Unobservable entities in QBism and phenomenology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.14302v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 21:42:04 GMT
• Title: Unobservable entities in QBism and phenomenology
• Authors: Jacques L. Pienaar
• Abstract summary: We argue that QBism's "experiences" are synonymous with the concept of "perceived phenomena" in phenomenology. This suggests an approach to ontology in which objects can only be physically real if they are in principle observable.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The interpretation of quantum theory known as QBism argues that many elements of the formalism have a subjective interpretation. At the same time, QBism claims to be a broadly realist program. This implies that reality in QBism must be somehow founded upon an agent's subjective experiences (measurement outcomes). To make this idea more precise, we propose to interpret QBism's "experiences" as synonymous with the concept of "perceived phenomena" in phenomenology. This suggests an approach to ontology in which objects can only be physically real if they are in principle observable. But what does "observable" mean? Are atoms, electromagnetic fields, quantum states, or probabilities observable? Here we discuss the different answers to this question given by QBists and phenomenologists, and attempt to reconcile them.

Related papers

• Quantum Probabilities Are Objective Degrees of Epistemic Justification [0.0]
  QBism is one of the most widely discussed'subjective' interpretations of quantum mechanics. This paper takes QBism as a starting point, but allows objectivity to enter from the get-go.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T22:07:34Z)
• The two-spin enigma: from the helium atom to quantum ontology [1.6777183511743472]
  We will show that it perfectly fits with empirical evidence, and can be maintained without giving up physical realism. We will start from experimentally based evidence in order to analyse and explain physical facts, moving cautiously from a classical to a quantum description, without mixing them up. The overall picture will be that the physical properties of microscopic systems are quantized, as initially shown by Planck and Einstein, and they are also contextual, i.e. that they can be given a physical sense only by embedding a microscopic system within a macroscopic measurement context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T09:43:30Z)
• Perspectival Quantum Realism [0.0]
  We argue that the problems identified by QBism and Quantum Pragmatism do not necessitate abandoning the ideal of representing the physical world. We can avail ourselves of the same puzzle-solving strategies as employed by QBists and pragmatists by adopting a emphperspectival quantum realism
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T16:23:54Z)
• Inevitability of knowing less than nothing [5.767156832161818]
  In the classical world, entropy and conditional entropy take only non-negative values. We introduce a physically motivated framework for defining quantum conditional entropy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T17:44:17Z)
• Abstract interpretation, Hoare logic, and incorrectness logic for quantum programs [6.2147758224415055]
  Hoare logic, and incorrectness (or reverse Hoare) logic are powerful techniques for static analysis of computer programs. We show that any complete quantum abstract interpretation induces a quantum Hoare logic and a quantum incorrectness logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T05:49:55Z)
• Does Science need Intersubjectivity? The Problem of Confirmation in Orthodox Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We argue that any successful interpretation of quantum mechanics must explain how our empirical evidence allows us to come to know about quantum mechanics. We take a detailed look at the way in which belief-updating might work in the kind of universe postulated by an orthodox interpretation. We argue that in some versions of these interpretations it is not even possible to use one's own relative frequencies for empirical confirmation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T13:14:34Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Testing quantum theory with thought experiments [4.847980206213335]
  How should one model systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory? We give a state-of-the-art overview on quantum thought experiments involving observers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T18:08:23Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• The view from a Wigner bubble [0.0]
  I argue that the key distinction between QBism and realist interpretations of quantum mechanics is best understood in terms of their adherence to different theories of truth. The notion of reality afforded by QBism will correspond to the invariant elements of any theory that has pragmatic value to all rational agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T04:21:33Z)
• QBism Is Not So Simply Dismissed [0.0]
  We evaluate the plausibility of recent criticism of QBism. We focus on the consequences of the subjective character of the quantum state, the issue of realism and the problem of the evolution of the quantum state in QBism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T11:38:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.