Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14511v2
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 14:13:41 GMT
- Title: Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods
- Authors: Xinyang Hu, Fengzhuo Zhang, Siyu Chen, Zhuoran Yang,
- Abstract summary: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and its variants have gained popularity as effective methods for solving multi-step reasoning problems.
We analyze CoT prompting from a statistical estimation perspective, providing a comprehensive characterization of its sample complexity.
- Score: 59.779795063072655
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and its variants have gained popularity as effective methods for solving multi-step reasoning problems using pretrained large language models (LLMs). In this work, we analyze CoT prompting from a statistical estimation perspective, providing a comprehensive characterization of its sample complexity. To this end, we introduce a multi-step latent variable model that encapsulates the reasoning process, where the latent variable encodes the task information. Under this framework, we demonstrate that when the pretraining dataset is sufficiently large, the estimator formed by CoT prompting is equivalent to a Bayesian estimator. This estimator effectively solves the multi-step reasoning problem by aggregating a posterior distribution inferred from the demonstration examples in the prompt. Moreover, we prove that the statistical error of the CoT estimator can be decomposed into two main components: (i) a prompting error, which arises from inferring the true task using CoT prompts, and (ii) the statistical error of the pretrained LLM. We establish that, under appropriate assumptions, the prompting error decays exponentially to zero as the number of demonstrations increases. Additionally, we explicitly characterize the approximation and generalization errors of the pretrained LLM. Notably, we construct a transformer model that approximates the target distribution of the multi-step reasoning problem with an error that decreases exponentially in the number of transformer blocks. Our analysis extends to other variants of CoT, including Self-Consistent CoT, Tree-of-Thought, and Selection-Inference, offering a broad perspective on the efficacy of these methods. We also provide numerical experiments to validate the theoretical findings.
Related papers
- Exogenous Matching: Learning Good Proposals for Tractable Counterfactual Estimation [1.9662978733004601]
We propose an importance sampling method for tractable and efficient estimation of counterfactual expressions.
By minimizing a common upper bound of counterfactual estimators, we transform the variance minimization problem into a conditional distribution learning problem.
We validate the theoretical results through experiments under various types and settings of Structural Causal Models (SCMs) and demonstrate the outperformance on counterfactual estimation tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T03:08:28Z) - From Sparse Dependence to Sparse Attention: Unveiling How Chain-of-Thought Enhances Transformer Sample Efficiency [17.612497960364916]
Chain-of-thought (CoT) significantly enhances the reasoning performance of large language models (LLM)
We demonstrate that CoT can substantially improve sample efficiency even when representation power is sufficient.
We show that CoT simplifies the learning process by introducing sparse dependencies among input tokens, and leads to a sparse and interpretable attention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T19:45:09Z) - Training Nonlinear Transformers for Chain-of-Thought Inference: A Theoretical Generalization Analysis [82.51626700527837]
Chain-of-shift (CoT) is an efficient method that enables the reasoning ability of large language models by augmenting the query using examples with multiple intermediate steps.
We show that despite the theoretical success of CoT, it fails to provide an accurate generalization when CoT does.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T03:12:51Z) - Amortizing intractable inference in large language models [56.92471123778389]
We use amortized Bayesian inference to sample from intractable posterior distributions.
We empirically demonstrate that this distribution-matching paradigm of LLM fine-tuning can serve as an effective alternative to maximum-likelihood training.
As an important application, we interpret chain-of-thought reasoning as a latent variable modeling problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-06T16:36:08Z) - Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks.
The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data.
Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z) - What and How does In-Context Learning Learn? Bayesian Model Averaging,
Parameterization, and Generalization [111.55277952086155]
We study In-Context Learning (ICL) by addressing several open questions.
We show that, without updating the neural network parameters, ICL implicitly implements the Bayesian model averaging algorithm.
We prove that the error of pretrained model is bounded by a sum of an approximation error and a generalization error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-30T21:23:47Z) - Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Counterfactual Estimation [12.159830463756341]
We propose a probabilistic paradigm to estimate a diverse set of counterfactuals.
We treat the perturbations as random variables endowed with prior distribution functions.
A gradient based sampler with superior convergence characteristics efficiently computes the posterior samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-21T00:21:11Z) - Efficient CDF Approximations for Normalizing Flows [64.60846767084877]
We build upon the diffeomorphic properties of normalizing flows to estimate the cumulative distribution function (CDF) over a closed region.
Our experiments on popular flow architectures and UCI datasets show a marked improvement in sample efficiency as compared to traditional estimators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-23T06:11:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.