My Team Will Go On: Differentiating High and Low Viability Teams through Team Interaction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.07292v2
• Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 22:30:20 GMT
• Title: My Team Will Go On: Differentiating High and Low Viability Teams through Team Interaction
• Authors: Hancheng Cao, Vivian Yang, Victor Chen, Yu Jin Lee, Lydia Stone, N'godjigui Junior Diarrassouba, Mark E. Whiting, Michael S. Bernstein
• Abstract summary: We train a viability classification model over a dataset of 669 10-minute text conversations of online teams. We find that a lasso regression model achieves an accuracy of.74--.92 AUC ROC under different thresholds of classifying viability scores.
• Score: 17.729317295204368
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Understanding team viability -- a team's capacity for sustained and future success -- is essential for building effective teams. In this study, we aggregate features drawn from the organizational behavior literature to train a viability classification model over a dataset of 669 10-minute text conversations of online teams. We train classifiers to identify teams at the top decile (most viable teams), 50th percentile (above a median split), and bottom decile (least viable teams), then characterize the attributes of teams at each of these viability levels. We find that a lasso regression model achieves an accuracy of .74--.92 AUC ROC under different thresholds of classifying viability scores. From these models, we identify the use of exclusive language such as `but' and `except', and the use of second person pronouns, as the most predictive features for detecting the most viable teams, suggesting that active engagement with others' ideas is a crucial signal of a viable team. Only a small fraction of the 10-minute discussion, as little as 70 seconds, is required for predicting the viability of team interaction. This work suggests opportunities for teams to assess, track, and visualize their own viability in real time as they collaborate.

Related papers

• ML-SPEAK: A Theory-Guided Machine Learning Method for Studying and Predicting Conversational Turn-taking Patterns [25.049072387358244]
  We develop a computational model of conversational turn-taking within self-organized teams. By bridging the gap between individual personality traits and team communication patterns, our model has the potential to inform theories of team processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T01:27:01Z)
• Law of the Weakest Link: Cross Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.91861246827797]
  We show that Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit the "Law of the Weakest Link," where cross-capability performance is significantly constrained by the weakest component. These results highlight the under-performance of LLMs in cross-capability tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T05:12:01Z)
• About latent roles in forecasting players in team sports [47.066729480128856]
  Team sports contain a significant social component that influences interactions between teammates and opponents. We create RolFor, a novel end-to-end model for Role-based Forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T13:33:23Z)
• Detecting and Optimising Team Interactions in Software Development [58.720142291102135]
  This paper presents a data-driven approach to detect the functional interaction structure for software development teams. Our approach considers differences in the activity levels of team members and uses a block-constrained configuration model. We show how our approach enables teams to compare their functional interaction structure against synthetically created benchmark scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T14:53:29Z)
• Informational Diversity and Affinity Bias in Team Growth Dynamics [6.729250803621849]
  We show that the benefits of informational diversity are in tension with affinity bias. Our results formalize a fundamental limitation of utility-based motivations to drive informational diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T05:02:40Z)
• Group Activity Recognition in Basketball Tracking Data -- Neural Embeddings in Team Sports (NETS) [10.259254824702554]
  We propose a novel deep learning approach for group activity recognition (GAR) in team sports called NETS. We used a large tracking data set from 632 NBA games to evaluate our approach. The results show that NETS is capable of learning group activities with high accuracy, and that self- and weak-supervised training in NETS have a positive impact on GAR accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-31T01:22:38Z)
• Kill Chaos with Kindness: Agreeableness Improves Team Performance Under Uncertainty [0.0]
  Agreeableness has demonstrated a non-significant and highly variable relationship with team performance. An agent-based model (ABM) is used to predict the effects of personality traits on teamwork. A genetic algorithm is then used to explore the limits of the ABM in order to discover which traits correlate with best and worst performing teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-09T16:04:32Z)
• Unifying Language Learning Paradigms [96.35981503087567]
  We present a unified framework for pre-training models that are universally effective across datasets and setups. We show how different pre-training objectives can be cast as one another and how interpolating between different objectives can be effective. Our model also achieve strong results at in-context learning, outperforming 175B GPT-3 on zero-shot SuperGLUE and tripling the performance of T5-XXL on one-shot summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-10T19:32:20Z)
• Collusion Detection in Team-Based Multiplayer Games [57.153233321515984]
  We propose a system that detects colluding behaviors in team-based multiplayer games. The proposed method analyzes the players' social relationships paired with their in-game behavioral patterns. We then automate the detection using Isolation Forest, an unsupervised learning technique specialized in highlighting outliers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T02:37:39Z)
• Predicting the outcome of team movements -- Player time series analysis using fuzzy and deep methods for representation learning [0.0]
  We provide a framework for the useful encoding of short tactics and space occupations in a more extended sequence of movements or tactical plans. We discuss the effectiveness of the proposed approach for prediction and recognition tasks on the professional basketball SportVU dataset for the 2015-16 half-season.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T18:42:37Z)
• Evaluating and Rewarding Teamwork Using Cooperative Game Abstractions [103.3630903577951]
  We use cooperative game theory to study teams of artificial RL agents as well as real world teams from professional sports. We introduce a parametric model called cooperative game abstractions (CGAs) for estimating CFs from data. We provide identification results and sample bounds complexity for CGA models as well as error bounds in the estimation of the Shapley Value using CGAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T22:03:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.