmann-Lemaitre- Robertson-Walker space-times through the lens of geometric structures on the classical phase space.
The analysis shows that: (i) inflation does not play an essential role; classical behavior can emerge much more generally; (ii) the three notions are conceptually distinct; classicality can emerge in one sense but not in another.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-22T16:38:25Z) - From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover.
The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z) - Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality.
This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment.
It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z) - Bell's theorem for trajectories [62.997667081978825]
A trajectory is not an outcome of a quantum measurement, in the sense that there is no observable associated with it.
We show how to overcome this problem by considering a special case of our generic inequality that can be experimentally tested point-by-point in time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-03T01:40:44Z) - A postquantum theory of classical gravity? [0.0]
We present an alternative approach by constructing a consistent theory of classical gravity coupled to quantum field theory.
The dynamics doesn't suffer from the pathologies of the semiclassical theory based on expectation values.
One can view the classical-quantum theory as fundamental or as an effective theory useful for computing the backreaction of quantum fields on geometry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2018-11-07T19:10:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.