Four Principles of Explainable AI as Applied to Biometrics and Facial Forensic Algorithms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01014v1
• Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 21:03:20 GMT
• Title: Four Principles of Explainable AI as Applied to Biometrics and Facial Forensic Algorithms
• Authors: P. Jonathon Phillips and Mark Przybocki
• Abstract summary: We focus on adapting explainable AI to face recognition and biometrics. Case studies show the challenges and issues in developing algorithms that can produce explanations.
• Score: 0.38073142980732994
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Traditionally, researchers in automatic face recognition and biometric technologies have focused on developing accurate algorithms. With this technology being integrated into operational systems, engineers and scientists are being asked, do these systems meet societal norms? The origin of this line of inquiry is `trust' of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. In this paper, we concentrate on adapting explainable AI to face recognition and biometrics, and we present four principles of explainable AI to face recognition and biometrics. The principles are illustrated by $\it{four}$ case studies, which show the challenges and issues in developing algorithms that can produce explanations.

Related papers

• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)-Native Wireless Systems: A Journey Beyond 6G [58.440115433585824]
  Building future wireless systems that support services like digital twins (DTs) is challenging to achieve through advances to conventional technologies like meta-surfaces. While artificial intelligence (AI)-native networks promise to overcome some limitations of wireless technologies, developments still rely on AI tools like neural networks. This paper revisits the concept of AI-native wireless systems, equipping them with the common sense necessary to transform them into artificial general intelligence (AGI)-native systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T04:51:05Z)
• Brain-Inspired Computational Intelligence via Predictive Coding [89.6335791546526]
  Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks. PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for Science in Quantum, Atomistic, and Continuum Systems [268.585904751315]
  New area of research known as AI for science (AI4Science) Areas aim at understanding the physical world from subatomic (wavefunctions and electron density), atomic (molecules, proteins, materials, and interactions), to macro (fluids, climate, and subsurface) scales. Key common challenge is how to capture physics first principles, especially symmetries, in natural systems by deep learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T12:14:14Z)
• Mathematics, word problems, common sense, and artificial intelligence [0.0]
  We discuss the capacities and limitations of current artificial intelligence (AI) technology to solve word problems that combine elementary knowledge with commonsense reasoning. We review three approaches that have been developed, using AI natural language technology. We argue that it is not clear whether these kinds of limitations will be important in developing AI technology for pure mathematical research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-23T21:21:39Z)
• An Initial Look at Self-Reprogramming Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  We develop and experimentally validate the first fully self-reprogramming AI system. Applying AI-based computer code generation to AI itself, we implement an algorithm with the ability to continuously modify and rewrite its own neural network source code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T05:44:34Z)
• AI-Assisted Authentication: State of the Art, Taxonomy and Future Roadmap [0.0]
  This paper focuses on the applications of artificial intelligence in authentication. With the emerging AI-assisted authentication schemes, our survey provides an overall understanding on a high level. In contrast to other relevant surveys, our research is the first of its kind to focus on the roles of AI in authentication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T21:16:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Emerging Biometrics: Deep Inference and Other Computational Intelligence [1.2922946578413577]
  Biometric-enabled systems are evolving towards deep learning and deep inference. We highlight the technology gaps that must be addressed in future generations of biometric systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T02:35:00Z)
• Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challenge [0.0]
  Biometric systems rely on the uniqueness of certain biological or forensics characteristics of human beings. There has been a wave of public and academic concerns regarding the existence of systemic bias in automated decision systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-05T09:07:59Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.