A network-based approach to QAnon user dynamics and topic diversity
during the COVID-19 infodemic
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.00537v5
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 15:39:05 GMT
- Title: A network-based approach to QAnon user dynamics and topic diversity
during the COVID-19 infodemic
- Authors: Wentao Xu, Kazutoshi Sasahara
- Abstract summary: QAnon is an umbrella conspiracy theory that encompasses a wide spectrum of people.
The COVID-19 pandemic has helped raise the QAnon conspiracy theory to a wide-spreading movement.
We study users' dynamics on Twitter related to the QAnon movement.
- Score: 1.776746672434207
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: QAnon is an umbrella conspiracy theory that encompasses a wide spectrum of
people. The COVID-19 pandemic has helped raise the QAnon conspiracy theory to a
wide-spreading movement, especially in the US. Here, we study users' dynamics
on Twitter related to the QAnon movement (i.e., pro-/anti-QAnon and
less-leaning users) in the context of the COVID-19 infodemic and the topics
involved using a simple network-based approach. We found that pro- and
anti-leaning users show different population dynamics and that late
less-leaning users were mostly anti-QAnon. These trends might have been
affected by Twitter's suspension strategies. We also found that QAnon clusters
include many bot users. Furthermore, our results suggest that QAnon continues
to evolve amid the infodemic and does not limit itself to its original idea but
instead extends its reach to create a much larger umbrella conspiracy theory.
The network-based approach in this study is important for nowcasting the
evolution of the QAnon movement.
Related papers
- Quantization Aware Attack: Enhancing Transferable Adversarial Attacks by Model Quantization [57.87950229651958]
Quantized neural networks (QNNs) have received increasing attention in resource-constrained scenarios due to their exceptional generalizability.
Previous studies claim that transferability is difficult to achieve across QNNs with different bitwidths.
We propose textitquantization aware attack (QAA) which fine-tunes a QNN substitute model with a multiple-bitwidth training objective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-10T03:46:53Z) - Identification of Twitter Bots based on an Explainable ML Framework: the
US 2020 Elections Case Study [72.61531092316092]
This paper focuses on the design of a novel system for identifying Twitter bots based on labeled Twitter data.
Supervised machine learning (ML) framework is adopted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm.
Our study also deploys Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for explaining the ML model predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-08T14:12:24Z) - Fixed Points in Cyber Space: Rethinking Optimal Evasion Attacks in the
Age of AI-NIDS [70.60975663021952]
We study blackbox adversarial attacks on network classifiers.
We argue that attacker-defender fixed points are themselves general-sum games with complex phase transitions.
We show that a continual learning approach is required to study attacker-defender dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-23T23:42:16Z) - Comparing the Language of QAnon-related content on Parler, Gab, and
Twitter [68.8204255655161]
Parler, a "free speech" platform popular with conservatives, was taken offline in January 2021 due to the lack of moderation of hateful and QAnon- and other conspiracy-related content.
We compare posts with the hashtag #QAnon on Parler over a month-long period with posts on Twitter and Gab.
Gab has the highest proportion of #QAnon posts with hate terms, and Parler and Twitter are similar in this respect.
On all three platforms, posts mentioning female political figures, Democrats, or Donald Trump have more anti-social language than posts mentioning male politicians, Republicans, or
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-22T11:19:15Z) - Are socially-aware trajectory prediction models really socially-aware? [75.36961426916639]
We introduce a socially-attended attack to assess the social understanding of prediction models.
An attack is a small yet carefully-crafted perturbations to fail predictors.
We show that our attack can be employed to increase the social understanding of state-of-the-art models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-24T17:59:09Z) - No Calm in The Storm: Investigating QAnon Website Relationships [5.567674129101803]
QAnon is a far-right conspiracy theory whose followers largely organize online.
We use web crawls seeded from two of the largest QAnon hotbeds on the Internet, Voat and 8kun, to build a QAnon-centered domain-based hyperlink graph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-29T20:39:17Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - On the Globalization of the QAnon Conspiracy Theory Through Telegram [2.006800684526131]
QAnon is a far-right conspiracy theory that became popular and mainstream over the past few years.
This paper performs a large-scale data analysis of QAnon through Telegram by collecting 4.5M messages posted in 161 QAnon groups/channels.
We find that the German language is prevalent in QAnon groups/channels on Telegram, even overshadowing English after 2020.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-27T09:24:25Z) - Rise of QAnon: A Mental Model of Good and Evil Stews in an Echochamber [0.0]
The QAnon conspiracy posits that Satan-worshiping Democrats operate a covert child sex-trafficking operation.
We report two computational studies examining the social network structure and semantic content of tweets produced by users central to the early QAnon network on Twitter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T19:34:35Z) - The Gospel According to Q: Understanding the QAnon Conspiracy from the
Perspective of Canonical Information [10.788583114755838]
We study the QAnon conspiracy theory from the perspective of "Q" themself.
We build a dataset of 4,949 canonical Q drops collected from six "aggregation sites"
We analyze the Q drops' contents to identify topics of discussion and find statistically significant indications that drops were not authored by a single individual.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-21T18:03:24Z) - "Is it a Qoincidence?": An Exploratory Study of QAnon on Voat [12.14455026524814]
The QAnon conspiracy theory emerged in 2017 on 4chan.
We study the most popular named entities mentioned in the posts, along with the most prominent topics of discussion.
Our graph visualization shows that some of the QAnon-related ones are closely related to those from the Pizzagate conspiracy theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-10T14:25:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.