Detecting Misclassification Errors in Neural Networks with a Gaussian Process Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.02065v4
• Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 15:31:29 GMT
• Title: Detecting Misclassification Errors in Neural Networks with a Gaussian Process Model
• Authors: Xin Qiu, Risto Miikkulainen
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a new framework that produces a quantitative metric for detecting misclassification errors. The framework, RED, builds an error detector on top of the base classifier and estimates uncertainty of the detection scores using Gaussian Processes.
• Score: 20.948038514886377
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As neural network classifiers are deployed in real-world applications, it is crucial that their failures can be detected reliably. One practical solution is to assign confidence scores to each prediction, then use these scores to filter out possible misclassifications. However, existing confidence metrics are not yet sufficiently reliable for this role. This paper presents a new framework that produces a quantitative metric for detecting misclassification errors. This framework, RED, builds an error detector on top of the base classifier and estimates uncertainty of the detection scores using Gaussian Processes. Experimental comparisons with other error detection methods on 125 UCI datasets demonstrate that this approach is effective. Further implementations on two probabilistic base classifiers and two large deep learning architecture in vision tasks further confirm that the method is robust and scalable. Third, an empirical analysis of RED with out-of-distribution and adversarial samples shows that the method can be used not only to detect errors but also to understand where they come from. RED can thereby be used to improve trustworthiness of neural network classifiers more broadly in the future.

Related papers

• Typicalness-Aware Learning for Failure Detection [26.23185979968123]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) often suffer from the overconfidence issue, where incorrect predictions are made with high confidence scores. We propose a novel approach called Typicalness-Aware Learning (TAL) to address this issue and improve failure detection performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T11:09:47Z)
• NUQ: Nonparametric Uncertainty Quantification for Deterministic Neural Networks [151.03112356092575]
  We show the principled way to measure the uncertainty of predictions for a classifier based on Nadaraya-Watson's nonparametric estimate of the conditional label distribution. We demonstrate the strong performance of the method in uncertainty estimation tasks on a variety of real-world image datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T12:30:45Z)
• Efficient and Robust Classification for Sparse Attacks [34.48667992227529]
  We consider perturbations bounded by the $ell$--norm, which have been shown as effective attacks in the domains of image-recognition, natural language processing, and malware-detection. We propose a novel defense method that consists of "truncation" and "adrial training" Motivated by the insights we obtain, we extend these components to neural network classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-23T21:18:17Z)
• Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
  Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators. They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions. We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Deep Calibrated Salient Object Detection [74.58153220370527]
  Existing deep neural network based salient object detection (SOD) methods mainly focus on pursuing high network accuracy. These methods overlook the gap between network accuracy and prediction confidence, known as the confidence uncalibration problem. We introduce an uncertaintyaware deep SOD network, and propose two strategies to prevent deep SOD networks from being overconfident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T23:28:36Z)
• Ramifications of Approximate Posterior Inference for Bayesian Deep Learning in Adversarial and Out-of-Distribution Settings [7.476901945542385]
  We show that Bayesian deep learning models on certain occasions marginally outperform conventional neural networks. Preliminary investigations indicate the potential inherent role of bias due to choices of initialisation, architecture or activation functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-03T16:58:15Z)
• Auto-Classifier: A Robust Defect Detector Based on an AutoML Head [2.685668802278155]
  We show that the use of Convolutional Neural Networks achieves better results than traditional methods. We also show that Auto-Classifier out-performs all other methods, by achieving 100% accuracy and 100% AUC results throughout all the datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-03T10:39:02Z)
• Revisiting One-vs-All Classifiers for Predictive Uncertainty and Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networks [22.34227625637843]
  We investigate how the parametrization of the probabilities in discriminative classifiers affects the uncertainty estimates. We show that one-vs-all formulations can improve calibration on image classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-10T01:55:02Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation Using a Single Deep Deterministic Neural Network [66.26231423824089]
  We propose a method for training a deterministic deep model that can find and reject out of distribution data points at test time with a single forward pass. We scale training in these with a novel loss function and centroid updating scheme and match the accuracy of softmax models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T12:27:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.