Related papers: The Gospel According to Q: Understanding the QAnon Conspiracy from the Perspective of Canonical Information

The Gospel According to Q: Understanding the QAnon Conspiracy from the Perspective of Canonical Information

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08750v3
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:32:00 GMT
Title: The Gospel According to Q: Understanding the QAnon Conspiracy from the Perspective of Canonical Information
Authors: Antonis Papasavva, Max Aliapoulios, Cameron Ballard, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gianluca Stringhini, Savvas Zannettou, and Jeremy Blackburn
Abstract summary: We study the QAnon conspiracy theory from the perspective of "Q" themself. We build a dataset of 4,949 canonical Q drops collected from six "aggregation sites" We analyze the Q drops' contents to identify topics of discussion and find statistically significant indications that drops were not authored by a single individual.
Score: 10.788583114755838
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: The QAnon conspiracy theory claims that a cabal of (literally) blood-thirsty politicians and media personalities are engaged in a war to destroy society. By interpreting cryptic "drops" of information from an anonymous insider calling themself Q, adherents of the conspiracy theory believe that Donald Trump is leading them in an active fight against this cabal. QAnon has been covered extensively by the media, as its adherents have been involved in multiple violent acts, including the January 6th, 2021 seditious storming of the US Capitol building. Nevertheless, we still have relatively little understanding of how the theory evolved and spread on the Web, and the role played in that by multiple platforms. To address this gap, we study QAnon from the perspective of "Q" themself. We build a dataset of 4,949 canonical Q drops collected from six "aggregation sites," which curate and archive them from their original posting to anonymous and ephemeral image boards. We expose that these sites have a relatively low (overall) agreement, and thus at least some Q drops should probably be considered apocryphal. We then analyze the Q drops' contents to identify topics of discussion and find statistically significant indications that drops were not authored by a single individual. Finally, we look at how posts on Reddit are used to disseminate Q drops to wider audiences. We find that dissemination was (initially) limited to a few sub-communities and that, while heavy-handed moderation decisions have reduced the overall issue, the "gospel" of Q persists on the Web.

Related papers

The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model [50.80312055220701]
We discover that conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels. We find conspiracy theorists leverage e-commerce platforms to sell questionable products or lucratively promote them through affiliate links. We conclude that this business involves hundreds of thousands of donors and generates a turnover of almost $66 million.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T16:25:52Z)
A Golden Age: Conspiracy Theories' Relationship with Misinformation Outlets, News Media, and the Wider Internet [6.917588580148212]
We identify and publish a set of 755 different conspiracy theory websites dedicated to five conspiracy theories. We find that each set often hyperlinks to the same external domains, with COVID and QAnon conspiracy theory websites having the largest amount of shared connections. Examining the role of news media, we find that not only do outlets known for spreading misinformation hyperlink to our set of conspiracy theory websites more often than authentic news websites.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-26T00:20:02Z)
Where the Earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results [62.997667081978825]
We examine the distribution of conspiratorial information in search results across five search engines: Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Yandex. We find that all search engines except Google consistently displayed conspiracy-promoting results and returned links to conspiracy-dedicated websites in their top results. Most conspiracy-promoting results came from social media and conspiracy-dedicated websites while conspiracy-debunking information was shared by scientific websites and, to a lesser extent, legacy media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-02T14:29:21Z)
Comparing the Language of QAnon-related content on Parler, Gab, and Twitter [68.8204255655161]
Parler, a "free speech" platform popular with conservatives, was taken offline in January 2021 due to the lack of moderation of hateful and QAnon- and other conspiracy-related content. We compare posts with the hashtag #QAnon on Parler over a month-long period with posts on Twitter and Gab. Gab has the highest proportion of #QAnon posts with hate terms, and Parler and Twitter are similar in this respect. On all three platforms, posts mentioning female political figures, Democrats, or Donald Trump have more anti-social language than posts mentioning male politicians, Republicans, or
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-22T11:19:15Z)
A network-based approach to QAnon user dynamics and topic diversity during the COVID-19 infodemic [1.776746672434207]
QAnon is an umbrella conspiracy theory that encompasses a wide spectrum of people. The COVID-19 pandemic has helped raise the QAnon conspiracy theory to a wide-spreading movement. We study users' dynamics on Twitter related to the QAnon movement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-31T16:34:43Z)
Attacking Open-domain Question Answering by Injecting Misinformation [116.25434773461465]
We study the risk of misinformation to Question Answering (QA) models by investigating the sensitivity of open-domain QA models to misinformation documents. Experiments show that QA models are vulnerable to even small amounts of evidence contamination brought by misinformation. We discuss the necessity of building a misinformation-aware QA system that integrates question-answering and misinformation detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-15T01:55:18Z)
Characterizing Social Imaginaries and Self-Disclosures of Dissonance in Online Conspiracy Discussion Communities [8.680081568962997]
This paper characterizes self-disclosures of dissonance about QAnon, a conspiracy theory initiated by a mysterious leader Q. We focus on 2K posts from two image boards, 4chan and 8chan, and 1.2 M comments and posts from 12 subreddits dedicated to QAnon. We find that self-disclosures of dissonance correlate with a significant decrease in user contributions and ultimately with their departure from the community.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-21T16:49:21Z)
No Calm in The Storm: Investigating QAnon Website Relationships [5.567674129101803]
QAnon is a far-right conspiracy theory whose followers largely organize online. We use web crawls seeded from two of the largest QAnon hotbeds on the Internet, Voat and 8kun, to build a QAnon-centered domain-based hyperlink graph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-29T20:39:17Z)
News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
"Is it a Qoincidence?": An Exploratory Study of QAnon on Voat [12.14455026524814]
The QAnon conspiracy theory emerged in 2017 on 4chan. We study the most popular named entities mentioned in the posts, along with the most prominent topics of discussion. Our graph visualization shows that some of the QAnon-related ones are closely related to those from the Pizzagate conspiracy theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-10T14:25:28Z)
Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.