Reflections on the Clinical Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.01149v1
• Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:34:09 GMT
• Title: Reflections on the Clinical Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence
• Authors: Jens Schneider, Marco Agus
• Abstract summary: This chapter reflects on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its acceptance in clinical environments. We develop a general view of hindrances for clinical acceptance in the form of a pipeline model combining AI and clinical practise.
• Score: 15.594759364908235
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this chapter, we reflect on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its acceptance in clinical environments. We develop a general view of hindrances for clinical acceptance in the form of a pipeline model combining AI and clinical practise. We then link each challenge to the relevant stage in the pipeline and discuss the necessary requirements in order to overcome each challenge. We complement this discussion with an overview of opportunities for AI, which we currently see at the periphery of clinical workflows.

Related papers

• Revolutionizing Clinical Trials: A Manifesto for AI-Driven Transformation [28.619499555811363]
  This manifesto represents a collaborative vision forged by leaders in pharmaceuticals, consulting firms, clinical research, and AI.<n>It outlines a roadmap for two AI technologies - causal inference and digital twins - to transform clinical trials, delivering faster, safer, and more personalized outcomes for patients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T15:45:19Z)
• Designing AI Tools for Clinical Care Teams to Support Serious Illness Conversations with Older Adults in the Emergency Department [53.52248484568777]
  The work contributes empirical understanding of ED-based serious illness conversations and provides design considerations for AI in high-stakes clinical environments.<n>We conducted interviews with two domain experts and nine ED clinical care team members.<n>We characterized a four-phase serious illness conversation workflow (identification, preparation, conduction, documentation) and identified key needs and challenges at each stage.<n>We present design guidelines for AI tools supporting SIC that fit within existing clinical practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T21:15:57Z)
• Medchain: Bridging the Gap Between LLM Agents and Clinical Practice through Interactive Sequential Benchmarking [58.25862290294702]
  We present MedChain, a dataset of 12,163 clinical cases that covers five key stages of clinical workflow. We also propose MedChain-Agent, an AI system that integrates a feedback mechanism and a MCase-RAG module to learn from previous cases and adapt its responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T15:25:02Z)
• Clinicians' Voice: Fundamental Considerations for XAI in Healthcare [0.0]
  We conduct semi-structured interviews with clinicians to discuss their thoughts, hopes, and concerns. We find that clinicians generally think positively about developing AI-based tools for clinical practice. They have concerns about how these will fit into their workflow and how it will impact clinician-patient relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T16:47:06Z)
• Clinical Evaluation of Medical Image Synthesis: A Case Study in Wireless Capsule Endoscopy [63.39037092484374]
  This study focuses on the clinical evaluation of medical Synthetic Data Generation using Artificial Intelligence (AI) models. The paper contributes by a) presenting a protocol for the systematic evaluation of synthetic images by medical experts and b) applying it to assess TIDE-II, a novel variational autoencoder-based model for high-resolution WCE image synthesis. The results show that TIDE-II generates clinically relevant WCE images, helping to address data scarcity and enhance diagnostic tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T19:48:50Z)
• A Tutorial on Clinical Speech AI Development: From Data Collection to Model Validation [19.367198670893778]
  This tutorial paper provides an overview of the key components required for robust development of clinical speech AI. The goal is to provide comprehensive guidance on building models whose inputs and outputs link to the more interpretable and clinically meaningful aspects of speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T00:58:15Z)
• Artificial intelligence techniques in inherited retinal diseases: A review [19.107474958408847]
  Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a diverse group of genetic disorders that lead to progressive vision loss and are a major cause of blindness in working-age adults. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising solutions to these challenges. This review consolidates existing studies, identifies gaps, and provides an overview of AI's potential in diagnosing and managing IRDs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T03:14:51Z)
• Dr-LLaVA: Visual Instruction Tuning with Symbolic Clinical Grounding [53.629132242389716]
  Vision-Language Models (VLM) can support clinicians by analyzing medical images and engaging in natural language interactions. VLMs often exhibit "hallucinogenic" behavior, generating textual outputs not grounded in contextual multimodal information. We propose a new alignment algorithm that uses symbolic representations of clinical reasoning to ground VLMs in medical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T23:19:28Z)
• AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
  We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs. This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios. We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z)
• Exploring the Role of Explainability in AI-Assisted Embryo Selection [0.0]
  In Vitro Fertilization is among the most widespread treatments for infertility. One of its main challenges is the evaluation and selection of embryo for implantation. Deep learning based methods are gaining attention, but their opaque nature compromises their acceptance in the clinical context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T09:46:31Z)
• Towards clinical AI fairness: A translational perspective [13.061383127966872]
  We discuss the misalignment between technical and clinical perspectives of AI fairness. We advocate multidisciplinary collaboration to bridge the knowledge gap, and provide possible solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-26T12:38:40Z)
• Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
  We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state. We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability. Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z)
• Robotic Navigation Autonomy for Subretinal Injection via Intelligent Real-Time Virtual iOCT Volume Slicing [88.99939660183881]
  We propose a framework for autonomous robotic navigation for subretinal injection. Our method consists of an instrument pose estimation method, an online registration between the robotic and the i OCT system, and trajectory planning tailored for navigation to an injection target. Our experiments on ex-vivo porcine eyes demonstrate the precision and repeatability of the method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-17T21:41:21Z)
• VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features, Explanations, and Data for Healthcare Models [85.4333256782337]
  VBridge is a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates machine learning explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow. We identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence. We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T17:34:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.