Superdeterminism: A Guide for the Perplexed
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01324v2
- Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 09:26:31 GMT
- Title: Superdeterminism: A Guide for the Perplexed
- Authors: Sabine Hossenfelder
- Abstract summary: Superdeterminism is the only known consistent description of nature that is local, deterministic, and can give rise to the observed correlations of quantum mechanics.
I explain why superdeterminism is not a threat to science, is not necessarily finetuned, what the relevance of future input is, and what the open problems are.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Superdeterminism is presently the only known consistent description of nature
that is local, deterministic, and can give rise to the observed correlations of
quantum mechanics. I here want to explain what makes this approach promising
and offer the reader some advice for how to avoid common pitfalls. In
particular, I explain why superdeterminism is not a threat to science, is not
necessarily finetuned, what the relevance of future input is, and what the open
problems are.
Related papers
- Proposal of an optical Bell's experiment to test the boundary between determinism and indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics [41.94295877935867]
It was recently noted the existence of an apparently discontinuous boundary between determinism and indeterminism in Quantum Mechanics.
We propose to explore this boundary by recording the distribution of outcomes of a given parity interrupted by outcomes of the other parity.
The features of these distributions for small rotations of the angle settings near critical points may indicate whether the underlying process is in-deterministic or not.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-20T14:48:08Z) - An axiomatic limitation on the deterministic scope required for
superdeterminism and its consequentially greater likelihood [0.5439020425818999]
I use an axiomatic formulation of superdeterminism to demonstrate that Bell overstated the scope of determinism required.
Assuming only the existence of a universe containing observers, I show that determinism in just the observer scope is sufficient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-27T00:55:45Z) - Epistemic Boundaries and Quantum Uncertainty: What Local Observers Can (Not) Predict [0.0]
We argue that post-quantum theories can offer a predictive advantage while conforming to the Born rule on average.
We uncover a fascinating possibility: When the assumption of reliable intersubjectivity between different observers is violated, subjective predictive advantage can, in principle, exist.
The findings reconcile us to quantum uncertainty as an aspect of limits on Nature's predictability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T14:09:18Z) - Explaining Emergence [0.0]
Emergence is a subjective property relative to the observer.
Some mathematical systems having very simple and deterministic rules nevertheless show emergent behavior.
Computational irreducibility is a key for understanding emergent phenomena from an objective point of view.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-20T20:31:46Z) - Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions.
We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z) - A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality.
Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z) - Non-Determinism and the Lawlessness of Machine Learning Code [43.662736664344095]
We show that the effects of non-determinism, and consequently its implications for the law, become clearer from the perspective of reasoning about ML outputs as distributions over possible outcomes.
We conclude with a brief discussion of what work ML can do to constrain the potentially harm-inducing effects of non-determinism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-23T17:05:34Z) - Aspects of Superdeterminism Made Intuitive [0.0]
We show that superdeterministic correlations may exist as a matter of principle, but be undetectable for all practical purposes.
We also show that probability theory, as a physical theory, indicates that superdeterminism has a greater explanatory power than its competitors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-21T14:59:06Z) - The Future of Quantum Theory: A Way Out of the Impasse [0.0]
We argue that a simple, albeit somewhat uncomfortable shift of viewpoint leads to a way out of the impossibility to extend the theory beyond indeterminism.
The paradigm shift involves a non-trivial relaxation of the commonly accepted mathematical definition of free choice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-02T15:45:47Z) - Quantum Causal Inference in the Presence of Hidden Common Causes: an
Entropic Approach [34.77250498401055]
We put forth a new theoretical framework for merging quantum information science and causal inference by exploiting entropic principles.
We apply our proposed framework to an experimentally relevant scenario of identifying message senders on quantum noisy links.
This approach can lay the foundations of identifying originators of malicious activity on future multi-node quantum networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-24T22:45:50Z) - Non-Boolean Hidden Variables model reproduces Quantum Mechanics'
predictions for Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
Theory aimed to violate Bell's inequalities must start by giving up Boolean logic.
"Hard" problem is to predict the time values when single particles are detected.
"Soft" problem is to explain the violation of Bell's inequalities within (non-Boolean) Local Realism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-20T21:46:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.