No Calm in The Storm: Investigating QAnon Website Relationships

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.15715v5
• Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:09:44 GMT
• Title: No Calm in The Storm: Investigating QAnon Website Relationships
• Authors: Hans W. A. Hanley, Deepak Kumar, Zakir Durumeric
• Abstract summary: QAnon is a far-right conspiracy theory whose followers largely organize online. We use web crawls seeded from two of the largest QAnon hotbeds on the Internet, Voat and 8kun, to build a QAnon-centered domain-based hyperlink graph.
• Score: 5.567674129101803
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: QAnon is a far-right conspiracy theory whose followers largely organize online. In this work, we use web crawls seeded from two of the largest QAnon hotbeds on the Internet, Voat and 8kun, to build a QAnon-centered domain-based hyperlink graph. We use this graph to identify, understand, and learn about the set of websites that spread QAnon content online. Specifically, we curate the largest list of QAnon centered websites to date, from which we document the types of QAnon sites, their hosting providers, as well as their popularity. We further analyze QAnon websites' connection to mainstream news and misinformation online, highlighting the outsized role misinformation websites play in spreading the conspiracy. Finally, we leverage the observed relationship between QAnon and misinformation sites to build a highly accurate random forest classifier that distinguishes between misinformation and authentic news sites. Our results demonstrate new and effective ways to study the growing presence of conspiracy theories and misinformation on the Internet.

Related papers

• Where the Earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results [62.997667081978825]
  We examine the distribution of conspiratorial information in search results across five search engines: Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Yandex. We find that all search engines except Google consistently displayed conspiracy-promoting results and returned links to conspiracy-dedicated websites in their top results. Most conspiracy-promoting results came from social media and conspiracy-dedicated websites while conspiracy-debunking information was shared by scientific websites and, to a lesser extent, legacy media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T14:29:21Z)
• Comparing the Language of QAnon-related content on Parler, Gab, and Twitter [68.8204255655161]
  Parler, a "free speech" platform popular with conservatives, was taken offline in January 2021 due to the lack of moderation of hateful and QAnon- and other conspiracy-related content. We compare posts with the hashtag #QAnon on Parler over a month-long period with posts on Twitter and Gab. Gab has the highest proportion of #QAnon posts with hate terms, and Parler and Twitter are similar in this respect. On all three platforms, posts mentioning female political figures, Democrats, or Donald Trump have more anti-social language than posts mentioning male politicians, Republicans, or
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T11:19:15Z)
• A network-based approach to QAnon user dynamics and topic diversity during the COVID-19 infodemic [1.776746672434207]
  QAnon is an umbrella conspiracy theory that encompasses a wide spectrum of people. The COVID-19 pandemic has helped raise the QAnon conspiracy theory to a wide-spreading movement. We study users' dynamics on Twitter related to the QAnon movement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-31T16:34:43Z)
• Attacking Open-domain Question Answering by Injecting Misinformation [116.25434773461465]
  We study the risk of misinformation to Question Answering (QA) models by investigating the sensitivity of open-domain QA models to misinformation documents. Experiments show that QA models are vulnerable to even small amounts of evidence contamination brought by misinformation. We discuss the necessity of building a misinformation-aware QA system that integrates question-answering and misinformation detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T01:55:18Z)
• On the Globalization of the QAnon Conspiracy Theory Through Telegram [2.006800684526131]
  QAnon is a far-right conspiracy theory that became popular and mainstream over the past few years. This paper performs a large-scale data analysis of QAnon through Telegram by collecting 4.5M messages posted in 161 QAnon groups/channels. We find that the German language is prevalent in QAnon groups/channels on Telegram, even overshadowing English after 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T09:24:25Z)
• Rise of QAnon: A Mental Model of Good and Evil Stews in an Echochamber [0.0]
  The QAnon conspiracy posits that Satan-worshiping Democrats operate a covert child sex-trafficking operation. We report two computational studies examining the social network structure and semantic content of tweets produced by users central to the early QAnon network on Twitter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T19:34:35Z)
• User Preference-aware Fake News Detection [61.86175081368782]
  Existing fake news detection algorithms focus on mining news content for deceptive signals. We propose a new framework, UPFD, which simultaneously captures various signals from user preferences by joint content and graph modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-25T21:19:24Z)
• The Rise and Fall of Fake News sites: A Traffic Analysis [62.51737815926007]
  We investigate the online presence of fake news websites and characterize their behavior in comparison to real news websites. Based on our findings, we build a content-agnostic ML for automatic detection of fake news websites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T18:10:22Z)
• The Gospel According to Q: Understanding the QAnon Conspiracy from the Perspective of Canonical Information [10.788583114755838]
  We study the QAnon conspiracy theory from the perspective of "Q" themself. We build a dataset of 4,949 canonical Q drops collected from six "aggregation sites" We analyze the Q drops' contents to identify topics of discussion and find statistically significant indications that drops were not authored by a single individual.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-21T18:03:24Z)
• "Is it a Qoincidence?": An Exploratory Study of QAnon on Voat [12.14455026524814]
  The QAnon conspiracy theory emerged in 2017 on 4chan. We study the most popular named entities mentioned in the posts, along with the most prominent topics of discussion. Our graph visualization shows that some of the QAnon-related ones are closely related to those from the Pizzagate conspiracy theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T14:25:28Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.