Computational Argumentation and Cognition
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.06958v1
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 21:44:30 GMT
- Title: Computational Argumentation and Cognition
- Authors: Emmanuelle Dietz, Antonis Kakas, Loizos Michael
- Abstract summary: This paper stems from the 1st Workshop on Computational Argumentation and Cognition (COGNITAR)
It argues that within the context of Human-Centric AI the use of theory and methods from Computational Argumentation for the study of Cognition can be a promising avenue to pursue.
The paper presents the main problems and challenges in the area that would need to be addressed, both at the scientific level but also at the level of synthesis of ideas and approaches from the various disciplines involved.
- Score: 0.3867363075280543
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper examines the interdisciplinary research question of how to
integrate Computational Argumentation, as studied in AI, with Cognition, as can
be found in Cognitive Science, Linguistics, and Philosophy. It stems from the
work of the 1st Workshop on Computational Argumentation and Cognition
(COGNITAR), which was organized as part of the 24th European Conference on
Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), and took place virtually on September 8th,
2020. The paper begins with a brief presentation of the scientific motivation
for the integration of Computational Argumentation and Cognition, arguing that
within the context of Human-Centric AI the use of theory and methods from
Computational Argumentation for the study of Cognition can be a promising
avenue to pursue. A short summary of each of the workshop presentations is
given showing the wide spectrum of problems where the synthesis of the theory
and methods of Computational Argumentation with other approaches that study
Cognition can be applied. The paper presents the main problems and challenges
in the area that would need to be addressed, both at the scientific level but
also at the epistemological level, particularly in relation to the synthesis of
ideas and approaches from the various disciplines involved.
Related papers
- A Survey on Compositional Learning of AI Models: Theoretical and Experimental Practices [15.92779896185647]
Compositional learning is crucial for human cognition, especially in human language comprehension and visual perception.
Despite its integral role in intelligence, there is a lack of systematic theoretical and experimental research methodologies.
This paper surveys the literature on compositional learning of AI models and the connections made to cognitive studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T03:46:21Z) - Igniting Language Intelligence: The Hitchhiker's Guide From
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Language Agents [80.5213198675411]
Large language models (LLMs) have dramatically enhanced the field of language intelligence.
LLMs leverage the intriguing chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning techniques, obliging them to formulate intermediate steps en route to deriving an answer.
Recent research endeavors have extended CoT reasoning methodologies to nurture the development of autonomous language agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-20T14:30:55Z) - Solving NLP Problems through Human-System Collaboration: A
Discussion-based Approach [98.13835740351932]
This research aims to create a dataset and computational framework for systems that discuss and refine their predictions through dialogue.
We show that the proposed system can have beneficial discussions with humans improving the accuracy by up to 25 points in the natural language inference task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T16:24:50Z) - Towards a Holistic Understanding of Mathematical Questions with
Contrastive Pre-training [65.10741459705739]
We propose a novel contrastive pre-training approach for mathematical question representations, namely QuesCo.
We first design two-level question augmentations, including content-level and structure-level, which generate literally diverse question pairs with similar purposes.
Then, to fully exploit hierarchical information of knowledge concepts, we propose a knowledge hierarchy-aware rank strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-18T14:23:29Z) - A Survey of Deep Learning for Mathematical Reasoning [71.88150173381153]
We review the key tasks, datasets, and methods at the intersection of mathematical reasoning and deep learning over the past decade.
Recent advances in large-scale neural language models have opened up new benchmarks and opportunities to use deep learning for mathematical reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-20T18:46:16Z) - Computational Inference in Cognitive Science: Operational, Societal and
Ethical Considerations [13.173307471333619]
computational advances have transformed cognitive science into a data-driven field.
There is a proliferation of cognitive theories investigated and interpreted from different academic lens.
We identify the operational challenges, societal impacts and ethical guidelines in conducting research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-24T18:27:27Z) - Scientia Potentia Est -- On the Role of Knowledge in Computational
Argumentation [52.903665881174845]
We propose a pyramid of types of knowledge required in computational argumentation.
We briefly discuss the state of the art on the role and integration of these types in the field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-01T08:12:41Z) - Proceedings Eighteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality
and Knowledge [0.0]
The TARK conference (Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge) is a biannual conference that aims to bring together researchers from a wide variety of fields.
Its goal is to further our understanding of interdisciplinary issues involving reasoning about rationality and knowledge.
Papers have been accepted for presentation at the Eighteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK 2021), held between June 25 and June 27, 2021, at Tsinghua University at Beijing, China.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-21T07:01:14Z) - Formalising Concepts as Grounded Abstractions [68.24080871981869]
This report shows how representation learning can be used to induce concepts from raw data.
The main technical goal of this report is to show how techniques from representation learning can be married with a lattice-theoretic formulation of conceptual spaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-13T15:22:01Z) - Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI: Volume 1 [2.0620687400727093]
This volume contains revised versions of the papers selected for the first volume of the Online Handbook of Argumentation for AI (OHAAI)
Argumentation as a field within artificial intelligence (AI) is highly relevant for researchers interested in symbolic representations of knowledge and defeasible reasoning.
OHAAI is designed to serve as a research hub to keep track of the latest and upcoming PhD-driven research on the theory and application of argumentation in all areas related to AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T06:07:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.