Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI: Volume 1

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12020v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:07:13 GMT
• Title: Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI: Volume 1
• Authors: OHAAI Collaboration: Federico Castagna, Timotheus Kampik, Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, Micka\"el Lafages, Jack Mumford, Christos T. Rodosthenous, Samy S\'a, Stefan Sarkadi, Joseph Singleton, Kenneth Skiba, Andreas Xydis
• Abstract summary: This volume contains revised versions of the papers selected for the first volume of the Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI (OHAAI) Argumentation as a field within artificial intelligence (AI) is highly relevant for researchers interested in symbolic representations of knowledge and defeasible reasoning. OHAAI is designed to serve as a research hub to keep track of the latest and upcoming PhD-driven research on the theory and application of argumentation in all areas related to AI.
• Score: 2.0620687400727093
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This volume contains revised versions of the papers selected for the first volume of the Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI (OHAAI). Previously, formal theories of argument and argument interaction have been proposed and studied, and this has led to the more recent study of computational models of argument. Argumentation, as a field within artificial intelligence (AI), is highly relevant for researchers interested in symbolic representations of knowledge and defeasible reasoning. The purpose of this handbook is to provide an open access and curated anthology for the argumentation research community. OHAAI is designed to serve as a research hub to keep track of the latest and upcoming PhD-driven research on the theory and application of argumentation in all areas related to AI.

Related papers

• Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI: Volume 4 [0.5318828099393893]
  This volume contains revised versions of the papers selected for the fourth volume of the Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI (OHAAI) Argumentation as a field within artificial intelligence (AI) is highly relevant for researchers interested in symbolic representations of knowledge and defeasible reasoning. OHAAI is designed to serve as a research hub to keep track of the latest and upcoming PhD-driven research on the theory and application of argumentation in all areas related to AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T16:11:10Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation Models [235.7288855108172]
  Reasoning plays a pivotal role in various real-world settings such as negotiation, medical diagnosis, and criminal investigation. We introduce seminal foundation models proposed or adaptable for reasoning. We then delve into the potential future directions behind the emergence of reasoning abilities within foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T15:16:13Z)
• A Unifying Framework for Learning Argumentation Semantics [50.69905074548764]
  We present a novel framework, which uses an Inductive Logic Programming approach to learn the acceptability semantics for several abstract and structured argumentation frameworks in an interpretable way. Our framework outperforms existing argumentation solvers, thus opening up new future research directions in the area of formal argumentation and human-machine dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T20:18:05Z)
• Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI: Volume 3 [1.5863918137497997]
  This volume contains revised versions of the papers selected for the third volume of the Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI (OHAAI) Argumentation as a field within artificial intelligence (AI) is highly relevant for researchers interested in symbolic representations of knowledge and defeasible reasoning. OHAAI is designed to serve as a research hub to keep track of the latest and upcoming PhD-driven research on the theory and application of argumentation in all areas related to AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T17:49:44Z)
• Characterising Research Areas in the field of AI [68.8204255655161]
  We identified the main conceptual themes by performing clustering analysis on the co-occurrence network of topics. The results highlight the growing academic interest in research themes like deep learning, machine learning, and internet of things.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T16:30:30Z)
• Computational Argumentation and Cognition [0.3867363075280543]
  This paper stems from the 1st Workshop on Computational Argumentation and Cognition (COGNITAR) It argues that within the context of Human-Centric AI the use of theory and methods from Computational Argumentation for the study of Cognition can be a promising avenue to pursue. The paper presents the main problems and challenges in the area that would need to be addressed, both at the scientific level but also at the level of synthesis of ideas and approaches from the various disciplines involved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-12T21:44:30Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)
• Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI: Volume 2 [0.20872491154425035]
  This volume contains revised versions of the papers selected for the second volume of the Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI (OHAAI) Argumentation as a field within artificial intelligence (AI) is highly relevant for researchers interested in symbolic representations of knowledge and defeasible reasoning. OHAAI is designed to serve as a research hub to keep track of the latest and upcoming PhD-driven research on the theory and application of argumentation in all areas related to AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T13:34:13Z)
• Argumentative XAI: A Survey [15.294433619347082]
  We overview XAI approaches built using methods from the field of computational argumentation. We focus on different types of explanation (intrinsic and post-hoc), different models with which argumentation-based explanations are deployed, different forms of delivery, and different argumentation frameworks they use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T13:32:59Z)
• AR-LSAT: Investigating Analytical Reasoning of Text [57.1542673852013]
  We study the challenge of analytical reasoning of text and introduce a new dataset consisting of questions from the Law School Admission Test from 1991 to 2016. We analyze what knowledge understanding and reasoning abilities are required to do well on this task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T02:53:32Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.