Inference of Causal Effects when Control Variables are Unknown
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.08154v2
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:59:07 GMT
- Title: Inference of Causal Effects when Control Variables are Unknown
- Abstract summary: We propose a method for inferring average causal effects when all potential confounders are observed.
When the data-generating process belongs to the class of acyclical structural causal models, we prove that the method yields valid confidence intervals.
- Score: 16.244541005112747
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Conventional methods in causal effect inferencetypically rely on specifying a
valid set of control variables. When this set is unknown or misspecified,
inferences will be erroneous. We propose a method for inferring average causal
effects when all potential confounders are observed, but thecontrol variables
are unknown. When the data-generating process belongs to the class of acyclical
linear structural causal models, we prove that themethod yields asymptotically
valid confidence intervals. Our results build upon a smooth characterization of
linear directed acyclic graphs. We verify the capability of the method to
produce valid confidence intervals for average causal effects using synthetic
data, even when the appropriate specification of control variables is unknown.
Related papers
- Data-Driven Covariate Selection for Nonparametric and Cycle-Agnostic Causal Effect Estimation [6.314911271798747]
Estimating causal effects from observational data requires identifying valid adjustment sets.<n>Existing approaches typically assume acyclicity or rely on global causal structure learning.<n>We show that our method applies across cyclic and acyclic settings without modification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T15:02:07Z) - Identification of Causal Direction under an Arbitrary Number of Latent Confounders [54.76982125821112]
In real-world scenarios, observed variables may be affected by multiple latent variables simultaneously.<n>We make use of the joint higher-order cumulant matrix of the observed variables constructed in a specific way.<n>We show that, surprisingly, causal asymmetry between two observed variables can be directly seen from the rank deficiency properties of such higher-order cumulant matrices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-26T15:10:00Z) - A Sample Efficient Conditional Independence Test in the Presence of Discretization [54.047334792855345]
Conditional Independence (CI) tests directly to discretized data can lead to incorrect conclusions.<n>Recent advancements have sought to infer the correct CI relationship between the latent variables through binarizing observed data.<n>Motivated by this, this paper introduces a sample-efficient CI test that does not rely on the binarization process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-10T12:41:26Z) - Practically Effective Adjustment Variable Selection in Causal Inference [0.0]
We propose criteria for selecting variables from a list of candidate adjustment variables along with an algorithm to prevent degradation accuracy in causal effect estimation.
We demonstrate the practical utility of our method using both existing and artificial data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-04T20:35:19Z) - Local Learning for Covariate Selection in Nonparametric Causal Effect Estimation with Latent Variables [13.12743473333296]
Estimating causal effects from nonexperimental data is a fundamental problem in many fields of science.
We propose a novel local learning approach for covariate selection in nonparametric causal effect estimation.
We validate our algorithm through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-25T12:08:54Z) - Front-door Adjustment Beyond Markov Equivalence with Limited Graph
Knowledge [36.210656212459554]
We provide testable conditional independence statements to compute the causal effect using front-door-like adjustment.
We show that our method is applicable in scenarios where knowing the Markov equivalence class is not sufficient for causal effect estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-19T15:16:56Z) - Identifiable causal inference with noisy treatment and no side information [6.432072145009342]
This study proposes a model that assumes a continuous treatment variable that is inaccurately measured.
We prove that our model's causal effect estimates are identifiable, even without side information and knowledge of the measurement error variance.
Our work extends the range of applications in which reliable causal inference can be conducted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-18T18:38:10Z) - Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown
Interventions [63.1354734978244]
We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables.
Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z) - Independence Testing-Based Approach to Causal Discovery under
Measurement Error and Linear Non-Gaussian Models [9.016435298155827]
Causal discovery aims to recover causal structures generating observational data.
We consider a specific formulation of the problem, where the unobserved target variables follow a linear non-Gaussian acyclic model.
We propose the Transformed Independent Noise condition, which checks for independence between a specific linear transformation of some measured variables and certain other measured variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-20T05:10:37Z) - Partial Identification with Noisy Covariates: A Robust Optimization
Approach [94.10051154390237]
Causal inference from observational datasets often relies on measuring and adjusting for covariates.
We show that this robust optimization approach can extend a wide range of causal adjustment methods to perform partial identification.
Across synthetic and real datasets, we find that this approach provides ATE bounds with a higher coverage probability than existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-22T04:24:26Z) - Tracking the risk of a deployed model and detecting harmful distribution
shifts [105.27463615756733]
In practice, it may make sense to ignore benign shifts, under which the performance of a deployed model does not degrade substantially.
We argue that a sensible method for firing off a warning has to both (a) detect harmful shifts while ignoring benign ones, and (b) allow continuous monitoring of model performance without increasing the false alarm rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-12T17:21:41Z) - Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and
Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects.
We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders.
We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z) - Disentangling Observed Causal Effects from Latent Confounders using
Method of Moments [67.27068846108047]
We provide guarantees on identifiability and learnability under mild assumptions.
We develop efficient algorithms based on coupled tensor decomposition with linear constraints to obtain scalable and guaranteed solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-17T07:48:45Z) - The Impact of Data on the Stability of Learning-Based Control- Extended
Version [63.97366815968177]
We propose a Lyapunov-based measure for quantifying the impact of data on the certifiable control performance.
By modeling unknown system dynamics through Gaussian processes, we can determine the interrelation between model uncertainty and satisfaction of stability conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-20T19:10:01Z) - A Class of Algorithms for General Instrumental Variable Models [29.558215059892206]
Causal treatment effect estimation is a key problem that arises in a variety of real-world settings.
We provide a method for causal effect bounding in continuous distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-11T12:32:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.