Explaining Emergence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10912v1
• Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 20:31:46 GMT
• Title: Explaining Emergence
• Authors: Herv\'e Zwirn
• Abstract summary: Emergence is a subjective property relative to the observer. Some mathematical systems having very simple and deterministic rules nevertheless show emergent behavior. Computational irreducibility is a key for understanding emergent phenomena from an objective point of view.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Emergence is a pregnant property in various fields. It is the fact for a phenomenon to appear surprisingly and to be such that it seems at first sight that it is not possible to predict its apparition. That is the reason why it has often been said that emergence is a subjective property relative to the observer. Some mathematical systems having very simple and deterministic rules nevertheless show emergent behavior. Studying these systems shed a new light on the subject and allows to define a new concept, computational irreducibility, which deals with behaviors that even though they are totally deterministic cannot be predicted without simulating them. Computational irreducibility is then a key for understanding emergent phenomena from an objective point of view that does not need the mention of any observer.

Related papers

• Interpretability Needs a New Paradigm [49.134097841837715]
  Interpretability is the study of explaining models in understandable terms to humans. At the core of this debate is how each paradigm ensures its explanations are faithful, i.e., true to the model's behavior. This paper's position is that we should think about new paradigms while staying vigilant regarding faithfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T19:31:06Z)
• Quantum panprotopsychism and the combination problem [0.0]
  We will argue that a phenomenological analysis of consciousness, similar to that of Husserl, shows that the effects of phenomenal qualities shape our perception of the world. It also shows the way the physical and mathematical sciences operate, allowing us to accurately describe the observed regularities in terms of communicable mathematical laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T19:17:28Z)
• What does it mean to represent? Mental representations as falsifiable memory patterns [8.430851504111585]
  We argue that causal and teleological approaches fail to provide a satisfactory account of representation. We sketch an alternative according to which representations correspond to inferred latent structures in the world. These structures are assumed to have certain properties objectively, which allows for planning, prediction, and detection of unexpected events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-06T12:52:42Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Abstract Spatial-Temporal Reasoning via Probabilistic Abduction and Execution [97.50813120600026]
  Spatial-temporal reasoning is a challenging task in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Recent works have focused on an abstract reasoning task of this kind -- Raven's Progressive Matrices ( RPM) We propose a neuro-symbolic Probabilistic Abduction and Execution learner (PrAE) learner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:18Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Probability, Preclusion and Biological Evolution in Heisenberg-Picture Everett Quantum Mechanics [0.07614628596146598]
  Hard preclusion can provide an explanation for biological evolution. It can also explain our subjective experiences of, and reactions to, "ordinary" probabilistic phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T18:51:04Z)
• Undecidability and unpredictability: not limitations, but triumphs of science [0.0]
  It is a widespread belief that results like G"odel's incompleteness theorems represent fundamental limitations to humanity's strive for scientific knowledge. I argue that this view is wrong. It originates in a naive form of metaphysics that sees the physical and Platonic worlds as a collection of things with definite properties. I argue to replace this perspective by a worldview in which a structural notion of real patterns', not things' are regarded as fundamental.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-22T12:08:06Z)
• A minimalist's view of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  We analyse a proposition which considers quantum theory as a mere tool for calculating probabilities for sequences of outcomes of observations made by an Observer. Predictions are possible, provided a sequence includes at least two such observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T13:00:00Z)
• Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
  We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations. We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.