Study on Patterns and Effect of Task Diversity in Software Crowdsourcing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.00871v2
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:22:36 GMT
- Title: Study on Patterns and Effect of Task Diversity in Software Crowdsourcing
- Authors: Denisse Martinez Mejorado, Razieh Saremi, Ye Yang, and Jose E.
Ramirez-Marquez
- Abstract summary: The objective of this study is to empirically investigate patterns and effect of task diversity in software crowdsourcing platform.
The empirical study is conducted on more than one year's real-world data from TopCoder, the leading software crowdsourcing platform.
- Score: 1.758684872705242
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Context: The success of software crowdsourcing depends on steady tasks supply
and active worker pool. Existing analysis reveals an average task failure ratio
of 15.7% in software crowdsourcing market. Goal: The objective of this study is
to empirically investigate patterns and effect of task diversity in software
crowdsourcing platform in order to improve the success and efficiency of
software crowdsourcing. Method: We propose a conceptual task diversity model,
and develop an approach to measuring and analyzing task diversity.More
specifically, this includes grouping similar tasks, ranking them based on their
competition level and identifying the dominant attributes that distinguish
among these levels, and then studying the impact of task diversity on task
success and worker performance in crowdsourcing platform. The empirical study
is conducted on more than one year's real-world data from TopCoder, the leading
software crowdsourcing platform. Results: We identified that monetary prize and
task complexity are the dominant attributes that differentiate among different
competition levels. Based on these dominant attributes, we found three task
diversity patterns (configurations) from workers behavior perspective:
responsive to prize, responsive to prize and complexity and over responsive to
prize. This study supports that1) responsive to prize configuration provides
highest level of task density and workers' reliability in a platform; 2)
responsive to prize and complexity configuration leads to attracting high level
of trustworthy workers; 3) over responsive to prize configuration results in
highest task stability and the lowest failure ratio in the platform for not
high similar tasks.
Related papers
- Cross-Task Experiential Learning on LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration [63.90193684394165]
We introduce multi-agent cross-task experiential learning (MAEL), a novel framework that endows LLM-driven agents with explicit cross-task learning and experience accumulation.<n>During the experiential learning phase, we quantify the quality for each step in the task-solving workflow and store the resulting rewards.<n>During inference, agents retrieve high-reward, task-relevant experiences as few-shot examples to enhance the effectiveness of each reasoning step.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T07:24:37Z) - MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents [59.825725526176655]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents.
Existing benchmarks either focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition.
We introduce MultiAgentBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T05:18:50Z) - An Overview of Large Language Models for Statisticians [109.38601458831545]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools in artificial intelligence (AI)
This paper explores potential areas where statisticians can make important contributions to the development of LLMs.
We focus on issues such as uncertainty quantification, interpretability, fairness, privacy, watermarking and model adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T03:40:36Z) - Heterogeneous Graph Reinforcement Learning for Dependency-aware Multi-task Allocation in Spatial Crowdsourcing [33.915222518617085]
This paper formally investigates the problem of Dependency-aware Multi-task Allocation (DMA)
It presents a well-designed framework to solve it, known as Heterogeneous Graph Reinforcement Learning-based Task Allocation (HGRL-TA)
Experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of the proposed HGRL-TA in solving the DMA problem, leading to average profits that is 21.78% higher than those achieved using the metaheuristic methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-20T17:00:45Z) - On the Evaluation of Generative Robotic Simulations [35.8253733339539]
We propose a comprehensive evaluation framework tailored to generative simulations.
For single-task quality, we evaluate the realism of the generated task and the completeness of the generated trajectories.
For task-level generalization, we assess the zero-shot generalization ability on unseen tasks of a policy trained with multiple generated tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:49:25Z) - WESE: Weak Exploration to Strong Exploitation for LLM Agents [95.6720931773781]
This paper proposes a novel approach, Weak Exploration to Strong Exploitation (WESE) to enhance LLM agents in solving open-world interactive tasks.
WESE involves decoupling the exploration and exploitation process, employing a cost-effective weak agent to perform exploration tasks for global knowledge.
A knowledge graph-based strategy is then introduced to store the acquired knowledge and extract task-relevant knowledge, enhancing the stronger agent in success rate and efficiency for the exploitation task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-11T03:31:54Z) - Evaluating Collaborative and Autonomous Agents in Data-Stream-Supported
Coordination of Mobile Crowdsourcing [0.7865191493201839]
In mobile crowdsourcing, tasks often get assigned to crowdworkers who struggle to complete those tasks successfully.
We propose different mechanisms to achieve outcome prediction and task coordination in mobile crowdsourcing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-23T16:00:45Z) - Diversity-Based Recruitment in Crowdsensing By Combinatorial Multi-Armed
Bandits [6.802315212233411]
This paper explores mobile crowdsensing, which leverages mobile devices and their users for collective sensing tasks under the coordination of a central requester.
The primary challenge here is the variability in the sensing capabilities of individual workers, which are initially unknown and must be progressively learned.
We propose a novel model that enhances task diversity over the rounds by dynamically adjusting the weight of tasks in each round based on their frequency of assignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-25T13:54:58Z) - Benchmarking Robustness and Generalization in Multi-Agent Systems: A
Case Study on Neural MMO [50.58083807719749]
We present the results of the second Neural MMO challenge, hosted at IJCAI 2022, which received 1600+ submissions.
This competition targets robustness and generalization in multi-agent systems.
We will open-source our benchmark including the environment wrapper, baselines, a visualization tool, and selected policies for further research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-30T07:16:11Z) - Towards Task Sampler Learning for Meta-Learning [37.02030832662183]
Meta-learning aims to learn general knowledge with diverse training tasks conducted from limited data, and then transfer it to new tasks.
It is commonly believed that increasing task diversity will enhance the generalization ability of meta-learning models.
This paper challenges this view through empirical and theoretical analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-18T01:53:18Z) - Exposing and Addressing Cross-Task Inconsistency in Unified
Vision-Language Models [80.23791222509644]
Inconsistent AI models are considered brittle and untrustworthy by human users.
We find that state-of-the-art vision-language models suffer from a surprisingly high degree of inconsistent behavior across tasks.
We propose a rank correlation-based auxiliary training objective, computed over large automatically created cross-task contrast sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T16:57:12Z) - Reinforcement Learning with Success Induced Task Prioritization [68.8204255655161]
We introduce Success Induced Task Prioritization (SITP), a framework for automatic curriculum learning.
The algorithm selects the order of tasks that provide the fastest learning for agents.
We demonstrate that SITP matches or surpasses the results of other curriculum design methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-30T12:32:43Z) - Uni-Perceiver: Pre-training Unified Architecture for Generic Perception
for Zero-shot and Few-shot Tasks [73.63892022944198]
We present a generic perception architecture named Uni-Perceiver.
It processes a variety of modalities and tasks with unified modeling and shared parameters.
Results show that our pre-trained model without any tuning can achieve reasonable performance even on novel tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-02T18:59:50Z) - Randomized Entity-wise Factorization for Multi-Agent Reinforcement
Learning [59.62721526353915]
Multi-agent settings in the real world often involve tasks with varying types and quantities of agents and non-agent entities.
Our method aims to leverage these commonalities by asking the question: What is the expected utility of each agent when only considering a randomly selected sub-group of its observed entities?''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-07T18:28:41Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.