Predicted by Orwell: A discourse on the gradual shift in electronic
surveillance law
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11594v1
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:33:04 GMT
- Title: Predicted by Orwell: A discourse on the gradual shift in electronic
surveillance law
- Authors: Scott McLachlan
- Abstract summary: This report looks at human rights legislation in three jurisdictions.
It compares and contrasts the protections that are available from illegal search and seizure.
It discusses the processes that have led to a gradual yet pervasive weakening of those laws in all three nations.
- Score: 0.18275108630751835
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: At some point in the history of most nations, one or more events of illegal
electronic surveillance by those in power or law enforcement has occurred that
has the effect of setting State against Citizen. The media sensationalise these
incidents for profit, however they more often correctly express the concern
felt by the general public. At these times politicians rise, either into fame
or infamy, by proposing new legislation which the public is told will protect
them by from future incidents of illegal and unwarranted invasion by officers
of the state. Two things have occurred since these protective laws were
enacted; technological advancement that is claimed has frustrated legitimate
investigation, and changes in the law that are ostensibly presented as
intending to facilitate the prosecution or prevention of a publicly decried
offence, like child pornography, but which in context deliver expanded powers
to the State, effectively weakening the protections previously enacted.
This report looks at human rights legislation in three jurisdictions,
starting from a position of comparing and contrasting the protections that are
available from illegal search and seizure. By identifying legislative changes
related to several forms of electronic surveillance and technology, and the
situations that led to them, we can locate the effective peak of protection and
discuss the processes that have led to a gradual yet pervasive weakening of
those laws in all three nations.
We are regularly diverted by those in power towards disregarding the paranoia
of the outliers who have been warning us with their purple prose that big
brother is watching. But if we focus on the effect of recent legislative
changes in the area of electronic surveillance we can clearly see that the
Orwellian dystopia is already here, and we are living it.
Related papers
- AI threats to national security can be countered through an incident regime [55.2480439325792]
We propose a legally mandated post-deployment AI incident regime that aims to counter potential national security threats from AI systems.
Our proposed AI incident regime is split into three phases. The first phase revolves around a novel operationalization of what counts as an 'AI incident'
The second and third phases spell out that AI providers should notify a government agency about incidents, and that the government agency should be involved in amending AI providers' security and safety procedures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-25T17:51:50Z) - Section 230: A Juridical History [0.0]
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is the most important law in the history of the internet.
The law has not kept pace with the times and is now a source of deep consternation to courts and legislatures.
This Article acts as a guidebook to reformers by examining how we got to where we are today.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T15:09:40Z) - Demarked: A Strategy for Enhanced Abusive Speech Moderation through Counterspeech, Detoxification, and Message Management [71.99446449877038]
We propose a more comprehensive approach called Demarcation scoring abusive speech based on four aspect -- (i) severity scale; (ii) presence of a target; (iii) context scale; (iv) legal scale.
Our work aims to inform future strategies for effectively addressing abusive speech online.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T21:45:33Z) - PILOT: Legal Case Outcome Prediction with Case Law [43.680862577060765]
We identify two unique challenges in making legal case outcome predictions with case law.
First, it is crucial to identify relevant precedent cases that serve as fundamental evidence for judges during decision-making.
Second, it is necessary to consider the evolution of legal principles over time, as early cases may adhere to different legal contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-28T21:18:05Z) - SoK: Technical Implementation and Human Impact of Internet Privacy
Regulations [2.797211052758564]
We analyze a set of Internet privacy and data protection regulations drawn from around the world.
We develop a taxonomy of rights granted and obligations imposed by these laws.
We then leverage this taxonomy to systematize 270 technical research papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-24T01:48:07Z) - SoK: The Gap Between Data Rights Ideals and Reality [46.14715472341707]
Do rights-based privacy laws effectively empower individuals over their data?
This paper scrutinizes these approaches by reviewing empirical studies, news articles, and blog posts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-03T21:52:51Z) - A Juridicidade e a Regulamenta\c{c}\~ao dos Dark Patterns [0.0]
The work aims to address whether Dark Patterns are legal or illegal in the face of Brazilian data protection and consumer law.
Although some implementations are capable of producing damage and violating rights in some cases the mere declaration of the illegality of these techniques is an insufficient solution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-17T12:13:13Z) - Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a
256GB Open-Source Legal Dataset [46.156169284961045]
We offer an approach to filtering grounded in law, which has directly addressed the tradeoffs in filtering material.
First, we gather and make available the Pile of Law, a 256GB dataset of open-source English-language legal and administrative data.
Second, we distill the legal norms that governments have developed to constrain the inclusion of toxic or private content into actionable lessons.
Third, we show how the Pile of Law offers researchers the opportunity to learn such filtering rules directly from the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-01T06:25:15Z) - Initiative Defense against Facial Manipulation [82.96864888025797]
We propose a novel framework of initiative defense to degrade the performance of facial manipulation models controlled by malicious users.
We first imitate the target manipulation model with a surrogate model, and then devise a poison perturbation generator to obtain the desired venom.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-19T09:42:28Z) - A Mental Trespass? Unveiling Truth, Exposing Thoughts and Threatening
Civil Liberties with Non-Invasive AI Lie Detection [0.0]
We argue why artificial intelligence-based, non-invasive lie detection technologies are likely to experience a rapid advancement in the coming years.
Legal and popular perspectives are reviewed to evaluate the potential for these technologies to cause societal harm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-16T08:09:38Z) - The effect of differential victim crime reporting on predictive policing
systems [84.86615754515252]
We show how differential victim crime reporting rates can lead to outcome disparities in common crime hot spot prediction models.
Our results suggest that differential crime reporting rates can lead to a displacement of predicted hotspots from high crime but low reporting areas to high or medium crime and high reporting areas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-30T01:57:22Z) - The Rise of Technology in Crime Prevention: Opportunities, Challenges
and Practitioners Perspectives [2.283665431721732]
It is a moral obligation for the research community to consider how the contemporary technological developments might help reduce crime worldwide.
This paper provides a discussion of how a sample of contemporary hardware and software-based technologies might help further reduce criminal actions.
After a thorough analysis of a wide array of technologies, we believe that the adoption of novel technologies by vulnerable individuals, victim support organisations and law enforcement can help reduce the occurrence of criminal activity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-26T16:02:40Z) - Imposing Regulation on Advanced Algorithms [0.0]
The book examines universally applicable patterns in administrative decisions and judicial rulings.
It investigates the role and significance of national and indeed supranational regulatory bodies for advanced algorithms.
It considers ENISA, an EU agency that focuses on network and information security, as an interesting candidate for a European regulator of advanced algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-16T20:26:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.