Online Adversarial Purification based on Self-Supervision

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09387v1
• Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 00:19:52 GMT
• Title: Online Adversarial Purification based on Self-Supervision
• Authors: Changhao Shi, Chester Holtz and Gal Mishne
• Abstract summary: We present Self-supervised Online Adrial Purification (SOAP), a novel defense strategy that uses a self-supervised loss to purify adversarial examples at test-time. SOAP yields competitive robust accuracy against state-of-the-art adversarial training and purification methods. To the best of our knowledge, our paper is the first that generalizes the idea of using self-supervised signals to perform online test-time purification.
• Score: 6.821598757786515
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples, where a perturbation in the input space leads to an amplified shift in the latent network representation. In this paper, we combine canonical supervised learning with self-supervised representation learning, and present Self-supervised Online Adversarial Purification (SOAP), a novel defense strategy that uses a self-supervised loss to purify adversarial examples at test-time. Our approach leverages the label-independent nature of self-supervised signals and counters the adversarial perturbation with respect to the self-supervised tasks. SOAP yields competitive robust accuracy against state-of-the-art adversarial training and purification methods, with considerably less training complexity. In addition, our approach is robust even when adversaries are given knowledge of the purification defense strategy. To the best of our knowledge, our paper is the first that generalizes the idea of using self-supervised signals to perform online test-time purification.

Related papers

• Towards Improving Robustness Against Common Corruptions in Object Detectors Using Adversarial Contrastive Learning [10.27974860479791]
  This paper proposes an innovative adversarial contrastive learning framework to enhance neural network robustness simultaneously against adversarial attacks and common corruptions. By focusing on improving performance under adversarial and real-world conditions, our approach aims to bolster the robustness of neural networks in safety-critical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T06:13:52Z)
• Language Guided Adversarial Purification [3.9931474959554496]
  Adversarial purification using generative models demonstrates strong adversarial defense performance. New framework, Language Guided Adversarial Purification (LGAP), utilizing pre-trained diffusion models and caption generators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T06:17:18Z)
• Poisoning Network Flow Classifiers [10.055241826257083]
  This paper focuses on poisoning attacks, specifically backdoor attacks, against network traffic flow classifiers. We investigate the challenging scenario of clean-label poisoning where the adversary's capabilities are constrained to tampering only with the training data. We describe a trigger crafting strategy that leverages model interpretability techniques to generate trigger patterns that are effective even at very low poisoning rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T16:24:15Z)
• Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Machine Learning-Powered Networks: A Contemporary Survey [114.17568992164303]
  Adrial attacks and defenses in machine learning and deep neural network have been gaining significant attention. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in the field of adversarial attack and defense techniques. New avenues of attack are also explored, including search-based, decision-based, drop-based, and physical-world attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-11T04:19:31Z)
• Open-set Adversarial Defense with Clean-Adversarial Mutual Learning [93.25058425356694]
  This paper demonstrates that open-set recognition systems are vulnerable to adversarial samples. Motivated by these observations, we emphasize the necessity of an Open-Set Adversarial Defense (OSAD) mechanism. This paper proposes an Open-Set Defense Network with Clean-Adversarial Mutual Learning (OSDN-CAML) as a solution to the OSAD problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-12T02:13:55Z)
• SAGE: Intrusion Alert-driven Attack Graph Extractor [4.530678016396476]
  Attack graphs (AGs) are used to assess pathways availed by cyber adversaries to penetrate a network. We propose to automatically learn AGs based on actions observed through intrusion alerts, without prior expert knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-06T17:45:02Z)
• Policy Smoothing for Provably Robust Reinforcement Learning [109.90239627115336]
  We study the provable robustness of reinforcement learning against norm-bounded adversarial perturbations of the inputs. We generate certificates that guarantee that the total reward obtained by the smoothed policy will not fall below a certain threshold under a norm-bounded adversarial of perturbation the input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T21:42:08Z)
• Combating Adversaries with Anti-Adversaries [118.70141983415445]
  In particular, our layer generates an input perturbation in the opposite direction of the adversarial one. We verify the effectiveness of our approach by combining our layer with both nominally and robustly trained models. Our anti-adversary layer significantly enhances model robustness while coming at no cost on clean accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T09:36:59Z)
• Adversarial defense for automatic speaker verification by cascaded self-supervised learning models [101.42920161993455]
  More and more malicious attackers attempt to launch adversarial attacks at automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems. We propose a standard and attack-agnostic method based on cascaded self-supervised learning models to purify the adversarial perturbations. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves effective defense performance and can successfully counter adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-14T01:56:43Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.