Quantifying the Uncertainty in Model Parameters Using Gaussian Process-Based Markov Chain Monte Carlo: An Application to Cardiac Electrophysiological Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.01983v1
• Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 23:48:15 GMT
• Title: Quantifying the Uncertainty in Model Parameters Using Gaussian Process-Based Markov Chain Monte Carlo: An Application to Cardiac Electrophysiological Models
• Authors: Jwala Dhamala, John L. Sapp, B. Milan Hor\'acek, Linwei Wang
• Abstract summary: Estimates of patient-specific model parameters are important for personalized modeling. Standard Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling requires repeated model simulations that are computationally infeasible. A common solution is to replace the simulation model with a computationally-efficient surrogate for a faster sampling.
• Score: 7.8316005711996235
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Estimation of patient-specific model parameters is important for personalized modeling, although sparse and noisy clinical data can introduce significant uncertainty in the estimated parameter values. This importance source of uncertainty, if left unquantified, will lead to unknown variability in model outputs that hinder their reliable adoptions. Probabilistic estimation model parameters, however, remains an unresolved challenge because standard Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling requires repeated model simulations that are computationally infeasible. A common solution is to replace the simulation model with a computationally-efficient surrogate for a faster sampling. However, by sampling from an approximation of the exact posterior probability density function (pdf) of the parameters, the efficiency is gained at the expense of sampling accuracy. In this paper, we address this issue by integrating surrogate modeling into Metropolis Hasting (MH) sampling of the exact posterior pdfs to improve its acceptance rate. It is done by first quickly constructing a Gaussian process (GP) surrogate of the exact posterior pdfs using deterministic optimization. This efficient surrogate is then used to modify commonly-used proposal distributions in MH sampling such that only proposals accepted by the surrogate will be tested by the exact posterior pdf for acceptance/rejection, reducing unnecessary model simulations at unlikely candidates. Synthetic and real-data experiments using the presented method show a significant gain in computational efficiency without compromising the accuracy. In addition, insights into the non-identifiability and heterogeneity of tissue properties can be gained from the obtained posterior distributions.

Related papers

• Variational Bayesian surrogate modelling with application to robust design optimisation [0.9626666671366836]
  Surrogate models provide a quick-to-evaluate approximation to complex computational models. We consider Bayesian inference for constructing statistical surrogates with input uncertainties and dimensionality reduction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T09:22:35Z)
• Deep Evidential Learning for Bayesian Quantile Regression [3.6294895527930504]
  It is desirable to have accurate uncertainty estimation from a single deterministic forward-pass model. This paper proposes a deep Bayesian quantile regression model that can estimate the quantiles of a continuous target distribution without the Gaussian assumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T11:42:16Z)
• Conditional Korhunen-Lo\'{e}ve regression model with Basis Adaptation for high-dimensional problems: uncertainty quantification and inverse modeling [62.997667081978825]
  We propose a methodology for improving the accuracy of surrogate models of the observable response of physical systems. We apply the proposed methodology to constructing surrogate models via the Basis Adaptation (BA) method of the stationary hydraulic head response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T18:14:38Z)
• Efficient Propagation of Uncertainty via Reordering Monte Carlo Samples [0.7087237546722617]
  Uncertainty propagation is a technique to determine model output uncertainties based on the uncertainty in its input variables. In this work, we investigate the hypothesis that while all samples are useful on average, some samples must be more useful than others. We introduce a methodology to adaptively reorder MC samples and show how it results in reduction of computational expense of UP processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T21:28:15Z)
• Theoretical characterization of uncertainty in high-dimensional linear classification [24.073221004661427]
  We show that uncertainty for learning from limited number of samples of high-dimensional input data and labels can be obtained by the approximate message passing algorithm. We discuss how over-confidence can be mitigated by appropriately regularising, and show that cross-validating with respect to the loss leads to better calibration than with the 0/1 error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T15:32:07Z)
• Inverting brain grey matter models with likelihood-free inference: a tool for trustable cytoarchitecture measurements [62.997667081978825]
  characterisation of the brain grey matter cytoarchitecture with quantitative sensitivity to soma density and volume remains an unsolved challenge in dMRI. We propose a new forward model, specifically a new system of equations, requiring a few relatively sparse b-shells. We then apply modern tools from Bayesian analysis known as likelihood-free inference (LFI) to invert our proposed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T09:08:27Z)
• Training on Test Data with Bayesian Adaptation for Covariate Shift [96.3250517412545]
  Deep neural networks often make inaccurate predictions with unreliable uncertainty estimates. We derive a Bayesian model that provides for a well-defined relationship between unlabeled inputs under distributional shift and model parameters. We show that our method improves both accuracy and uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T01:09:08Z)
• Variational Inference with NoFAS: Normalizing Flow with Adaptive Surrogate for Computationally Expensive Models [7.217783736464403]
  Use of sampling-based approaches such as Markov chain Monte Carlo may become intractable when each likelihood evaluation is computationally expensive. New approaches combining variational inference with normalizing flow are characterized by a computational cost that grows only linearly with the dimensionality of the latent variable space. We propose Normalizing Flow with Adaptive Surrogate (NoFAS), an optimization strategy that alternatively updates the normalizing flow parameters and the weights of a neural network surrogate model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-28T14:31:45Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• SUMO: Unbiased Estimation of Log Marginal Probability for Latent Variable Models [80.22609163316459]
  We introduce an unbiased estimator of the log marginal likelihood and its gradients for latent variable models based on randomized truncation of infinite series. We show that models trained using our estimator give better test-set likelihoods than a standard importance-sampling based approach for the same average computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T11:49:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.