Designing Explanations for Group Recommender Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.12413v1
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:05:39 GMT
- Title: Designing Explanations for Group Recommender Systems
- Authors: A. Felfernig and N. Tintarev and T.N.T. Trang and M. Stettinger
- Abstract summary: Explanations are used in recommender systems for various reasons.
Developers of recommender systems want to convince users to purchase specific items.
Users should better understand how the recommender system works and why a specific item has been recommended.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Explanations are used in recommender systems for various reasons. Users have
to be supported in making (high-quality) decisions more quickly. Developers of
recommender systems want to convince users to purchase specific items. Users
should better understand how the recommender system works and why a specific
item has been recommended. Users should also develop a more in-depth
understanding of the item domain. Consequently, explanations are designed in
order to achieve specific \emph{goals} such as increasing the transparency of a
recommendation or increasing a user's trust in the recommender system. In this
paper, we provide an overview of existing research related to explanations in
recommender systems, and specifically discuss aspects relevant to group
recommendation scenarios. In this context, we present different ways of
explaining and visualizing recommendations determined on the basis of
preference aggregation strategies.
Related papers
- Post-Userist Recommender Systems : A Manifesto [1.7157586976839874]
We define userist recommendation as an approach to recommender systems framed solely in terms of the relation between the user and system.
Post-userist recommendation posits a larger field of relations in which stakeholders are embedded and distinguishes the recommendation function from generative media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T03:16:37Z) - RecRec: Algorithmic Recourse for Recommender Systems [41.97186998947909]
It is crucial for all stakeholders to understand the model's rationale behind making certain predictions and recommendations.
This is especially true for the content providers whose livelihoods depend on the recommender system.
We propose a recourse framework for recommender systems, targeted towards the content providers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-28T22:26:50Z) - User-Controllable Recommendation via Counterfactual Retrospective and
Prospective Explanations [96.45414741693119]
We present a user-controllable recommender system that seamlessly integrates explainability and controllability.
By providing both retrospective and prospective explanations through counterfactual reasoning, users can customize their control over the system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-02T01:13:36Z) - Visualization for Recommendation Explainability: A Survey and New Perspectives [0.0]
We systematically review the literature on explanations in recommender systems based on four dimensions.
We derive a set of guidelines that might be constructive for designing explanatory visualizations in recommender systems.
The aim of this review is to help recommendation researchers and practitioners better understand the potential of visually explainable recommendation research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T15:42:00Z) - Breaking Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems with Causal Inference [99.22185950608838]
Recent work has shown that feedback loops may compromise recommendation quality and homogenize user behavior.
We propose the Causal Adjustment for Feedback Loops (CAFL), an algorithm that provably breaks feedback loops using causal inference.
We show that CAFL improves recommendation quality when compared to prior correction methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-04T17:58:39Z) - A Review on Pushing the Limits of Baseline Recommendation Systems with
the integration of Opinion Mining & Information Retrieval Techniques [0.0]
Recommendation Systems allow users to identify trending items among a community while being timely and relevant to the user's expectations.
Deep Learning methods have been brought forward to achieve better quality recommendations.
Researchers have tried to expand on the capabilities of standard recommendation systems to provide the most effective recommendations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-03T22:13:33Z) - Explainability in Music Recommender Systems [69.0506502017444]
We discuss how explainability can be addressed in the context of Music Recommender Systems (MRSs)
MRSs are often quite complex and optimized for recommendation accuracy.
We show how explainability components can be integrated within a MRS and in what form explanations can be provided.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-25T18:32:11Z) - Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs [73.81994676695346]
We analyze different groups of users according to their level of activity, and find that bias exists in recommendation performance between different groups.
We show that inactive users may be more susceptible to receiving unsatisfactory recommendations, due to insufficient training data for the inactive users.
We propose a fairness constrained approach via re-ranking to mitigate this problem in the context of explainable recommendation over knowledge graphs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T05:04:38Z) - Survey for Trust-aware Recommender Systems: A Deep Learning Perspective [48.2733163413522]
It becomes critical to embrace a trustworthy recommender system.
This survey provides a systemic summary of three categories of trust-aware recommender systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-08T02:11:55Z) - A Survey on Knowledge Graph-Based Recommender Systems [65.50486149662564]
We conduct a systematical survey of knowledge graph-based recommender systems.
We focus on how the papers utilize the knowledge graph for accurate and explainable recommendation.
We introduce datasets used in these works.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-28T02:26:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.