Mind the Gap: A Framework (BehaveFIT) Guiding The Use of Immersive Technologies in Behavior Change Processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.10912v1
• Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 12:48:01 GMT
• Title: Mind the Gap: A Framework (BehaveFIT) Guiding The Use of Immersive Technologies in Behavior Change Processes
• Authors: Carolin Wienrich, Nina Ines D\"ollinger and Rebecca Hein
• Abstract summary: The Behavioral Framework for immersive Technologies (BehaveFIT) presents an intelligible categorization and condensation of psychological barriers and immersive features. These three steps explain how BehaveFIT can be used, and include guiding questions and one example for each step.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The design and evaluation of assisting technologies to support behavior change processes have become an essential topic within the field of human-computer interaction research in general and the field of immersive intervention technologies in particular. The mechanisms and success of behavior change techniques and interventions are broadly investigated in the field of psychology. However, it is not always easy to adapt these psychological findings to the context of immersive technologies. The lack of theoretical foundation also leads to a lack of explanation as to why and how immersive interventions support behavior change processes. The Behavioral Framework for immersive Technologies (BehaveFIT) addresses this lack by (1) presenting an intelligible categorization and condensation of psychological barriers and immersive features, by (2) suggesting a mapping that shows why and how immersive technologies can help to overcome barriers, and finally by (3) proposing a generic prediction path that enables a structured, theory-based approach to the development and evaluation of immersive interventions. These three steps explain how BehaveFIT can be used, and include guiding questions and one example for each step. Thus, the present paper contributes to guidance for immersive intervention design and evaluation, showing that immersive interventions support behavior change processes and explain and predict 'why' and 'how' immersive interventions can bridge the intention-behavior-gap.

Related papers

• Mapping acceptance: micro scenarios as a dual-perspective approach for assessing public opinion and individual differences in technology perception [0.0]
  This article introduces micro scenarios as an integrative method to evaluate mental models and social acceptance across numerous technologies and concepts. Average evaluations of each participant can be seen as individual differences, providing reflexive measurements across technologies or topics. This paper aims to bridge the gap between technological advancement and societal perception, offering a tool for more informed decision-making in technology development and policy-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T16:43:32Z)
• Approaching Unanticipated Consequences [3.253495920474109]
  We explored how software that fulfils its requirements may have un-envisioned aftereffects with significant impacts. We considered three real-world case studies and engaged with literature from several disciplines to develop a conceptual framework. We found participant groups navigated the model with either a convergent or divergent intent. The study demonstrated potential for the conceptual framework to be used as a tool with implications for research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T16:43:52Z)
• Expanding the Role of Affective Phenomena in Multimodal Interaction Research [57.069159905961214]
  We examined over 16,000 papers from selected conferences in multimodal interaction, affective computing, and natural language processing. We identify 910 affect-related papers and present our analysis of the role of affective phenomena in these papers. We find limited research on how affect and emotion predictions might be used by AI systems to enhance machine understanding of human social behaviors and cognitive states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T09:08:39Z)
• Evaluating Temporal Observation-Based Causal Discovery Techniques Applied to Road Driver Behaviour [6.980076213134384]
  We evaluate 10 contemporary observational temporal causal discovery methods in the domain of autonomous driving. By evaluating these methods upon causal scenes drawn from real world datasets in addition to those generated synthetically we highlight where improvements need to be made. We discuss potential directions for future work that could help better tackle the difficulties currently experienced by state of the art techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T19:55:24Z)
• Social Influence Dialogue Systems: A Scoping Survey of the Efforts Towards Influence Capabilities of Dialogue Systems [50.57882213439553]
  Social influence dialogue systems are capable of persuasion, negotiation, and therapy. There exists no formal definition or category for dialogue systems with these skills. This study serves as a comprehensive reference for social influence dialogue systems to inspire more dedicated research and discussion in this emerging area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T17:57:23Z)
• Personalized Interventions for Online Moderation [0.9346127431927982]
  Current online moderation follows a one-size-fits-all approach. We propose a paradigm-shift in online moderation by moving towards a personalized and user-centered approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T10:44:57Z)
• Active Inference in Robotics and Artificial Agents: Survey and Challenges [51.29077770446286]
  We review the state-of-the-art theory and implementations of active inference for state-estimation, control, planning and learning. We showcase relevant experiments that illustrate its potential in terms of adaptation, generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T12:10:26Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• Individual Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Poverty Estimation [63.18666008322476]
  Machine learning methods are being increasingly applied in sensitive societal contexts. The present case study has two main objectives. First, to expose these challenges and how they affect the use of relevant and novel explanations methods. And second, to present a set of strategies that mitigate such challenges, as faced when implementing explanation methods in a relevant application domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T01:54:58Z)
• Behavior Priors for Efficient Reinforcement Learning [97.81587970962232]
  We consider how information and architectural constraints can be combined with ideas from the probabilistic modeling literature to learn behavior priors. We discuss how such latent variable formulations connect to related work on hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) and mutual information and curiosity based objectives. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework by applying it to a range of simulated continuous control domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T13:17:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.