Why the Future Cannot be Open in the Quantum World

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.01894v3
• Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:52:42 GMT
• Title: Why the Future Cannot be Open in the Quantum World
• Authors: Kunihisa Morita
• Abstract summary: An open future means that the value observed when measuring a physical quantity in the future is not determined. Many interpretations regard quantum mechanics as deterministic. I argue that, although quantum mechanics cannot predict the future with certainty, the quantum mechanical world must be deterministic.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this study, I argue that the future is not open if quantum mechanics is complete. An open future means that the value observed when measuring a physical quantity in the future is not determined. At first glance, quantum mechanics seems to support the open future thesis, because it cannot always predict measurement value with certainty. However, many interpretations regard quantum mechanics as deterministic. These interpretations only suggest that the quantum mechanical world can be deterministic. I argue that, although quantum mechanics cannot predict the future with certainty, the quantum mechanical world must be deterministic, and the value observed by the observer is determined. I examine the following two cases: (1) the wave-function completely describes the physical state and (2) the wave-function does not describe the physical state. Then, I argue that the future cannot be open in either case when quantum mechanics is complete.

Related papers

• Against (unitary) interpretation (of quantum mechanics): removing the metaphysical load [0.0]
  We show that "unitary quantum mechanics", which according to its followers leads to some interesting paradoxes, is an interpretation of quantum mechanics. The root of "unitary" vs. operational discrepancy is that the latter treats the measurement process as irreversible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T16:19:44Z)
• Observability and Predictability in Quantum and Post-Quantum Physics [0.0]
  I show that many quantum 'paradoxes' rest on ambiguous reasoning about the two domains. I formally define and address the question of whether quantum uncertainty could be fundamental. I argue that a partial proof for the impossibility of predictive advantage can be established for bi-partite quantum systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-11T17:05:01Z)
• Understanding and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics [0.65268245109828]
  De Regt's contextual theory of understanding argues that recognizing qualitatively characteristic consequences of a theory T without performing exact calculations is a criterion for scientific understanding. If the task of understanding quantum mechanics has been finished already, there would be a conflict between the contextual theory of understanding of quantum mechanics and interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T10:59:30Z)
• Quantizing the Quantum Uncertainty [0.0]
  We discuss the quantization of the quantum uncertainty as an operator acting on wave-functions over field space. We show how this spectrum appears in the value of the coupling of the effective conformal potential driving the evolution of extended Gaussian wave-packets. We conclude with an open question: is it possible to see experimental signatures of the quantization of the quantum uncertainty in non-relativistic physics?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T14:40:14Z)
• Two Quantum Entangled Cheshire Cats [14.618082583488812]
  In the original thought experiment of the Quantum Cheshire Cat, the physical properties of the cat (state) can be decoupled from its quantum entities. Here, we conceive a new thought experiment that exploits quantum entanglement with weak (value) measurement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T01:02:29Z)
• Schr\"odinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator [54.35850218188371]
  The superposition principle is one of the most fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. Here we demonstrate the preparation of a mechanical resonator with an effective mass of 16.2 micrograms in Schr"odinger cat states of motion. We show control over the size and phase of the superposition and investigate the decoherence dynamics of these states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T13:29:44Z)
• Quantum Instability [30.674987397533997]
  We show how a time-independent, finite-dimensional quantum system can give rise to a linear instability corresponding to that in the classical system. An unstable quantum system has a richer spectrum and a much longer recurrence time than a stable quantum system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-05T19:53:46Z)
• Gentle Measurement as a Principle of Quantum Theory [9.137554315375919]
  We propose the gentle measurement principle (GMP) as one of the principles at the foundation of quantum mechanics. We show, within the framework of general probabilistic theories, that GMP imposes strong restrictions on the law of physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-28T11:59:49Z)
• Is the standard quantum mechanics a completely nondeterministic theory? [0.0]
  It is argued that although quantum theory isn't an absolutely deterministic theory, it is partially deterministic. The argument is based on the conceptual meaning of determinism and by means of some well-known phenomena in the quantum world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-04T14:48:13Z)
• The Uncertainty Principle of Quantum Processes [6.2997667081978825]
  We show that the uncertainty principle can be reformulated to include process-measurements that are performed on quantum channels. We obtain expressions that generalize the Maassen-Uffink uncertainty relation and the universal uncertainty relations from quantum states to quantum channels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-11T06:03:30Z)
• Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
  We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations. We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.