Predictive Compliance Monitoring in Process-Aware Information Systems: State of the Art, Functionalities, Research Directions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.05446v1
• Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 13:38:56 GMT
• Title: Predictive Compliance Monitoring in Process-Aware Information Systems: State of the Art, Functionalities, Research Directions
• Authors: Stefanie Rinderle-Ma and Karolin Winter
• Abstract summary: Business process compliance is a key area of business process management. Process compliance can be checked during process design time based on verification of process models. For existing compliance monitoring approaches it remains unclear whether and how compliance violations can be predicted.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Business process compliance is a key area of business process management and aims at ensuring that processes obey to compliance constraints such as regulatory constraints or business rules imposed on them. Process compliance can be checked during process design time based on verification of process models and at runtime based on monitoring the compliance states of running process instances. For existing compliance monitoring approaches it remains unclear whether and how compliance violations can be predicted, although predictions are crucial in order to prepare and take countermeasures in time. This work, hence, analyzes existing literature from compliance and SLA monitoring as well as predictive process monitoring and provides an updated framework of compliance monitoring functionalities. For each compliance monitoring functionality we elicit prediction requirements and analyze their coverage by existing approaches. Based on this analysis, open challenges and research directions for predictive compliance and process monitoring are elaborated.

Related papers

• Do We Need to Verify Step by Step? Rethinking Process Supervision from a Theoretical Perspective [59.61868506896214]
  We show that under standard data coverage assumptions, reinforcement learning is no more statistically difficult than through process supervision. We prove that any policy's advantage function can serve as an optimal process reward model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T22:21:56Z)
• Federated Conformance Checking [0.1433758865948252]
  Conformance checking is a crucial aspect of process mining, where the main objective is to compare the execution of a process. We propose a privacy-aware federated conformance-checking approach that allows for evaluating the correctness of overall cross-organizational process models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T11:30:13Z)
• Extending predictive process monitoring for collaborative processes [0.9208007322096533]
  Predictive process monitoring is based on exploiting execution data from past instances to predict the execution of current cases. It is possible to make predictions on the next activity and remaining time, among others, to anticipate possible deviations, violations, and delays in the processes to take preventive measures. In this work, we propose an extension for collaborative processes of traditional process prediction, considering particularities of this type of process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T21:56:23Z)
• RIRAG: Regulatory Information Retrieval and Answer Generation [51.998738311700095]
  We introduce a task of generating question-passages pairs, where questions are automatically created and paired with relevant regulatory passages. We create the ObliQA dataset, containing 27,869 questions derived from the collection of Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) financial regulation documents. We design a baseline Regulatory Information Retrieval and Answer Generation (RIRAG) system and evaluate it with RePASs, a novel evaluation metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T14:44:19Z)
• Defining and executing temporal constraints for evaluating engineering artifact compliance [56.08728135126139]
  Process compliance focuses on ensuring that the actual engineering work is followed as closely as possible to the described engineering processes. Checking these process constraints is still a daunting task that requires a lot of manual work and delivers feedback to engineers only late in the process. We present an automated constraint checking approach that can incrementally check temporal constraints across inter-related engineering artifacts upon every artifact change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T13:26:31Z)
• Conformance Checking with Uncertainty via SMT (Extended Version) [66.58864135810981]
  We show how to solve the problem of checking conformance of uncertain logs against data-aware reference processes. Our approach is modular, in that it homogeneously accommodates for different types of uncertainty. We show the correctness of our approach and witness feasibility through a proof-of-concept implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T11:39:45Z)
• Prescriptive Process Monitoring: Quo Vadis? [64.39761523935613]
  The paper studies existing methods in this field via a Systematic Literature Review ( SLR) The SLR provides insights into challenges and areas for future research that could enhance the usefulness and applicability of prescriptive process monitoring methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T08:06:24Z)
• Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and Process Mining: Challenges and Opportunities [0.8602553195689513]
  We show that process mining can provide a useful framework for gaining fact-based visibility to AI compliance process execution. We provide for an automated approach to analyze, remediate and monitor uncertainty in AI regulatory compliance processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-06T12:50:47Z)
• CoCoMoT: Conformance Checking of Multi-Perspective Processes via SMT (Extended Version) [62.96267257163426]
  We introduce the CoCoMoT (Computing Conformance Modulo Theories) framework. First, we show how SAT-based encodings studied in the pure control-flow setting can be lifted to our data-aware case. Second, we introduce a novel preprocessing technique based on a notion of property-preserving clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T20:22:50Z)
• Explainable Predictive Process Monitoring [0.5564793925574796]
  This paper tackles the problem of equipping predictive business process monitoring with explanation capabilities. We use the game theory of Shapley Values to obtain robust explanations of the predictions. The approach has been implemented and tested on real-life benchmarks, showing for the first time how explanations can be given in the field of predictive business process monitoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T20:09:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.