Computer Assisted Translation with Neural Quality Estimation and Automatic Post-Editing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09126v2
• Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:23:25 GMT
• Title: Computer Assisted Translation with Neural Quality Estimation and Automatic Post-Editing
• Authors: Jiayi Wang, Ke Wang, Niyu Ge, Yangbing Shi, Yu Zhao, Kai Fan
• Abstract summary: We propose an end-to-end deep learning framework of the quality estimation and automatic post-editing of the machine translation output. Our goal is to provide error correction suggestions and to further relieve the burden of human translators through an interpretable model.
• Score: 18.192546537421673
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the advent of neural machine translation, there has been a marked shift towards leveraging and consuming the machine translation results. However, the gap between machine translation systems and human translators needs to be manually closed by post-editing. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end deep learning framework of the quality estimation and automatic post-editing of the machine translation output. Our goal is to provide error correction suggestions and to further relieve the burden of human translators through an interpretable model. To imitate the behavior of human translators, we design three efficient delegation modules -- quality estimation, generative post-editing, and atomic operation post-editing and construct a hierarchical model based on them. We examine this approach with the English--German dataset from WMT 2017 APE shared task and our experimental results can achieve the state-of-the-art performance. We also verify that the certified translators can significantly expedite their post-editing processing with our model in human evaluation.

Related papers

• Contextual Refinement of Translations: Large Language Models for Sentence and Document-Level Post-Editing [12.843274390224853]
  Large Language Models (LLM's) have demonstrated considerable success in various Natural Language Processing tasks. We show that they have yet to attain state-of-the-art performance in Neural Machine Translation. We propose adapting LLM's as Automatic Post-Editors (APE) rather than direct translators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T12:22:15Z)
• The Devil is in the Errors: Leveraging Large Language Models for Fine-grained Machine Translation Evaluation [93.01964988474755]
  AutoMQM is a prompting technique which asks large language models to identify and categorize errors in translations. We study the impact of labeled data through in-context learning and finetuning. We then evaluate AutoMQM with PaLM-2 models, and we find that it improves performance compared to just prompting for scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T17:17:21Z)
• The Best of Both Worlds: Combining Human and Machine Translations for Multilingual Semantic Parsing with Active Learning [50.320178219081484]
  We propose an active learning approach that exploits the strengths of both human and machine translations. An ideal utterance selection can significantly reduce the error and bias in the translated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T05:57:47Z)
• HanoiT: Enhancing Context-aware Translation via Selective Context [95.93730812799798]
  Context-aware neural machine translation aims to use the document-level context to improve translation quality. The irrelevant or trivial words may bring some noise and distract the model from learning the relationship between the current sentence and the auxiliary context. We propose a novel end-to-end encoder-decoder model with a layer-wise selection mechanism to sift and refine the long document context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-17T12:07:13Z)
• Competency-Aware Neural Machine Translation: Can Machine Translation Know its Own Translation Quality? [61.866103154161884]
  Neural machine translation (NMT) is often criticized for failures that happen without awareness. We propose a novel competency-aware NMT by extending conventional NMT with a self-estimator. We show that the proposed method delivers outstanding performance on quality estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T02:39:41Z)
• Easy Guided Decoding in Providing Suggestions for Interactive Machine Translation [14.615314828955288]
  We propose a novel constrained decoding algorithm, namely Prefix Suffix Guided Decoding (PSGD) PSGD improves translation quality by an average of $10.87$ BLEU and $8.62$ BLEU on the WeTS and the WMT 2022 Translation Suggestion datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T03:40:02Z)
• DivEMT: Neural Machine Translation Post-Editing Effort Across Typologically Diverse Languages [5.367993194110256]
  DivEMT is the first publicly available post-editing study of Neural Machine Translation (NMT) over a typologically diverse set of target languages. We assess the impact on translation productivity of two state-of-the-art NMT systems, namely: Google Translate and the open-source multilingual model mBART50.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T17:22:52Z)
• Improving Multilingual Translation by Representation and Gradient Regularization [82.42760103045083]
  We propose a joint approach to regularize NMT models at both representation-level and gradient-level. Our results demonstrate that our approach is highly effective in both reducing off-target translation occurrences and improving zero-shot translation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T10:52:21Z)
• ChrEnTranslate: Cherokee-English Machine Translation Demo with Quality Estimation and Corrective Feedback [70.5469946314539]
  ChrEnTranslate is an online machine translation demonstration system for translation between English and an endangered language Cherokee. It supports both statistical and neural translation models as well as provides quality estimation to inform users of reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-30T17:58:54Z)
• Detecting over/under-translation errors for determining adequacy in human translations [0.0]
  We present a novel approach to detecting over and under translations (OT/UT) as part of adequacy error checks in translation evaluation. We do not restrict ourselves to machine translation (MT) outputs and specifically target applications with human generated translation pipeline. The goal of our system is to identify OT/UT errors from human translated video subtitles with high error recall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-01T06:06:36Z)
• Learning to Detect Unacceptable Machine Translations for Downstream Tasks [33.07594909221625]
  We put machine translation in a cross-lingual pipeline and introduce downstream tasks to define task-specific acceptability of machine translations. This allows us to leverage parallel data to automatically generate acceptability annotations on a large scale. We conduct experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework for a range of downstream tasks and translation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-08T09:37:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.