On Quantum Bayesianism

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.11022v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 01:20:25 GMT
• Title: On Quantum Bayesianism
• Authors: Moses Fayngold
• Abstract summary: This article presents analysis of some aspects of QBism. The main quantum mechanical conundrum of measurement and the observer is, contrary to the claims, not resolved within the framework of QBism.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The lately developed part of Quantum Bayesianism named QBism has been proclaimed by its authors a powerful interpretation of Quantum Physics. This article presents analysis of some aspects of QBism. The considered examples show inconsistencies in some basic statements of the discussed interpretation. In particular, the main quantum mechanical conundrum of measurement and the observer is, contrary to the claims, not resolved within the framework of QBism. The conclusion is made that the basic tenets of QBism as applied in Physics are unsubstantiated.

Related papers

• Quantum Probabilities Are Objective Degrees of Epistemic Justification [0.0]
  QBism is one of the most widely discussed'subjective' interpretations of quantum mechanics. This paper takes QBism as a starting point, but allows objectivity to enter from the get-go.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T22:07:34Z)
• BI-based Reasoning about Quantum Programs with Heap Manipulations [5.744265100221585]
  We provide well-founded semantics for a quantum programming language Qwhile-hp with heap manipulations. We develop a quantum BI-style logic that includes interpretations for separating implication. We then adopt this quantum BI-style logic as an assertion language to reason about heap-manipulated quantum programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T10:34:45Z)
• Relational Quantum Mechanics is Still Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We show that a central concept in Quantum Mechanics, are inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics. Our work has been criticized by Cavalcanti, Di Biagio, Rovelli (CDR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T09:34:17Z)
• Unraveling the Mystery of Quantum Measurement with A New Space-Time Approach to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics [9.116661570248171]
  Quantum measurement is a fundamental concept in the field of quantum mechanics. Despite its significance, four fundamental issues continue to pose significant challenges to the broader application of quantum measurement. We employ a new space-time approach to relativistic quantum mechanics to address these issues systematically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T13:25:08Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• QBism and Relational Quantum Mechanics compared [0.0]
  subjective Bayesian interpretation of quantum mechanics (QBism) and Rovelli's relational interpretation of quantum mechanics (RQM) are both notable for embracing the radical idea that measurement outcomes correspond to events whose occurrence (or not) is relative to an observer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-31T17:00:50Z)
• Impossibility of creating a superposition of unknown quantum states [16.467540842571328]
  We show that the existence of a protocol that superposes two unknown pure states with nonzero probability leads to violation of other no-go theorems. Such a protocol can be used to perform certain state discrimination and cloning tasks that are forbidden in quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T13:25:42Z)
• QBism Is Not So Simply Dismissed [0.0]
  We evaluate the plausibility of recent criticism of QBism. We focus on the consequences of the subjective character of the quantum state, the issue of realism and the problem of the evolution of the quantum state in QBism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T11:38:07Z)
• A Quantum G\"odelian Hunch [0.0]
  This essay aims at arguing for such G"odelian hunch via two case studies. The theological motivational origin of quantum contextuality is introduced in order to show how this result might be related to a Liar-like undecidability. A personal analysis of the related Wigner's friend thought experiment and and a recent paradox by Frauchiger and Renner is presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-07T11:22:20Z)
• The Uncertainty Principle of Quantum Processes [6.2997667081978825]
  We show that the uncertainty principle can be reformulated to include process-measurements that are performed on quantum channels. We obtain expressions that generalize the Maassen-Uffink uncertainty relation and the universal uncertainty relations from quantum states to quantum channels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-11T06:03:30Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.