An approximate KLD based experimental design for models with intractable likelihoods

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.00715v2
• Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:48:28 GMT
• Title: An approximate KLD based experimental design for models with intractable likelihoods
• Authors: Ziqiao Ao and Jinglai Li
• Abstract summary: In this work we consider a special type of statistical experimental design (ED) problems where the likelihoods are not available in a closed form. The popular information-theoretic Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) based design criterion can not be used directly, as it requires to evaluate the likelihood function. To address the issue, we derive a new utility function, which is a lower bound of the original KLD utility.
• Score: 1.8275108630751844
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Data collection is a critical step in statistical inference and data science, and the goal of statistical experimental design (ED) is to find the data collection setup that can provide most information for the inference. In this work we consider a special type of ED problems where the likelihoods are not available in a closed form. In this case, the popular information-theoretic Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) based design criterion can not be used directly, as it requires to evaluate the likelihood function. To address the issue, we derive a new utility function, which is a lower bound of the original KLD utility. This lower bound is expressed in terms of the summation of two or more entropies in the data space, and thus can be evaluated efficiently via entropy estimation methods. We provide several numerical examples to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method.

Related papers

• Estimating Causal Effects from Learned Causal Networks [56.14597641617531]
  We propose an alternative paradigm for answering causal-effect queries over discrete observable variables. We learn the causal Bayesian network and its confounding latent variables directly from the observational data. We show that this emphmodel completion learning approach can be more effective than estimand approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T08:39:09Z)
• Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods [59.779795063072655]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and its variants have gained popularity as effective methods for solving multi-step reasoning problems. We analyze CoT prompting from a statistical estimation perspective, providing a comprehensive characterization of its sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T04:07:18Z)
• Diffusion posterior sampling for simulation-based inference in tall data settings [53.17563688225137]
  Simulation-based inference ( SBI) is capable of approximating the posterior distribution that relates input parameters to a given observation. In this work, we consider a tall data extension in which multiple observations are available to better infer the parameters of the model. We compare our method to recently proposed competing approaches on various numerical experiments and demonstrate its superiority in terms of numerical stability and computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T09:23:36Z)
• Federated Causal Discovery from Heterogeneous Data [70.31070224690399]
  We propose a novel FCD method attempting to accommodate arbitrary causal models and heterogeneous data. These approaches involve constructing summary statistics as a proxy of the raw data to protect data privacy. We conduct extensive experiments on synthetic and real datasets to show the efficacy of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:53:53Z)
• Directed Cyclic Graph for Causal Discovery from Multivariate Functional Data [15.26007975367927]
  We introduce a functional linear structural equation model for causal structure learning. To enhance interpretability, our model involves a low-dimensional causal embedded space. We prove that the proposed model is causally identifiable under standard assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T15:19:24Z)
• Approximating Counterfactual Bounds while Fusing Observational, Biased and Randomised Data Sources [64.96984404868411]
  We address the problem of integrating data from multiple, possibly biased, observational and interventional studies. We show that the likelihood of the available data has no local maxima. We then show how the same approach can address the general case of multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T11:28:24Z)
• Learn from Unpaired Data for Image Restoration: A Variational Bayes Approach [18.007258270845107]
  We propose LUD-VAE, a deep generative method to learn the joint probability density function from data sampled from marginal distributions. We apply our method to real-world image denoising and super-resolution tasks and train the models using the synthetic data generated by the LUD-VAE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-21T13:27:17Z)
• PCENet: High Dimensional Surrogate Modeling for Learning Uncertainty [15.781915567005251]
  We present a novel surrogate model for representation learning and uncertainty quantification. The proposed model combines a neural network approach for dimensionality reduction of the (potentially high-dimensional) data, with a surrogate model method for learning the data distribution. Our model enables us to (a) learn a representation of the data, (b) estimate uncertainty in the high-dimensional data system, and (c) match high order moments of the output distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T14:42:51Z)
• Approximate Bayesian Computation with Domain Expert in the Loop [13.801835670003008]
  We introduce an active learning method for ABC statistics selection which reduces the domain expert's work considerably. By involving the experts, we are able to handle misspecified models, unlike the existing dimension reduction methods. empirical results show better posterior estimates than with existing methods, when the simulation budget is limited.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T12:58:51Z)
• Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effect by Data Combination [3.655021726150368]
  It is important to estimate the local average treatment effect (LATE) when compliance with a treatment assignment is incomplete. Previously proposed methods for LATE estimation required all relevant variables to be jointly observed in a single dataset. We propose a weighted least squares estimator that enables simpler model selection by avoiding the minimax objective formulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-11T03:51:48Z)
• Imputation-Free Learning from Incomplete Observations [73.15386629370111]
  We introduce the importance of guided gradient descent (IGSGD) method to train inference from inputs containing missing values without imputation. We employ reinforcement learning (RL) to adjust the gradients used to train the models via back-propagation. Our imputation-free predictions outperform the traditional two-step imputation-based predictions using state-of-the-art imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:44:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.