Social Bots and Social Media Manipulation in 2020: The Year in Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.08436v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:18:59 GMT
• Title: Social Bots and Social Media Manipulation in 2020: The Year in Review
• Authors: Ho-Chun Herbert Chang, Emily Chen, Meiqing Zhang, Goran Muric, Emilio Ferrara
• Abstract summary: The year 2020 will be remembered for two events of global significance: the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. We have three primary objectives when combining computational research and social science research. We characterize the role of social bots in social media manipulation around the discourse on the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
• Score: 11.589831677050094
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The year 2020 will be remembered for two events of global significance: the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. In this chapter, we summarize recent studies using large public Twitter data sets on these issues. We have three primary objectives. First, we delineate epistemological and practical considerations when combining the traditions of computational research and social science research. A sensible balance should be struck when the stakes are high between advancing social theory and concrete, timely reporting of ongoing events. We additionally comment on the computational challenges of gleaning insight from large amounts of social media data. Second, we characterize the role of social bots in social media manipulation around the discourse on the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. Third, we compare results from 2020 to prior years to note that, although bot accounts still contribute to the emergence of echo-chambers, there is a transition from state-sponsored campaigns to domestically emergent sources of distortion. Furthermore, issues of public health can be confounded by political orientation, especially from localized communities of actors who spread misinformation. We conclude that automation and social media manipulation pose issues to a healthy and democratic discourse, precisely because they distort representation of pluralism within the public sphere.

Related papers

• Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican legislative election [55.41644538483948]
  We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day. We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z)
• #Secim2023: First Public Dataset for Studying Turkish General Election [2.9080451420355344]
  Secim2023 is a comprehensive dataset for social media researchers to study the upcoming Turkish election. We provide tools to prevent online manipulation, and gather novel information to inform the public. Using the Secim2023 dataset, researchers can examine the social and communication networks between political actors, track current trends, and investigate emerging threats to election integrity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-22T11:42:32Z)
• Neural Theory-of-Mind? On the Limits of Social Intelligence in Large LMs [77.88043871260466]
  We show that one of today's largest language models lacks this kind of social intelligence out-of-the box. We conclude that person-centric NLP approaches might be more effective towards neural Theory of Mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T14:58:58Z)
• Demographic Confounding Causes Extreme Instances of Lifestyle Politics on Facebook [73.37786708074361]
  We find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity. The most liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and conservative commentators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T16:48:00Z)
• Identification of Twitter Bots based on an Explainable ML Framework: the US 2020 Elections Case Study [72.61531092316092]
  This paper focuses on the design of a novel system for identifying Twitter bots based on labeled Twitter data. Supervised machine learning (ML) framework is adopted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Our study also deploys Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for explaining the ML model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T14:12:24Z)
• A Study on Herd Behavior Using Sentiment Analysis in Online Social Network [1.5673338088641469]
  This paper represents and analyze the capacity of diverse strategies to predict critical opinions from online social networking sites. Social media becomes a good outlet since the last decades to share the opinions globally. This study demonstrates the evaluation of sentiment analysis techniques using social media contents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-25T05:22:35Z)
• Narratives and Needs: Analyzing Experiences of Cyclone Amphan Using Twitter Discourse [0.0]
  Social media is receiving increasing attention as a rich data source for understanding people's social, political and economic experiences of extreme weather events. In this paper, we contribute two novel methodologies that leverage Twitter discourse to characterize narratives and identify unmet needs in response to Cyclone Amphan.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-11T17:49:05Z)
• Inferring Political Preferences from Twitter [0.0]
  Political Sentiment Analysis of social media helps the political strategists to scrutinize the performance of a party or candidate. During the time of elections, the social networks get flooded with blogs, chats, debates and discussions about the prospects of political parties and politicians. In this work, we chose to identify the inclination of political opinions present in Tweets by modelling it as a text classification problem using classical machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-21T05:20:43Z)
• A Decade of Social Bot Detection [0.9137554315375922]
  In the aftermath of the 2016 US elections, the world started to realize the gravity of widespread deception in social media. What strategies should we enforce in order to stop this social bot pandemic? What stroke social, political and economic analysts after 2016, deception and automation, has been however a matter of study for computer scientists since at least 2010.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T13:46:38Z)
• The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the General Public to the COVID-19 Pandemic [66.80677233314002]
  Pandemic of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented governments with ultimate challenges. In the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President. This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society by mining people's opinions on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T13:02:38Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.