Unitary-Only Quantum Theory Cannot Consistently Describe the Use of Itself: On the Frauchiger-Renner Paradox

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01456v2
• Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 23:15:40 GMT
• Title: Unitary-Only Quantum Theory Cannot Consistently Describe the Use of Itself: On the Frauchiger-Renner Paradox
• Authors: R. E. Kastner
• Abstract summary: The Frauchiger-Renner Paradox is an extension of paradoxes based on the 'Problem of Measurement,' such as Schrodinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend. This paper discusses a basic inconsistency arising in the FR scenario at a much earlier point than the derived contradiction.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Frauchiger-Renner Paradox is an extension of paradoxes based on the 'Problem of Measurement,' such as Schrodinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend. All of these paradoxes stem from assuming that quantum theory has only unitary (linear) physical dynamics, and the attendant ambiguity about what counts as a 'measurement'--i.e., the inability to account for the observation of determinate measurement outcomes from within the theory itself. This paper discusses a basic inconsistency arising in the FR scenario at a much earlier point than the derived contradiction: namely, the inconsistency inherent in treating an improper mixture (reduced density operator) as a proper, epistemic mixture. This is an illegitimate procedure that is nevertheless endemic if quantum theory is assumed to be always unitary. In contrast, under a non-unitary account of quantum state reduction yielding determinate outcomes, the use of a proper mixture for measurement results becomes legitimate, and this entire class of paradoxes cannot be mounted. The conclusion is that the real lesson of the FR paradox is that it is the unitary-only assumption that needs to be critically reassessed.

Related papers

• A refined Frauchiger--Renner paradox based on strong contextuality [0.0]
  We observe that logical contextuality is the key ingredient of the FR paradox. We propose a natural extension of Peres's dictum to resolve these extended Wigner's friend paradoxes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T10:36:47Z)
• Conventional Quantum Theory Does Not Support A Coherent Relational Account [0.0]
  Quantum theory in conventional formulation is notoriously subject to various measurement-related paradoxes. Inconsistencies concerning the outcomes of measurements can be revealed among observers. implications for the debate concerning the viability of quantum theory in its various formulations are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T05:35:32Z)
• Testing trajectory-based determinism via time probability distributions [44.99833362998488]
  Bohmian mechanics (BM) has inherited more predictive power than quantum mechanics (QM) We introduce a prescription for constructing a flight-time probability distribution within generic trajectory-equipped theories. We derive probability distributions that are unreachable by QM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T11:36:38Z)
• Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory [69.62715388742298]
  Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics. We show how a de Finetti-like representation theorem for finitely exchangeable sequences requires a mathematical representation which is formally equivalent to quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T17:15:19Z)
• Measurement incompatibility is strictly stronger than disturbance [44.99833362998488]
  Heisenberg argued that measurements irreversibly alter the state of the system on which they are acting, causing an irreducible disturbance on subsequent measurements. This article shows that measurement incompatibility is indeed a sufficient condition for irreversibility of measurement disturbance. However, we exhibit a toy theory, termed the minimal classical theory (MCT), that is a counterexample for the converse implication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T13:47:00Z)
• A theory of quantum (statistical) measurement [0.0]
  We propose a theory of quantum (statistical) measurement which is close, in spirit, to Hepp's theory. We make a three-fold assumption: the measurement is not instantaneous, it lasts a finite amount of time and is, up to arbitrary accuracy, performed in a finite region of space. The fact that no irreversibility is attached to the process of measurement is shown to follow from the author's theory of irreversibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T16:56:37Z)
• Events in quantum mechanics are maximally non-absolute [0.9176056742068814]
  We prove that quantum correlations can be maximally non-absolute according to both quantifiers. We show that chained Bell inequalities (and relaxations thereof) are also valid constraints for Wigner's experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-19T21:15:16Z)
• The Smoothed Likelihood of Doctrinal Paradox [34.534516291695155]
  We show that under mild conditions, the smoothed likelihood of the doctrinal paradox is either $0$, $exp(-Theta(n))$, $Theta(n-1/2)$ or $Theta(1)$. Our main theorem states that under mild conditions, the smoothed likelihood of the doctrinal paradox is either $0$, $exp(-Theta(n))$, $Theta(n-1/2)$ or $Theta(1)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-11T15:55:47Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Bell's theorem for trajectories [62.997667081978825]
  A trajectory is not an outcome of a quantum measurement, in the sense that there is no observable associated with it. We show how to overcome this problem by considering a special case of our generic inequality that can be experimentally tested point-by-point in time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-03T01:40:44Z)
• A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox [0.0]
  We prove that if quantum evolution is controllable on the scale of an observer, then one of 'No-Superdeterminism', 'Locality' or 'Absoluteness of Observed Events' must be false. We show that although the violation of Bell-type inequalities in such scenarios is not in general sufficient to demonstrate the contradiction between those three assumptions, new inequalities can be derived in a theory-independent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-12T08:09:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.