Moral and Social Ramifications of Autonomous Vehicles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11775v2
• Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:15:15 GMT
• Title: Moral and Social Ramifications of Autonomous Vehicles
• Authors: Veljko Dubljevi\'c (1), Sean Douglas (1), Jovan Milojevich (2), Nirav Ajmeri (3), William A. Bauer (1), George F. List (1) and Munindar P. Singh (1) ((1) North Carolina State University, (2) Oklahoma State University, (3) University of Bristol)
• Abstract summary: We focus on the specific concerns arising from how AV technology will affect the lives and livelihoods of professional and semi-professional drivers. By showing how drivers differ from the experts, our study has ramifications beyond AVs to AI and other advanced technologies.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) raise important social and ethical concerns, especially about accountability, dignity, and justice. We focus on the specific concerns arising from how AV technology will affect the lives and livelihoods of professional and semi-professional drivers. Whereas previous studies of such concerns have focused on the opinions of experts, we seek to understand these ethical and societal challenges from the perspectives of the drivers themselves. To this end, we adopted a qualitative research methodology based on semi-structured interviews. This is an established social science methodology that helps understand the core concerns of stakeholders in depth by avoiding the biases of superficial methods such as surveys. We find that whereas drivers agree with the experts that AVs will significantly impact transportation systems, they are apprehensive about the prospects for their livelihoods and dismiss the suggestions that driving jobs are unsatisfying and their profession does not merit protection. By showing how drivers differ from the experts, our study has ramifications beyond AVs to AI and other advanced technologies. Our findings suggest that qualitative research applied to the relevant, especially disempowered, stakeholders is essential to ensuring that new technologies are introduced ethically.

Related papers

• Heterogeneous Decision Making in Mixed Traffic: Uncertainty-aware Planning and Bounded Rationality [31.66608520780982]
  We study heterogeneous decision making by automated vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HVs) in a mixed traffic environment. Our findings reveal some intriguing phenomena, such as Goodhart's Law in AV's learning performance and compounding effects in HV's decision making process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T00:32:33Z)
• Towards Developing Socially Compliant Automated Vehicles: Advances, Expert Insights, and A Conceptual Framework [8.077621888442337]
  Automated Vehicles (AVs) hold promise for revolutionizing transportation by improving road safety, traffic efficiency, and overall mobility. Transition to full automation entails a period of mixed traffic, where AVs of varying automation levels coexist with human-driven vehicles (HDVs) Ensuring AVs' compatibility with HDVs and social acceptance is crucial for their successful and seamless integration into mixed traffic. This study carries out the first comprehensive scoping review to assess the current state of the art in developing SCAVs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T16:39:01Z)
• Managing Human Factors in Automated Vehicle Development: Towards Challenges and Practices [4.419836325434071]
  It is important to consider human factors (HF) knowledge when developing automated vehicles (AVs) to make them safe and accepted. This study explores the current practices and challenges of the automotive industries for incorporating HF requirements during agile AV development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T07:48:43Z)
• Work-in-Progress: Crash Course: Can (Under Attack) Autonomous Driving Beat Human Drivers? [60.51287814584477]
  This paper evaluates the inherent risks in autonomous driving by examining the current landscape of AVs. We develop specific claims highlighting the delicate balance between the advantages of AVs and potential security challenges in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T09:42:21Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Why Autonomous Vehicles Are Not Ready Yet: A Multi-Disciplinary Review of Problems, Attempted Solutions, and Future Directions [43.389650174195914]
  The present review adopts an integrative and multidisciplinary approach to investigate the major challenges faced by the automative sector. The review examines the limitations and risks associated with current technologies and the most promising solutions devised by the researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T16:41:18Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Overview and Field Guide for Future Research Directions [8.012552653212687]
  This study sheds light on the development of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approaches for autonomous driving. First, we provide a thorough overview of the state-of-the-art and emerging approaches for XAI-based autonomous driving. We then propose a conceptual framework that considers the essential elements for explainable end-to-end autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T22:51:37Z)
• Inspect, Understand, Overcome: A Survey of Practical Methods for AI Safety [54.478842696269304]
  The use of deep neural networks (DNNs) in safety-critical applications is challenging due to numerous model-inherent shortcomings. In recent years, a zoo of state-of-the-art techniques aiming to address these safety concerns has emerged. Our paper addresses both machine learning experts and safety engineers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-29T09:54:54Z)
• Explanations in Autonomous Driving: A Survey [7.353589916907923]
  We provide a comprehensive survey of the existing work in explainable autonomous driving. We identify and categorise the different stakeholders involved in the development, use, and regulation of AVs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-09T00:31:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.