Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational
Mobility
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08451v1
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 05:35:55 GMT
- Title: Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational
Mobility
- Authors: Hoda Heidari and Jon Kleinberg
- Abstract summary: We develop a model for allocating opportunities in a society that exhibits bottlenecks in mobility.
We show how optimal allocations in our model arise as solutions to continuous optimization problems over multiple generations.
We characterize how the structure of the model can lead to either temporary or persistent affirmative action.
- Score: 7.516726228481857
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Opportunities such as higher education can promote intergenerational
mobility, leading individuals to achieve levels of socioeconomic status above
that of their parents. We develop a dynamic model for allocating such
opportunities in a society that exhibits bottlenecks in mobility; the problem
of optimal allocation reflects a trade-off between the benefits conferred by
the opportunities in the current generation and the potential to elevate the
socioeconomic status of recipients, shaping the composition of future
generations in ways that can benefit further from the opportunities. We show
how optimal allocations in our model arise as solutions to continuous
optimization problems over multiple generations, and we find in general that
these optimal solutions can favor recipients of low socioeconomic status over
slightly higher-performing individuals of high socioeconomic status -- a form
of socioeconomic affirmative action that the society in our model discovers in
the pursuit of purely payoff-maximizing goals. We characterize how the
structure of the model can lead to either temporary or persistent affirmative
action, and we consider extensions of the model with more complex processes
modulating the movement between different levels of socioeconomic status.
Related papers
- SocioVerse: A World Model for Social Simulation Powered by LLM Agents and A Pool of 10 Million Real-World Users [70.02370111025617]
We introduce SocioVerse, an agent-driven world model for social simulation.
Our framework features four powerful alignment components and a user pool of 10 million real individuals.
Results demonstrate that SocioVerse can reflect large-scale population dynamics while ensuring diversity, credibility, and representativeness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-14T12:12:52Z) - A Theoretical Model for Grit in Pursuing Ambitious Ends [48.43624563381919]
We provide a model of decision-making between stable and risky choices in the improving multi-armed bandits framework.
We study the impact of various interventions, such as increasing grit or providing a financial safety net.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T19:17:42Z) - TwinMarket: A Scalable Behavioral and Social Simulation for Financial Markets [24.354300029071418]
Large language model (LLM) agents have gained traction as simulation tools for modeling human behavior.
We introduce TwinMarket, a novel multi-agent framework that leverages LLMs to simulate socio-economic systems.
Our approach provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between individual decision-making and collective socio-economic patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-03T16:39:48Z) - Latent-Predictive Empowerment: Measuring Empowerment without a Simulator [56.53777237504011]
We present Latent-Predictive Empowerment (LPE), an algorithm that can compute empowerment in a more practical manner.
LPE learns large skillsets by maximizing an objective that is a principled replacement for the mutual information between skills and states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T00:41:18Z) - On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision Making [52.128546842746246]
Large pretrained models are showing increasingly better performance in reasoning and planning tasks.
We evaluate their ability to produce decision-making policies, either directly, by generating actions, or indirectly.
In environments with unfamiliar dynamics, we explore how fine-tuning LLMs with synthetic data can significantly improve their reward modeling capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T03:12:57Z) - Explanation, Debate, Align: A Weak-to-Strong Framework for Language Model Generalization [0.6629765271909505]
This paper introduces a novel approach to model alignment through weak-to-strong generalization in the context of language models.
Our results suggest that this facilitation-based approach not only enhances model performance but also provides insights into the nature of model alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-11T15:16:25Z) - Evolutionary mechanisms that promote cooperation may not promote social welfare [1.7819574476785418]
We show that the objectives of maximising cooperation levels and the objectives of maximising social welfare are often misaligned.
We argue for the need of adopting social welfare as the main optimisation objective when designing and implementing evolutionary mechanisms for social and collective goods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-09T22:51:13Z) - PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development.
We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z) - Training Socially Aligned Language Models on Simulated Social
Interactions [99.39979111807388]
Social alignment in AI systems aims to ensure that these models behave according to established societal values.
Current language models (LMs) are trained to rigidly replicate their training corpus in isolation.
This work presents a novel training paradigm that permits LMs to learn from simulated social interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T14:17:36Z) - ChatGPT is all you need to decolonize sub-Saharan Vocational Education [0.6999740786886537]
This position paper makes the case for an educational policy framework that would succeed in this transformation.
We highlight substantial applications of Large Language Models, tailor-made to their respective cultural background.
We provide specific historical examples of diverse states successfully implementing such policies in the elementary steps of their socioeconomic transformation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-11T23:50:37Z) - Finding Regularized Competitive Equilibria of Heterogeneous Agent
Macroeconomic Models with Reinforcement Learning [151.03738099494765]
We study a heterogeneous agent macroeconomic model with an infinite number of households and firms competing in a labor market.
We propose a data-driven reinforcement learning framework that finds the regularized competitive equilibrium of the model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-24T17:16:27Z) - Achievement and Fragility of Long-term Equitability [3.04585143845864]
We investigate how to allocate limited resources to locally interacting communities in a way to maximize a notion of equitability.
We employ recent mathematical tools stemming from data-driven feedback online optimization.
We design dynamic policies that converge to an allocation that maximize equitability in the long term.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-24T15:04:49Z) - An active inference model of collective intelligence [0.0]
This paper posits a minimal agent-based model that simulates the relationship between local individual-level interaction and collective intelligence.
Results show that stepwise cognitive transitions increase system performance by providing complementary mechanisms for alignment between agents' local and global optima.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-02T14:32:01Z) - On the model-based stochastic value gradient for continuous
reinforcement learning [50.085645237597056]
We show that simple model-based agents can outperform state-of-the-art model-free agents in terms of both sample-efficiency and final reward.
Our findings suggest that model-based policy evaluation deserves closer attention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-28T17:58:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.