Decentralization in Digital Societies -- A Design Paradox

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.01511v1
• Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 12:10:59 GMT
• Title: Decentralization in Digital Societies -- A Design Paradox
• Authors: Evangelos Pournaras
• Abstract summary: Digital societies come with a design paradox. On the one hand, technologies allow a distributed local intelligence in interconnected devices of our everyday life. On the other hand, Big Data collection and storage is managed in a highly centralized fashion.
• Score: 3.3504365823045044
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Digital societies come with a design paradox: On the one hand, technologies, such as Internet of Things, pervasive and ubiquitous systems, allow a distributed local intelligence in interconnected devices of our everyday life such as smart phones, smart thermostats, self-driving cars, etc. On the other hand, Big Data collection and storage is managed in a highly centralized fashion, resulting in privacy-intrusion, surveillance actions, discriminatory and segregation social phenomena. What is the difference between a distributed and a decentralized system design? How "decentralized" is the processing of our data nowadays? Does centralized design undermine autonomy? Can the level of decentralization in the implemented technologies influence ethical and social dimensions, such as social justice? Can decentralization convey sustainability? Are there parallelisms between the decentralization of digital technology and the decentralization of urban development?

Related papers

• Decentralized Credential Status Management: A Paradigm Shift in Digital Trust [0.0]
  Public key infrastructures are essential for Internet security, ensuring robust certificate management and revocation mechanisms. The transition from centralized to decentralized systems presents challenges such as trust distribution and privacy-preserving credential management. This paper explores the evolution of certificate status management from centralized to decentralized frameworks, focusing on blockchain technology and advanced cryptography.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T13:17:56Z)
• Decentralized Social Networks and the Future of Free Speech Online [4.249974621573213]
  Decentralized social networks like Mastodon and BlueSky are trending topics that have drawn much attention and discussion in recent years. This article critically assesses the decentralization project's prospect for communications online. It uses normative theories of free speech to examine whether and how the decentralization design could facilitate users' freedom of expression online.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T04:18:53Z)
• IT Strategic alignment in the decentralized finance (DeFi): CBDC and digital currencies [49.1574468325115]
  Decentralized finance (DeFi) is a disruptive-based financial infrastructure. This paper seeks to answer two main questions 1) What are the common IT elements in the DeFi? And 2) How the elements to the IT strategic alignment in DeFi?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T10:19:20Z)
• Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
  Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities. Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy. This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z)
• Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in Practice [54.47385318258732]
  Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of entities towards a shared vision. In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research. Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how theses actually work in practice and to what extent they are effective in achieving their goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T01:30:03Z)
• SoK: A Stratified Approach to Blockchain Decentralization [6.66161432273916]
  We put forth a systematization of the current landscape with respect to decentralization. Our approach dissects blockchain systems into multiple layers, or strata, each possibly encapsulating multiple categories. We introduce a practical test, the "Minimum Decentralization Test" which can provide quick insights about the decentralization state of a blockchain system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T17:13:09Z)
• Decentralized nation, solving the web identity crisis [0.0]
  The web is at a critical stage of evolution and challenge, largely centered around its crisis of identity. To truly realize the benefits from innovation and technology, this crisis has to be resolved. We propose how artificial intelligence on blockchain can be used to generate a new class of identity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-03T01:02:24Z)
• Consensus Control for Decentralized Deep Learning [72.50487751271069]
  Decentralized training of deep learning models enables on-device learning over networks, as well as efficient scaling to large compute clusters. We show in theory that when the training consensus distance is lower than a critical quantity, decentralized training converges as fast as the centralized counterpart. Our empirical insights allow the principled design of better decentralized training schemes that mitigate the performance drop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-09T13:58:33Z)
• Decentralize the feedback infrastructure! [0.0]
  We advocate for the decentralization of the information and communication infrastructure. Key to this decentralization is the creation of standards enabling interoperability between data platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T12:02:08Z)
• Graph Neural Networks for Decentralized Controllers [171.6642679604005]
  Dynamical systems comprised of autonomous agents arise in many relevant problems such as robotics, smart grids, or smart cities. Optimal centralized controllers are readily available but face limitations in terms of scalability and practical implementation. We propose a framework using graph neural networks (GNNs) to learn decentralized controllers from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T13:51:18Z)
• Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Descent [85.15773446094576]
  We present an in-depth study towards the Byzantine resilience of decentralized learning systems. We propose UBAR, a novel algorithm to enhance decentralized learning with Byzantine Fault Tolerance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T05:11:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.