Jointly Predicting Job Performance, Personality, Cognitive Ability, Affect, and Well-Being

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08364v1
• Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:30:29 GMT
• Title: Jointly Predicting Job Performance, Personality, Cognitive Ability, Affect, and Well-Being
• Authors: Pablo Robles-Granda, Suwen Lin, Xian Wu, Sidney D'Mello, Gonzalo J. Martinez, Koustuv Saha, Kari Nies, Gloria Mark, Andrew T. Campbell, Munmun De Choudhury, Anind D. Dey, Julie Gregg, Ted Grover, Stephen M. Mattingly, Shayan Mirjafari, Edward Moskal, Aaron Striegel, Nitesh V. Chawla
• Abstract summary: We create a benchmark for predictive analysis of individuals from a perspective that integrates physical and physiological behavior, psychological states and traits, and job performance. We design data mining techniques as benchmark and uses real noisy and incomplete data derived from wearable sensors to predict 19 constructs based on 12 standardized well-validated tests.
• Score: 42.67003631848889
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Assessment of job performance, personalized health and psychometric measures are domains where data-driven and ubiquitous computing exhibits the potential of a profound impact in the future. Existing techniques use data extracted from questionnaires, sensors (wearable, computer, etc.), or other traits, to assess well-being and cognitive attributes of individuals. However, these techniques can neither predict individual's well-being and psychological traits in a global manner nor consider the challenges associated to processing the data available, that is incomplete and noisy. In this paper, we create a benchmark for predictive analysis of individuals from a perspective that integrates: physical and physiological behavior, psychological states and traits, and job performance. We design data mining techniques as benchmark and uses real noisy and incomplete data derived from wearable sensors to predict 19 constructs based on 12 standardized well-validated tests. The study included 757 participants who were knowledge workers in organizations across the USA with varied work roles. We developed a data mining framework to extract the meaningful predictors for each of the 19 variables under consideration. Our model is the first benchmark that combines these various instrument-derived variables in a single framework to understand people's behavior by leveraging real uncurated data from wearable, mobile, and social media sources. We verify our approach experimentally using the data obtained from our longitudinal study. The results show that our framework is consistently reliable and capable of predicting the variables under study better than the baselines when prediction is restricted to the noisy, incomplete data.

Related papers

• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• Analyzing the contribution of different passively collected data to predict Stress and Depression [1.7638111859993633]
  We analyze the contribution of different passively collected sensor data types to predict daily selfreport stress and PHQ-9 depression score. Our results show that WiFi features (which encode mobility patterns) and Phone Log features (which encode information correlated with sleep patterns) provide significative information for stress and depression prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T15:57:22Z)
• Dataset Bias in Human Activity Recognition [57.91018542715725]
  This contribution statistically curates the training data to assess to what degree the physical characteristics of humans influence HAR performance. We evaluate the performance of a state-of-the-art convolutional neural network on two HAR datasets that vary in the sensors, activities, and recording for time-series HAR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-19T12:33:50Z)
• Utility Assessment of Synthetic Data Generation Methods [0.0]
  We investigate whether different methods of generating fully synthetic data vary in their utility a priori. We find some methods to perform better than others across the board. We do get promising findings for classification tasks when using synthetic data for training machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T11:09:52Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)
• Empirical Estimates on Hand Manipulation are Recoverable: A Step Towards Individualized and Explainable Robotic Support in Everyday Activities [80.37857025201036]
  Key challenge for robotic systems is to figure out the behavior of another agent. Processing correct inferences is especially challenging when (confounding) factors are not controlled experimentally. We propose equipping robots with the necessary tools to conduct observational studies on people.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T22:15:56Z)
• Measuring Utility and Privacy of Synthetic Genomic Data [3.635321290763711]
  We provide the first evaluation of the utility and the privacy protection of five state-of-the-art models for generating synthetic genomic data. Overall, there is no single approach for generating synthetic genomic data that performs well across the board.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T17:41:01Z)
• Model-agnostic Fits for Understanding Information Seeking Patterns in Humans [0.0]
  In decision making tasks under uncertainty, humans display characteristic biases in seeking, integrating, and acting upon information relevant to the task. Here, we reexamine data from previous carefully designed experiments, collected at scale, that measured and catalogued these biases in aggregate form. We design deep learning models that replicate these biases in aggregate, while also capturing individual variation in behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-09T04:34:58Z)
• DeepCoDA: personalized interpretability for compositional health data [58.841559626549376]
  Interpretability allows the domain-expert to evaluate the model's relevance and reliability. In the healthcare setting, interpretable models should implicate relevant biological mechanisms independent of technical factors. We define personalized interpretability as a measure of sample-specific feature attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T05:14:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.