A machine-learning software-systems approach to capture social, regulatory, governance, and climate problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11485v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 13:00:52 GMT
• Title: A machine-learning software-systems approach to capture social, regulatory, governance, and climate problems
• Authors: Christopher A. Tucker
• Abstract summary: It will discuss the role of an artificially-intelligent computer system as critique-based, implicit-organizational, and an inherently necessary device, deployed in synchrony with parallel governmental policy, as a genuine means of capturing nation-population in quantitative form, public contentment in societal-cooperative economic groups, regulatory proposition, and governance-effectiveness domains.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper will discuss the role of an artificially-intelligent computer system as critique-based, implicit-organizational, and an inherently necessary device, deployed in synchrony with parallel governmental policy, as a genuine means of capturing nation-population complexity in quantitative form, public contentment in societal-cooperative economic groups, regulatory proposition, and governance-effectiveness domains. It will discuss a solution involving a well-known algorithm and proffer an improved mechanism for knowledge-representation, thereby increasing range of utility, scope of influence (in terms of differentiating class sectors) and operational efficiency. It will finish with a discussion of these and other historical implications.

Related papers

• Pluralism in AI Governance: Toward Sociotechnical Alignment and Normative Coherence [0.16921396880325779]
  The study synthesises frameworks including Full-Stack Alignment, Thick Models of Value, Value Sensitive Design, and Public Constitutional AI.<n>It introduces a layered framework linking values, mechanisms, and strategies, and maps tensions such as fairness versus efficiency, transparency versus security, and privacy versus equity.<n>The study contributes a holistic, value-sensitive model of AI governance, reframing regulation as a proactive mechanism for embedding public values into sociotechnical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T14:28:56Z)
• Methods and Open Problems in Differentiable Social Choice: Learning Mechanisms, Decisions, and Alignment [7.764532811300023]
  Social choice is no longer a peripheral concern of political theory or economics.<n>This Review surveys differentiable social choice: an emerging paradigm that formulates voting rules, mechanisms, and aggregation procedures as learnable, differentiable models optimized from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T02:17:16Z)
• The Social Responsibility Stack: A Control-Theoretic Architecture for Governing Socio-Technical AI [0.0]
  This paper introduces the Social Responsibility Stack (SRS), a framework that embeds societal values into AI systems.<n>We show how SRS translates normative objectives into actionable engineering and operational controls.<n>The framework bridges ethics, control theory, and AI governance, providing a practical foundation for accountable, adaptive, and auditable socio-technical AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T18:42:16Z)
• LLM-empowered Agents Simulation Framework for Scenario Generation in Service Ecosystem Governance [45.203064499446775]
  We propose a scenario generator design method, which adaptively coordinates three Large Language Model (LLM) empowered agents.<n>The Environment Agent (EA) generates social environment including extremes, the Social Agent (SA) generates social collaboration structure, and the Planner Agent (PA) couples task-role relationships and plans task solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T12:55:02Z)
• Secondary Bounded Rationality: A Theory of How Algorithms Reproduce Structural Inequality in AI Hiring [0.174048653626208]
  Article argues that AI systems inherit and amplify human cognitive and structural biases through technical and sociopolitical constraints.<n>We show how algorithmic processes transform historical inequalities, such as elite credential privileging and network homophily, into ostensibly meritocratic outcomes.<n>We propose mitigation strategies, including counterfactual fairness testing, capital-aware auditing, and regulatory interventions, to disrupt this self-reinforcing inequality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T10:03:20Z)
• Bridging Prediction and Intervention Problems in Social Systems [71.41519966787386]
  We consider the ways in which we must shift from a prediction-focused paradigm to an interventionist paradigm when considering the impact of automated decision systems (ADS)<n>We argue this requires a new default problem setup for ADS beyond prediction, to instead consider predictions as decision support, final decisions, and outcomes.<n>We highlight how this perspective unifies modern statistical frameworks and other tools to study the design, implementation, and evaluation of ADS systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T17:29:13Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems. Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• The Algorithmic State Architecture (ASA): An Integrated Framework for AI-Enabled Government [1.7965567343825297]
