Explainable Predictive Process Monitoring
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.01807v2
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:03:08 GMT
- Title: Explainable Predictive Process Monitoring
- Authors: Riccardo Galanti, Bernat Coma-Puig, Massimiliano de Leoni, Josep
Carmona, Nicol\`o Navarin
- Abstract summary: This paper tackles the problem of equipping predictive business process monitoring with explanation capabilities.
We use the game theory of Shapley Values to obtain robust explanations of the predictions.
The approach has been implemented and tested on real-life benchmarks, showing for the first time how explanations can be given in the field of predictive business process monitoring.
- Score: 0.5564793925574796
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Predictive Business Process Monitoring is becoming an essential aid for
organizations, providing online operational support of their processes. This
paper tackles the fundamental problem of equipping predictive business process
monitoring with explanation capabilities, so that not only the what but also
the why is reported when predicting generic KPIs like remaining time, or
activity execution. We use the game theory of Shapley Values to obtain robust
explanations of the predictions. The approach has been implemented and tested
on real-life benchmarks, showing for the first time how explanations can be
given in the field of predictive business process monitoring.
Related papers
- Achieving Fairness in Predictive Process Analytics via Adversarial Learning [50.31323204077591]
This paper addresses the challenge of integrating a debiasing phase into predictive business process analytics.
Our framework leverages on adversial debiasing is evaluated on four case studies, showing a significant reduction in the contribution of biased variables to the predicted value.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T15:56:03Z) - Explanatory Model Monitoring to Understand the Effects of Feature Shifts on Performance [61.06245197347139]
We propose a novel approach to explain the behavior of a black-box model under feature shifts.
We refer to our method that combines concepts from Optimal Transport and Shapley Values as Explanatory Performance Estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-24T18:28:19Z) - Generating Feasible and Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Outcome Prediction of Business Processes [45.502284864662585]
We introduce a data-driven approach, REVISEDplus, to generate plausible counterfactual explanations.
First, we restrict the counterfactual algorithm to generate counterfactuals that lie within a high-density region of the process data.
We also ensure plausibility by learning sequential patterns between the activities in the process cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T09:56:35Z) - An Explainable Decision Support System for Predictive Process Analytics [0.41562334038629595]
This paper proposes a predictive analytics framework that is also equipped with explanation capabilities based on the game theory of Shapley Values.
The framework has been implemented in the IBM Process Mining suite and commercialized for business users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-26T09:55:49Z) - What Should I Know? Using Meta-gradient Descent for Predictive Feature
Discovery in a Single Stream of Experience [63.75363908696257]
computational reinforcement learning seeks to construct an agent's perception of the world through predictions of future sensations.
An open challenge in this line of work is determining from the infinitely many predictions that the agent could possibly make which predictions might best support decision-making.
We introduce a meta-gradient descent process by which an agent learns what predictions to make, 2) the estimates for its chosen predictions, and 3) how to use those estimates to generate policies that maximize future reward.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-13T21:31:06Z) - Predictive Compliance Monitoring in Process-Aware Information Systems:
State of the Art, Functionalities, Research Directions [0.0]
Business process compliance is a key area of business process management.
Process compliance can be checked during process design time based on verification of process models.
For existing compliance monitoring approaches it remains unclear whether and how compliance violations can be predicted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-10T13:38:56Z) - Event Log Sampling for Predictive Monitoring [0.3425341633647624]
This paper proposes an instance selection procedure that allows sampling training process instances for prediction models.
We show that our sampling method allows for a significant increase of training speed for next activity prediction methods while maintaining reliable levels of prediction accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-04T13:36:48Z) - Explainability in Process Outcome Prediction: Guidelines to Obtain
Interpretable and Faithful Models [77.34726150561087]
We define explainability through the interpretability of the explanations and the faithfulness of the explainability model in the field of process outcome prediction.
This paper contributes a set of guidelines named X-MOP which allows selecting the appropriate model based on the event log specifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-30T05:59:50Z) - Prescriptive Process Monitoring: Quo Vadis? [64.39761523935613]
The paper studies existing methods in this field via a Systematic Literature Review ( SLR)
The SLR provides insights into challenges and areas for future research that could enhance the usefulness and applicability of prescriptive process monitoring methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-03T08:06:24Z) - Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring for Recommending Next Best
Actions [0.0]
Predictive business process monitoring (PBPM) techniques predict future process behaviour based on historical event log data.
Recent PBPM techniques use state-of-the-art deep neural networks (DNNs) to learn predictive models for producing more accurate predictions.
We present a PrBPM technique that transforms the next most likely activities into the next best actions regarding a given.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-19T22:33:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.