SoK: A Stratified Approach to Blockchain Decentralization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01291v3
• Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:50:53 GMT
• Title: SoK: A Stratified Approach to Blockchain Decentralization
• Authors: Christina Ovezik, Dimitris Karakostas, Aggelos Kiayias,
• Abstract summary: We put forth a systematization of the current landscape with respect to decentralization. Our approach dissects blockchain systems into multiple layers, or strata, each possibly encapsulating multiple categories. We introduce a practical test, the "Minimum Decentralization Test" which can provide quick insights about the decentralization state of a blockchain system.
• Score: 6.66161432273916
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Decentralization has been touted as the principal security advantage which propelled blockchain systems at the forefront of developments in the financial technology space. Its exact semantics nevertheless remain highly contested and ambiguous, with proponents and critics disagreeing widely on the level of decentralization offered by existing systems. To address this, we put forth a systematization of the current landscape with respect to decentralization and we derive a methodology that can help direct future research towards defining and measuring decentralization. Our approach dissects blockchain systems into multiple layers, or strata, each possibly encapsulating multiple categories, and it enables a unified method for measuring decentralization in each one. Our layers are (1) hardware, (2) software, (3) network, (4) consensus, (5) economics ("tokenomics"), (6) client API, (7) governance, and (8) geography. Armed with this stratification, we examine for each layer which pertinent properties of distributed ledgers (safety, liveness, privacy, stability) can be at risk due to centralization and in what way. We also introduce a practical test, the "Minimum Decentralization Test" which can provide quick insights about the decentralization state of a blockchain system. To demonstrate how our stratified methodology can be used in practice, we apply it fully (layer by layer) to Bitcoin, and we provide examples of systems which comprise one or more "problematic" layers that cause them to fail the MDT. Our work highlights the challenges in measuring and achieving decentralization, and suggests various potential directions where future research is needed.

Related papers

• Quantifying the Blockchain Trilemma: A Comparative Analysis of Algorand, Ethereum 2.0, and Beyond [4.605490094506685]
  This study evaluates and compares two leading proof-of-stake (PoS) systems, Algorand and 2.0. We analyze each platform's strategies in a structured manner to understand their effectiveness in addressing trilemma challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T14:15:29Z)
• MEV Ecosystem Evolution From Ethereum 1.0 [6.151915040556504]
  In traditional finance, there are possibilities to create values, e.g., arbitrage offers to create value from market inefficiencies or front-running offers to extract value for the participants having privileged roles. Such opportunities are readily available in DeFi ecosystems, where diverse participants engage in financial activities. In this survey, first, we show how lucrative such opportunities can be. Then, we discuss how protocolfollowing participants trying to capture such opportunities threaten to sabotage blockchain's performance. Finally, we review the current state of research trying to restore trustlessness and decentralization to provide all DeFi participants with a fair marketplace
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T14:22:26Z)
• IT Strategic alignment in the decentralized finance (DeFi): CBDC and digital currencies [49.1574468325115]
  Decentralized finance (DeFi) is a disruptive-based financial infrastructure. This paper seeks to answer two main questions 1) What are the common IT elements in the DeFi? And 2) How the elements to the IT strategic alignment in DeFi?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T10:19:20Z)
• Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
  Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities. Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy. This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z)
• Analyzing Reward Dynamics and Decentralization in Ethereum 2.0: An Advanced Data Engineering Workflow and Comprehensive Datasets for Proof-of-Stake Incentives [5.18461573800406]
  Smart contract blockchain platform, Proof-of-Stake 2.0, guarantees precise execution of applications without third-party intervention. Our study collects consensus reward data from the Beacon chain and conducts a comprehensive analysis of reward distribution and evolution. To evaluate the degree of decentralization in PoS, we apply several inequality indices, including the Shannon entropy, the Gini Index, the Nakamoto Coefficient, and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T02:40:00Z)
• Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in Practice [54.47385318258732]
  Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of entities towards a shared vision. In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research. Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how theses actually work in practice and to what extent they are effective in achieving their goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T01:30:03Z)
• SoK: Blockchain Governance [13.95507600720467]
  The topic of blockchain governance is a fertile domain for a thorough systematization. We start by distilling a comprehensive array of properties for sound governance systems. While all properties are satisfied, even partially, by at least one system, no system that most of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T18:38:26Z)
• Taxonomy of Centralization in Public Blockchain Systems: A Systematic Literature Review [2.1315215140430683]
  Bitcoin introduced delegation of control over a monetary system from a select few to all who participate in that system. This delegation is known as the decentralization of controlling power and is a powerful security mechanism for the ecosystem. Recent studies have observed a trend of increased centralization in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T08:58:48Z)
• Demand-Side Scheduling Based on Multi-Agent Deep Actor-Critic Learning for Smart Grids [56.35173057183362]
  We consider the problem of demand-side energy management, where each household is equipped with a smart meter that is able to schedule home appliances online. The goal is to minimize the overall cost under a real-time pricing scheme. We propose the formulation of a smart grid environment as a Markov game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-05T07:32:40Z)
• F2A2: Flexible Fully-decentralized Approximate Actor-critic for Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [110.35516334788687]
  Decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms are sometimes unpractical in complicated applications. We propose a flexible fully decentralized actor-critic MARL framework, which can handle large-scale general cooperative multi-agent setting. Our framework can achieve scalability and stability for large-scale environment and reduce information transmission.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-17T14:56:29Z)
• Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Descent [85.15773446094576]
  We present an in-depth study towards the Byzantine resilience of decentralized learning systems. We propose UBAR, a novel algorithm to enhance decentralized learning with Byzantine Fault Tolerance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T05:11:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.