Relational Quantum Mechanics is Still Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18008v2
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:14:09 GMT
- Title: Relational Quantum Mechanics is Still Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics
- Authors: Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz, Marek Żukowski,
- Abstract summary: We show that a central concept in Quantum Mechanics, are inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics.
Our work has been criticized by Cavalcanti, Di Biagio, Rovelli (CDR)
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We showed in a recent article (Lawrence et. al., 2023, Quantum 7, 1015), that relative facts (outcomes), a central concept in Relational Quantum Mechanics, are inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics. We proved this by constructing a Wigner-Friend type sequential measurement scenario on a Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state of three qubits, and making the following assumption: "if an interpretation of quantum theory introduces some conceptualization of outcomes of a measurement, then probabilities of these outcomes must follow the quantum predictions as given by the Born rule." Our work has been criticized by Cavalcanti, Di Biagio, and Rovelli (CDR). In this note we show that their critique is invalid, and that their specific arguments raise questions of principle.
Related papers
- Conventional Quantum Theory Does Not Support A Coherent Relational Account [0.0]
Quantum theory in conventional formulation is notoriously subject to various measurement-related paradoxes.
Inconsistencies concerning the outcomes of measurements can be revealed among observers.
implications for the debate concerning the viability of quantum theory in its various formulations are discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T05:35:32Z) - A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device.
Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z) - On Some Quantum Correction to the Coulomb Potential in Generalized Uncertainty Principle Approach [0.0]
We consider a modified Schr"odinger equation resulting from a generalized uncertainty principle.
As the resulting equation cannot be solved by common exact approaches, we propose a Bethe ansatz approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-07T12:07:35Z) - Quantumness and quantum to classical transition in the generalized Rabi
model [17.03191662568079]
We define the quantumness of a Hamiltonian by the free energy difference between its quantum and classical descriptions.
We show that the Jaynes-Cummings and anti Jaynes-Cummings models exhibit greater quantumness than the Rabi model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-12T18:24:36Z) - Understanding and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics [0.65268245109828]
De Regt's contextual theory of understanding argues that recognizing qualitatively characteristic consequences of a theory T without performing exact calculations is a criterion for scientific understanding.
If the task of understanding quantum mechanics has been finished already, there would be a conflict between the contextual theory of understanding of quantum mechanics and interpretations of quantum mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-25T10:59:30Z) - Relative Facts of Relational Quantum Mechanics are Incompatible with
Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
RQM measurement arise from interactions which entangle a system $$S and an observer $A$ without decoherence.
The criterion states that whenever an interpretation introduces a notion of outcomes, these outcomes must follow the probability distribution specified by the Born rule.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-24T23:15:00Z) - Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same.
Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles.
We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z) - Non-equilibrium stationary states of quantum non-Hermitian lattice
models [68.8204255655161]
We show how generic non-Hermitian tight-binding lattice models can be realized in an unconditional, quantum-mechanically consistent manner.
We focus on the quantum steady states of such models for both fermionic and bosonic systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-02T18:56:44Z) - Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality.
This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment.
It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z) - Quantum Statistical Complexity Measure as a Signalling of Correlation
Transitions [55.41644538483948]
We introduce a quantum version for the statistical complexity measure, in the context of quantum information theory, and use it as a signalling function of quantum order-disorder transitions.
We apply our measure to two exactly solvable Hamiltonian models, namely: the $1D$-Quantum Ising Model and the Heisenberg XXZ spin-$1/2$ chain.
We also compute this measure for one-qubit and two-qubit reduced states for the considered models, and analyse its behaviour across its quantum phase transitions for finite system sizes as well as in the thermodynamic limit by using Bethe ansatz.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-05T00:45:21Z) - The (Quantum) Measurement Problem in Classical Mechanics [0.0]
We show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta.
We discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and'measurement'
We show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-01T17:07:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.