Automatic Feasibility Study via Data Quality Analysis for ML: A Case-Study on Label Noise

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08410v4
• Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:14:18 GMT
• Title: Automatic Feasibility Study via Data Quality Analysis for ML: A Case-Study on Label Noise
• Authors: Cedric Renggli, Luka Rimanic, Luka Kolar, Wentao Wu, Ce Zhang
• Abstract summary: We present Snoopy, with the goal of supporting data scientists and machine learning engineers performing a systematic and theoretically founded feasibility study. We approach this problem by estimating the irreducible error of the underlying task, also known as the Bayes error rate (BER) We demonstrate in end-to-end experiments how users are able to save substantial labeling time and monetary efforts.
• Score: 21.491392581672198
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In our experience of working with domain experts who are using today's AutoML systems, a common problem we encountered is what we call "unrealistic expectations" -- when users are facing a very challenging task with a noisy data acquisition process, while being expected to achieve startlingly high accuracy with machine learning (ML). Many of these are predestined to fail from the beginning. In traditional software engineering, this problem is addressed via a feasibility study, an indispensable step before developing any software system. In this paper, we present Snoopy, with the goal of supporting data scientists and machine learning engineers performing a systematic and theoretically founded feasibility study before building ML applications. We approach this problem by estimating the irreducible error of the underlying task, also known as the Bayes error rate (BER), which stems from data quality issues in datasets used to train or evaluate ML model artifacts. We design a practical Bayes error estimator that is compared against baseline feasibility study candidates on 6 datasets (with additional real and synthetic noise of different levels) in computer vision and natural language processing. Furthermore, by including our systematic feasibility study with additional signals into the iterative label cleaning process, we demonstrate in end-to-end experiments how users are able to save substantial labeling time and monetary efforts.

Related papers

• Towards Understanding the Impact of Data Bugs on Deep Learning Models in Software Engineering [13.17302533571231]
  Deep learning (DL) systems are prone to bugs from many sources, including training data. Existing literature suggests that bugs in training data are highly prevalent. We investigate three types of data prevalent in software engineering tasks: code-based, text-based, and metric-based.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T00:28:20Z)
• Outside the Comfort Zone: Analysing LLM Capabilities in Software Vulnerability Detection [9.652886240532741]
  This paper thoroughly analyses large language models' capabilities in detecting vulnerabilities within source code. We evaluate the performance of six open-source models that are specifically trained for vulnerability detection against six general-purpose LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T10:00:57Z)
• Automatic Dataset Construction (ADC): Sample Collection, Data Curation, and Beyond [38.89457061559469]
  We propose an innovative methodology that automates dataset creation with negligible cost and high efficiency. We provide open-source software that incorporates existing methods for label error detection, robust learning under noisy and biased data. We design three benchmark datasets focused on label noise detection, label noise learning, and class-imbalanced learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T04:45:12Z)
• Characterization of Large Language Model Development in the Datacenter [55.9909258342639]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have presented impressive performance across several transformative tasks. However, it is non-trivial to efficiently utilize large-scale cluster resources to develop LLMs. We present an in-depth characterization study of a six-month LLM development workload trace collected from our GPU datacenter Acme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T13:31:14Z)
• Zero-knowledge Proof Meets Machine Learning in Verifiability: A Survey [19.70499936572449]
  High-quality models rely not only on efficient optimization algorithms but also on the training and learning processes built upon vast amounts of data and computational power. Due to various challenges such as limited computational resources and data privacy concerns, users in need of models often cannot train machine learning models locally. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of zero-knowledge proof-based verifiable machine learning (ZKP-VML) technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T12:15:23Z)
• Benchmarking Automated Machine Learning Methods for Price Forecasting Applications [58.720142291102135]
  We show the possibility of substituting manually created ML pipelines with automated machine learning (AutoML) solutions. Based on the CRISP-DM process, we split the manual ML pipeline into a machine learning and non-machine learning part. We show in a case study for the industrial use case of price forecasting, that domain knowledge combined with AutoML can weaken the dependence on ML experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T10:27:38Z)
• Privacy Adhering Machine Un-learning in NLP [66.17039929803933]
  In real world industry use Machine Learning to build models on user data. Such mandates require effort both in terms of data as well as model retraining. continuous removal of data and model retraining steps do not scale. We propose textitMachine Unlearning to tackle this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T16:06:45Z)
• Representation Learning for the Automatic Indexing of Sound Effects Libraries [79.68916470119743]
  We show that a task-specific but dataset-independent representation can successfully address data issues such as class imbalance, inconsistent class labels, and insufficient dataset size. Detailed experimental results show the impact of metric learning approaches and different cross-dataset training methods on representational effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T23:46:13Z)
• Detecting Requirements Smells With Deep Learning: Experiences, Challenges and Future Work [9.44316959798363]
  This work aims to improve the previous work by creating a manually labeled dataset and using ensemble learning, Deep Learning (DL), and techniques such as word embeddings and transfer learning to overcome the generalization problem. The current findings show that the dataset is unbalanced and which class examples should be added more.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-06T12:45:15Z)
• Technology Readiness Levels for Machine Learning Systems [107.56979560568232]
  Development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. We have developed a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment. Our "Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels" framework defines a principled process to ensure robust, reliable, and responsible systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-11T15:54:48Z)
• Towards CRISP-ML(Q): A Machine Learning Process Model with Quality Assurance Methodology [53.063411515511056]
  We propose a process model for the development of machine learning applications. The first phase combines business and data understanding as data availability oftentimes affects the feasibility of the project. The sixth phase covers state-of-the-art approaches for monitoring and maintenance of a machine learning applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-11T08:25:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.