  This paper introduces the Algorithmic State Architecture (ASA) It conceptualises how Digital Public Infrastructure, Data-for-Policy, Algorithmic Government/Governance, and GovTech interact as an integrated system in AI-enabled states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T00:20:56Z)
• AI and the Transformation of Accountability and Discretion in Urban Governance [1.9152655229960793]
  The study synthesizes insights to propose guiding principles for responsible AI integration in decision-making processes. The analysis argues that AI does not simply restrict or enhance discretion but redistributes it across institutional levels. It may simultaneously strengthen managerial oversight, enhance decision-making consistency, and improve operational efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T18:11:39Z)
• Fair Enough? A map of the current limitations of the requirements to have fair algorithms [43.609606707879365]
  We argue that there is a hiatus between what the society is demanding from Automated Decision-Making systems, and what this demand actually means in real-world scenarios. We outline the key features of such a hiatus and pinpoint a set of crucial open points that we as a society must address in order to give a concrete meaning to the increasing demand of fairness in Automated Decision-Making systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T08:44:38Z)
• Regulation and NLP (RegNLP): Taming Large Language Models [51.41095330188972]
  We argue how NLP research can benefit from proximity to regulatory studies and adjacent fields. We advocate for the development of a new multidisciplinary research space on regulation and NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T09:22:40Z)
• Solving NLP Problems through Human-System Collaboration: A Discussion-based Approach [98.13835740351932]
  This research aims to create a dataset and computational framework for systems that discuss and refine their predictions through dialogue. We show that the proposed system can have beneficial discussions with humans improving the accuracy by up to 25 points in the natural language inference task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T16:24:50Z)
• Algorithms as Social-Ecological-Technological Systems: an Environmental Justice Lens on Algorithmic Audits [0.5076419064097732]
  This paper reframes algorithmic systems as intimately connected to and part of social and ecological systems. We propose a first-of-its-kind methodology for environmental justice-oriented algorithmic audits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T19:25:25Z)
• Social Influence Dialogue Systems: A Scoping Survey of the Efforts Towards Influence Capabilities of Dialogue Systems [50.57882213439553]
  Social influence dialogue systems are capable of persuasion, negotiation, and therapy. There exists no formal definition or category for dialogue systems with these skills. This study serves as a comprehensive reference for social influence dialogue systems to inspire more dedicated research and discussion in this emerging area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T17:57:23Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Political Propagation of Social Botnets: Policy Consequences [0.0]
  The 2016 US election was a watershed event where an electoral intervention by an adversarial state made extensive use of software robots and data driven communications. We reflect upon the policy consequences of the use of Social Botnets and understand the impact of their adversarial operation. For future work, it is important to understand the agency and collective properties of these software robots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-10T12:08:03Z)
• Accountability in an Algorithmic Society: Relationality, Responsibility, and Robustness in Machine Learning [4.958893997693021]
  In 1996, Nissenbaum issued a clarion call concerning the erosion of accountability in society due to the ubiquitous delegation of consequential functions to computerized systems. We revisit Nissenbaum's original paper in relation to the ascendance of data-driven algorithmic systems. We discuss how the barriers present difficulties for instantiating a unified moral, relational framework in practice for data-driven algorithmic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T21:39:02Z)
• Active Inference in Robotics and Artificial Agents: Survey and Challenges [51.29077770446286]
  We review the state-of-the-art theory and implementations of active inference for state-estimation, control, planning and learning. We showcase relevant experiments that illustrate its potential in terms of adaptation, generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T12:10:26Z)
• Machines and Influence [0.0]
  This paper surveys AI capabilities and tackles this very issue. We introduce a Matrix of Machine Influence to frame and navigate the adversarial applications of AI. We suggest that better regulation and management of information systems can more optimally offset the risks of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-26T08:58:09Z)
• Network control by a constrained external agent as a continuous optimization problem [0.0]
  We integrate optimisation tools from deep-learning with network science into a framework that is able to optimize such interventions in real-world networks. We demonstrate the framework in the context of corporate control, where it allows to characterize the vulnerability of strategically important corporate networks to sensitive takeovers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-23T17:21:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.