Related papers: SoK: A Stratified Approach to Blockchain Decentralization

SoK: A Stratified Approach to Blockchain Decentralization

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01291v3
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:50:53 GMT
Title: SoK: A Stratified Approach to Blockchain Decentralization
Authors: Christina Ovezik, Dimitris Karakostas, Aggelos Kiayias,
Abstract summary: We put forth a systematization of the current landscape with respect to decentralization. Our approach dissects blockchain systems into multiple layers, or strata, each possibly encapsulating multiple categories. We introduce a practical test, the "Minimum Decentralization Test" which can provide quick insights about the decentralization state of a blockchain system.
Score: 6.66161432273916
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: Decentralization has been touted as the principal security advantage which propelled blockchain systems at the forefront of developments in the financial technology space. Its exact semantics nevertheless remain highly contested and ambiguous, with proponents and critics disagreeing widely on the level of decentralization offered by existing systems. To address this, we put forth a systematization of the current landscape with respect to decentralization and we derive a methodology that can help direct future research towards defining and measuring decentralization. Our approach dissects blockchain systems into multiple layers, or strata, each possibly encapsulating multiple categories, and it enables a unified method for measuring decentralization in each one. Our layers are (1) hardware, (2) software, (3) network, (4) consensus, (5) economics ("tokenomics"), (6) client API, (7) governance, and (8) geography. Armed with this stratification, we examine for each layer which pertinent properties of distributed ledgers (safety, liveness, privacy, stability) can be at risk due to centralization and in what way. We also introduce a practical test, the "Minimum Decentralization Test" which can provide quick insights about the decentralization state of a blockchain system. To demonstrate how our stratified methodology can be used in practice, we apply it fully (layer by layer) to Bitcoin, and we provide examples of systems which comprise one or more "problematic" layers that cause them to fail the MDT. Our work highlights the challenges in measuring and achieving decentralization, and suggests various potential directions where future research is needed.

Related papers

SoK: Measuring Blockchain Decentralization [7.274273862904251]
In the context of blockchain systems, the importance of decentralization is undermined by the lack of a widely accepted methodology to measure it. We put forth a framework that categorizes all measurement techniques used in previous work based on the resource they target. We complement this framework with an empirical analysis designed to evaluate whether the various pre-processing steps and metrics used in prior work capture the same underlying concept of decentralization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-30T11:37:34Z)
Protocol Learning, Decentralized Frontier Risk and the No-Off Problem [56.74434512241989]
We identify a third paradigm - Protocol Learning - where models are trained across decentralized networks of incentivized participants. This approach has the potential to aggregate orders of magnitude more computational resources than any single centralized entity. It also introduces novel challenges: heterogeneous and unreliable nodes, malicious participants, the need for unextractable models to preserve incentives, and complex governance dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-10T19:53:50Z)
Quantifying the Blockchain Trilemma: A Comparative Analysis of Algorand, Ethereum 2.0, and Beyond [4.605490094506685]
This study evaluates and compares two leading proof-of-stake (PoS) systems, Algorand and 2.0. We analyze each platform's strategies in a structured manner to understand their effectiveness in addressing trilemma challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-19T14:15:29Z)
IT Strategic alignment in the decentralized finance (DeFi): CBDC and digital currencies [49.1574468325115]
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is a disruptive-based financial infrastructure. This paper seeks to answer two main questions 1) What are the common IT elements in the DeFi? And 2) How the elements to the IT strategic alignment in DeFi?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T10:19:20Z)
Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities. Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy. This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z)
Analyzing Reward Dynamics and Decentralization in Ethereum 2.0: An Advanced Data Engineering Workflow and Comprehensive Datasets for Proof-of-Stake Incentives [5.18461573800406]
Smart contract blockchain platform, Proof-of-Stake 2.0, guarantees precise execution of applications without third-party intervention. Our study collects consensus reward data from the Beacon chain and conducts a comprehensive analysis of reward distribution and evolution. To evaluate the degree of decentralization in PoS, we apply several inequality indices, including the Shannon entropy, the Gini Index, the Nakamoto Coefficient, and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T02:40:00Z)
Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in Practice [54.47385318258732]
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of entities towards a shared vision. In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research. Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how theses actually work in practice and to what extent they are effective in achieving their goals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-17T01:30:03Z)
SoK: Blockchain Governance [13.95507600720467]
The topic of blockchain governance is a fertile domain for a thorough systematization. We start by distilling a comprehensive array of properties for sound governance systems. While all properties are satisfied, even partially, by at least one system, no system that most of them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-18T18:38:26Z)
Taxonomy of Centralization in Public Blockchain Systems: A Systematic Literature Review [2.1315215140430683]
Bitcoin introduced delegation of control over a monetary system from a select few to all who participate in that system. This delegation is known as the decentralization of controlling power and is a powerful security mechanism for the ecosystem. Recent studies have observed a trend of increased centralization in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-26T08:58:48Z)
Demand-Side Scheduling Based on Multi-Agent Deep Actor-Critic Learning for Smart Grids [56.35173057183362]
We consider the problem of demand-side energy management, where each household is equipped with a smart meter that is able to schedule home appliances online. The goal is to minimize the overall cost under a real-time pricing scheme. We propose the formulation of a smart grid environment as a Markov game.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-05T07:32:40Z)
Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Descent [85.15773446094576]
We present an in-depth study towards the Byzantine resilience of decentralized learning systems. We propose UBAR, a novel algorithm to enhance decentralized learning with Byzantine Fault Tolerance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-20T05:11:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.