Breaking the Communities: Characterizing community changing users using
text mining and graph machine learning on Twitter
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.10749v2
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:47:25 GMT
- Title: Breaking the Communities: Characterizing community changing users using
text mining and graph machine learning on Twitter
- Authors: Federico Albanese, Leandro Lombardi, Esteban Feuerstein, Pablo
Balenzuela
- Abstract summary: We study users who break their community on Twitter using natural language processing techniques and graph machine learning algorithms.
We collected 9 million Twitter messages from 1.5 million users and constructed the retweet networks.
We present a machine learning framework for social media users classification which detects "community breakers"
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Even though the Internet and social media have increased the amount of news
and information people can consume, most users are only exposed to content that
reinforces their positions and isolates them from other ideological
communities. This environment has real consequences with great impact on our
lives like severe political polarization, easy spread of fake news, political
extremism, hate groups and the lack of enriching debates, among others.
Therefore, encouraging conversations between different groups of users and
breaking the closed community is of importance for healthy societies. In this
paper, we characterize and study users who break their community on Twitter
using natural language processing techniques and graph machine learning
algorithms. In particular, we collected 9 million Twitter messages from 1.5
million users and constructed the retweet networks. We identified their
communities and topics of discussion associated to them. With this data, we
present a machine learning framework for social media users classification
which detects "community breakers", i.e. users that swing from their closed
community to another one. A feature importance analysis in three Twitter
polarized political datasets showed that these users have low values of
PageRank, suggesting that changes are driven because their messages have no
response in their communities. This methodology also allowed us to identify
their specific topics of interest, providing a fully characterization of this
kind of users.
Related papers
- Incentivizing News Consumption on Social Media Platforms Using Large Language Models and Realistic Bot Accounts [4.06613683722116]
This project examines how to enhance users' exposure to and engagement with verified and ideologically balanced news on Twitter.
We created 28 bots that replied to users tweeting about sports, entertainment, or lifestyle with a contextual reply.
To test differential effects by gender of the bots, treated users were randomly assigned to receive responses by bots presented as female or male.
We find that the treated users followed more news accounts and the users in the female bot treatment were more likely to like news content than the control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-20T07:44:06Z) - Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers
and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years.
We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z) - Trust and Believe -- Should We? Evaluating the Trustworthiness of
Twitter Users [5.695742189917657]
Fake news on social media is a major problem with far-reaching negative repercussions on both individuals and society.
In this work, we create a model through which we hope to offer a solution that will instill trust in social network communities.
Our model analyses the behaviour of 50,000 politicians on Twitter and assigns an influence score for each evaluated user.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-27T06:57:19Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Community evolution in retweet networks [0.45880283710344055]
We propose an approach that tracks two aspects of community evolution in retweet networks: flow of the members in, out and between the communities, and their influence.
For community detection, we propose a two-stage approach. In the first stage, we apply an enhanced Louvain algorithm, called Ensemble Louvain, to find stable communities.
For the detected communities, we compute internal and external influence, and for individual users, the retweet h-index influence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-13T12:08:28Z) - Analysing Social Media Network Data with R: Semi-Automated Screening of
Users, Comments and Communication Patterns [0.0]
Communication on social media platforms is increasingly widespread across societies.
Fake news, hate speech and radicalizing elements are part of this modern form of communication.
A basic understanding of these mechanisms and communication patterns could help to counteract negative forms of communication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-26T14:52:01Z) - Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news.
In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities.
We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z) - Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal.
Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z) - Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media
during the COVID-19 Crisis [51.39895377836919]
COVID-19 has sparked racism and hate on social media targeted towards Asian communities.
We study the evolution and spread of anti-Asian hate speech through the lens of Twitter.
We create COVID-HATE, the largest dataset of anti-Asian hate and counterspeech spanning 14 months.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-25T21:58:09Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.