Learning to Predict with Supporting Evidence: Applications to Clinical Risk Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.02768v1
• Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 00:26:32 GMT
• Title: Learning to Predict with Supporting Evidence: Applications to Clinical Risk Prediction
• Authors: Aniruddh Raghu, John Guttag, Katherine Young, Eugene Pomerantsev, Adrian V. Dalca, Collin M. Stultz
• Abstract summary: The impact of machine learning models on healthcare will depend on the degree of trust that healthcare professionals place in the predictions made by these models. We present a method to provide people with clinical expertise with domain-relevant evidence about why a prediction should be trusted.
• Score: 9.199022926064009
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The impact of machine learning models on healthcare will depend on the degree of trust that healthcare professionals place in the predictions made by these models. In this paper, we present a method to provide people with clinical expertise with domain-relevant evidence about why a prediction should be trusted. We first design a probabilistic model that relates meaningful latent concepts to prediction targets and observed data. Inference of latent variables in this model corresponds to both making a prediction and providing supporting evidence for that prediction. We present a two-step process to efficiently approximate inference: (i) estimating model parameters using variational learning, and (ii) approximating maximum a posteriori estimation of latent variables in the model using a neural network, trained with an objective derived from the probabilistic model. We demonstrate the method on the task of predicting mortality risk for patients with cardiovascular disease. Specifically, using electrocardiogram and tabular data as input, we show that our approach provides appropriate domain-relevant supporting evidence for accurate predictions.

Related papers

• Ethical considerations of use of hold-out sets in clinical prediction model management [0.4194295877935868]
  We focus on the ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice. We also discuss statistical issues arising from different hold-out set sampling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T11:42:46Z)
• MedDiffusion: Boosting Health Risk Prediction via Diffusion-based Data Augmentation [58.93221876843639]
  This paper introduces a novel, end-to-end diffusion-based risk prediction model, named MedDiffusion. It enhances risk prediction performance by creating synthetic patient data during training to enlarge sample space. It discerns hidden relationships between patient visits using a step-wise attention mechanism, enabling the model to automatically retain the most vital information for generating high-quality data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T01:36:30Z)
• Clinical outcome prediction under hypothetical interventions -- a representation learning framework for counterfactual reasoning [31.97813934144506]
  We introduce a new representation learning framework, which considers the provision of counterfactual explanations as an embedded property of the risk model. Our results suggest that our proposed framework has the potential to help researchers and clinicians improve personalised care.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-15T09:41:16Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
  Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions. Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations. We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
• A scoping review of causal methods enabling predictions under hypothetical interventions [4.801185839732629]
  When prediction models are used to support decision making, there is often a need for predicting outcomes under hypothetical interventions. We systematically reviewed literature published by December 2019, considering papers in the health domain that used causal considerations to enable prediction models to be used for predictions under hypothetical interventions. There exist two broad methodological approaches for allowing prediction under hypothetical intervention into clinical prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T13:36:26Z)
• Patient-independent Epileptic Seizure Prediction using Deep Learning Models [39.19336481493405]
  The purpose of a seizure prediction system is to successfully identify the pre-ictal brain stage, which occurs before a seizure event. Patient-independent seizure prediction models are designed to offer accurate performance across multiple subjects within a dataset. We propose two patient-independent deep learning architectures with different learning strategies that can learn a global function utilizing data from multiple subjects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-18T23:13:48Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)
• Double Robust Representation Learning for Counterfactual Prediction [68.78210173955001]
  We propose a novel scalable method to learn double-robust representations for counterfactual predictions. We make robust and efficient counterfactual predictions for both individual and average treatment effects. The algorithm shows competitive performance with the state-of-the-art on real world and synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:39:26Z)
• Uncertainty estimation for classification and risk prediction on medical tabular data [0.0]
  This work advances the understanding of uncertainty estimation for classification and risk prediction on medical data. In a data-scarce field such as healthcare, the ability to measure the uncertainty of a model's prediction could potentially lead to improved effectiveness of decision support tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-13T08:46:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.