Comment on "A Loophole of All "Loophole-Free" Bell-Type Theorems"

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.00369v1
• Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 00:34:25 GMT
• Title: Comment on "A Loophole of All "Loophole-Free" Bell-Type Theorems"
• Authors: Justo Pastor Lambare
• Abstract summary: Marek Czachor claims that the Bell inequality cannot be proved because variables of complementary measurements cannot be added or multiplied. He has correctly identified the problems existing with the orthodox interpretation of the Bell inequality and dealt with them in an original way. The interpretation he addresses do not pertain to the original formulation given by John Stewart Bell.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In a recent article (Found Sci (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09666-0) Marek Czachor claims that the Bell inequality cannot be proved because variables of complementary measurements cannot be added or multiplied. Even though he has correctly identified the problems existing with the orthodox interpretation of the Bell inequality and dealt with them in an original way, the interpretation he addresses do not pertain to the original formulation given by John Stewart Bell.

Related papers

• Loophole-free Bell inequality violations cannot disprove local realism [0.0]
  We argue that Bell inequalities cannot follow from local-realism alone. The proof is given by constructing three local-realist models that entail Bell inequality violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T15:18:41Z)
• Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities [55.2480439325792]
  Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that the time series of outcomes observed in one station does not change if the setting in the other station is changed. In this paper, Sica's approach is extended to series with non ideal efficiency and to the actual time structure of experimental data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T13:59:52Z)
• Is a spectrograph of hidden variables possible? [91.3755431537592]
  "Spectrograph's Realism", and "Locality", are proven to be different, and both necessary, hypotheses to derive Bell's inequalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T13:59:08Z)
• Connes implies Tsirelson: a simple proof [91.3755431537592]
  We show that the Connes embedding problem implies the synchronous Tsirelson conjecture. We also give a different construction of Connes' algebra $mathcalRomega$ appearing in the Connes embedding problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T13:59:42Z)
• Kupczynski's Contextual Locally Causal Probabilistic Models are constrained by Bell's theorem [0.0]
  Kupczynski has argued that Bell's theorem can be circumvented if one takes correct account of contextual setting-dependent parameters describing measuring instruments. We show that this is not true. Even if one takes account of contextuality in the way he suggests, the Bell-CHSH inequality can still be derived.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-21T17:44:30Z)
• On the Unconditional Validity of J. von Neumann's Proof of the Impossibility of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  I show that Neumann's assumption of the linear additivity of the expectation values, even for incompatible (noncommuting) observables, is a necessary constraint. I show that it is Bell's counter-example that is fundamentally flawed, being inconsistent with the factual mechanics. I identify the uncertainty in the action as the reason for the irreducible dispersion, which implies that there are no dispersion-free ensembles at any scale of mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T13:36:08Z)
• Reply to Comment on "Strong Quantum Darwinism and Strong Independence are Equivalent to Spectrum Broadcast Structure" [77.34726150561087]
  In a recent comment [Feller et. al. arXiv:2101.09186] on our Letter [Phys. Lett. 122, 010403], Feller et. al identified a mistake in our mathematical expression of "strong independence" for states that satisfy Spectrum Broadcast Structure. We concede that we wrote a mathematical condition that is necessary but not sufficient. However, we used the original and correct qualitative definition for "strong independence" throughout the paper and in our proofs, therefore the proofs and statements, aside from the aforementioned mathematical expression, remain correct.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-26T12:55:49Z)
• Response to Comment on "A Loophole of All "Loophole-Free" Bell-Type Theorems", by J.P. Lambare [0.0]
  In non-Newtonian calculus, an integral is typically given by a nonlinear map. All the standard proofs of Bell-type inequalities fail if non-Newtonian hidden variables are taken into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-27T04:38:02Z)
• Non-Boolean Hidden Variables model reproduces Quantum Mechanics' predictions for Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
  Theory aimed to violate Bell's inequalities must start by giving up Boolean logic. "Hard" problem is to predict the time values when single particles are detected. "Soft" problem is to explain the violation of Bell's inequalities within (non-Boolean) Local Realism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T21:46:35Z)
• Bell's theorem for trajectories [62.997667081978825]
  A trajectory is not an outcome of a quantum measurement, in the sense that there is no observable associated with it. We show how to overcome this problem by considering a special case of our generic inequality that can be experimentally tested point-by-point in time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-03T01:40:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.