Aspects of Superdeterminism Made Intuitive
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10616v1
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 14:59:06 GMT
- Title: Aspects of Superdeterminism Made Intuitive
- Authors: Vitaly Nikolaev, Louis Vervoort
- Abstract summary: We show that superdeterministic correlations may exist as a matter of principle, but be undetectable for all practical purposes.
We also show that probability theory, as a physical theory, indicates that superdeterminism has a greater explanatory power than its competitors.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We attempt to make superdeterminism more intuitive, notably by simulating a
deterministic model system, a billiard game. In this system an initial 'bang'
correlates all events, just as in the superdeterministic universe. We introduce
the notions of 'strong' and 'soft' superdeterminism, in order to clarify
debates in the literature. Based on the analogy with billiards, we show that
superdeterministic correlations may exist as a matter of principle, but be
undetectable for all practical purposes. This allows us to counter classical
objections to superdeterminism such as the claim that it would be at odds with
the scientific method, and with the construction of new theories. Finally, we
show that probability theory, as a physical theory, indicates that
superdeterminism has a greater explanatory power than its competitors: it can
coherently answer questions for which other positions remain powerless.
Related papers
- Machine learning and information theory concepts towards an AI
Mathematician [77.63761356203105]
The current state-of-the-art in artificial intelligence is impressive, especially in terms of mastery of language, but not so much in terms of mathematical reasoning.
This essay builds on the idea that current deep learning mostly succeeds at system 1 abilities.
It takes an information-theoretical posture to ask questions about what constitutes an interesting mathematical statement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T15:12:06Z) - Betting on what is neither verifiable nor falsifiable [18.688474183114085]
We propose an approach to betting on such events via options, or equivalently as bets on the outcome of a "verification-falsification game"
Our work thus acts as an alternative to the existing framework of Garrabrant induction for logical uncertainty, and relates to the stance known as constructivism in the philosophy of mathematics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T17:30:34Z) - An axiomatic limitation on the deterministic scope required for
superdeterminism and its consequentially greater likelihood [0.5439020425818999]
I use an axiomatic formulation of superdeterminism to demonstrate that Bell overstated the scope of determinism required.
Assuming only the existence of a universe containing observers, I show that determinism in just the observer scope is sufficient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-27T00:55:45Z) - A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality.
Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z) - Strong Determinism [0.0]
A strongly deterministic theory of physics permits exactly one possible history of the universe.
A surprising consequence is that whether or not our world is strongly deterministic may be empirically underdetermined.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-06T06:13:04Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - The Future of Quantum Theory: A Way Out of the Impasse [0.0]
We argue that a simple, albeit somewhat uncomfortable shift of viewpoint leads to a way out of the impossibility to extend the theory beyond indeterminism.
The paradigm shift involves a non-trivial relaxation of the commonly accepted mathematical definition of free choice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-02T15:45:47Z) - Uncertainty measures: The big picture [7.655239948659381]
We show that a wide array of theories of uncertainty have been proposed, many of them generalisations of classical probability.
Our goal is a critical appraisal of the current landscape in uncertainty theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-14T13:11:20Z) - Superdeterminism: A Guide for the Perplexed [0.0]
Superdeterminism is the only known consistent description of nature that is local, deterministic, and can give rise to the observed correlations of quantum mechanics.
I explain why superdeterminism is not a threat to science, is not necessarily finetuned, what the relevance of future input is, and what the open problems are.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-03T11:16:16Z) - Logic, Probability and Action: A Situation Calculus Perspective [12.47276164048813]
The unification of logic and probability is a long-standing concern in AI.
We explore recent results pertaining to the integration of logic, probability and actions in the situation calculus.
Results are motivated in the context of cognitive robotics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-17T13:49:53Z) - Indeterminism, causality and information: Has physics ever been
deterministic? [0.0]
We show that there exist alternative stories to be told in which classical mechanics can be interpreted as a fundamentally indeterministic theory.
On the one hand, this leaves room for the many possibilities of an open future, yet, it brings into classical physics some of the conceptual issues typical of quantum mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-16T19:05:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.