The Essential Role of Empirical Validation in Legislative Redistricting
Simulation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10148v1
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:51:43 GMT
- Title: The Essential Role of Empirical Validation in Legislative Redistricting
Simulation
- Authors: Benjamin Fifield, Kosuke Imai, Jun Kawahara, Christopher T. Kenny
- Abstract summary: We apply a recently developed computational method that can efficiently enumerate all possible redistricting plans.
We show that this algorithm scales to a state with a couple of hundred geographical units.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: As granular data about elections and voters become available, redistricting
simulation methods are playing an increasingly important role when legislatures
adopt redistricting plans and courts determine their legality. These simulation
methods are designed to yield a representative sample of all redistricting
plans that satisfy statutory guidelines and requirements such as contiguity,
population parity, and compactness. A proposed redistricting plan can be
considered gerrymandered if it constitutes an outlier relative to this sample
according to partisan fairness metrics. Despite their growing use, an
insufficient effort has been made to empirically validate the accuracy of the
simulation methods. We apply a recently developed computational method that can
efficiently enumerate all possible redistricting plans and yield an independent
uniform sample from this population. We show that this algorithm scales to a
state with a couple of hundred geographical units. Finally, we empirically
examine how existing simulation methods perform on realistic validation data
sets.
Related papers
- ElectionSim: Massive Population Election Simulation Powered by Large Language Model Driven Agents [70.17229548653852]
We introduce ElectionSim, an innovative election simulation framework based on large language models.
We present a million-level voter pool sampled from social media platforms to support accurate individual simulation.
We also introduce PPE, a poll-based presidential election benchmark to assess the performance of our framework under the U.S. presidential election scenario.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T05:25:50Z) - Efficient Weighting Schemes for Auditing Instant-Runoff Voting Elections [57.67176250198289]
AWAIRE involves adaptively weighted averages of test statistics, essentially "learning" an effective set of hypotheses to test.
We explore schemes and settings more extensively, to identify and recommend efficient choices for practice.
A limitation of the current AWAIRE implementation is its restriction to a small number of candidates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T10:13:01Z) - Multiscale Parallel Tempering for Fast Sampling on Redistricting Plans [1.1233768932957773]
A persuasive method is to compare the plan with an ensemble of neutrally drawn redistricting plans.
To audit the partisan difference between the ensemble and a given plan, one must ensure that the non-partisan criteria are matched.
In this work, we generate a multiscale parallel tempering approach that makes local moves at each scale.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T21:33:05Z) - Simulated redistricting plans for the analysis and evaluation of
redistricting in the United States [0.2529563359433233]
This article introduces the 50stateSimulations, a collection of simulated congressional districting plans and underlying code.
The 50stateSimulations allow for the evaluation of enacted and other congressional redistricting plans in the United States.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-21T22:47:16Z) - Mathematically Quantifying Non-responsiveness of the 2021 Georgia
Congressional Districting Plan [3.097163558730473]
We use a Metropolized-sampling technique through a parallel tempering method combined with ReCom.
We develop these improvements through the first case study of district plans in Georgia.
Our analysis projects that any election in Georgia will reliably elect 9 Republicans and 5 Democrats under the enacted plan.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-13T02:58:32Z) - Measuring Geometric Similarity Across Possible Plans for Automated
Redistricting [0.0]
This paper briefly introduces an interpretive measure of similarity, and a corresponding assignment matrix, that corresponds to the percentage of a state's area or population that stays in the same congressional district between two plans.
We then show how to calculate this measure in an intuitive time and briefly demonstrate some potential use-cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-17T03:37:25Z) - Local policy search with Bayesian optimization [73.0364959221845]
Reinforcement learning aims to find an optimal policy by interaction with an environment.
Policy gradients for local search are often obtained from random perturbations.
We develop an algorithm utilizing a probabilistic model of the objective function and its gradient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-22T16:07:02Z) - Sequential Monte Carlo for Sampling Balanced and Compact Redistricting
Plans [0.0]
We present a new Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) algorithm that generates a sample of redistricting plans converging to a realistic target distribution.
We validate the accuracy of the proposed algorithm by using a small map where all redistricting plans can be enumerated.
We then apply the SMC algorithm to evaluate the partisan implications of several maps submitted by relevant parties in a recent high-profile redistricting case in the state of Pennsylvania.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-13T23:26:34Z) - Making Affine Correspondences Work in Camera Geometry Computation [62.7633180470428]
Local features provide region-to-region rather than point-to-point correspondences.
We propose guidelines for effective use of region-to-region matches in the course of a full model estimation pipeline.
Experiments show that affine solvers can achieve accuracy comparable to point-based solvers at faster run-times.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-20T12:07:48Z) - Real-Time Regression with Dividing Local Gaussian Processes [62.01822866877782]
Local Gaussian processes are a novel, computationally efficient modeling approach based on Gaussian process regression.
Due to an iterative, data-driven division of the input space, they achieve a sublinear computational complexity in the total number of training points in practice.
A numerical evaluation on real-world data sets shows their advantages over other state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy as well as prediction and update speed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-16T18:43:31Z) - Planning in Markov Decision Processes with Gap-Dependent Sample
Complexity [48.98199700043158]
We propose MDP-GapE, a new trajectory-based Monte-Carlo Tree Search algorithm for planning in a Markov Decision Process.
We prove an upper bound on the number of calls to the generative models needed for MDP-GapE to identify a near-optimal action with high probability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-10T15:05:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.