An unorthodox view on quantum mechanics
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.03179v1
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:12:14 GMT
- Title: An unorthodox view on quantum mechanics
- Authors: Gerard 't Hooft
- Abstract summary: Quantum mechanics is a description of the sub-microscopic world that is profoundly different from what is often asserted.
Author's opinion on the interpretation of quantum mechanics is further elucidated.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The author's opinion on the interpretation of quantum mechanics is further
elucidated. Not only may quantum mechanics be a description of the
sub-microscopic world that is profoundly different from what is often asserted,
particularly concerning 'what is really going on', but questions such as these
may well be essential for finding new ways of constructing models beyond what
is now called the Standard Model of the sub-atomic particles.
Related papers
- Classical Many-Worlds Interpretation [0.0]
I present a simple baby-steps reconstruction of quantum mechanics as a fully classical theory.
Despite its simplicity and minimalism of radical concepts, this is not a toy model, being equivalent with quantum field theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T18:13:41Z) - Bohr and von Neumann on the Universality of Quantum Mechanics: Materials for the History of the Quantum Measurement Process [0.0]
The Bohr and von Neumann views on the measurement process in quantum mechanics have been interpreted for a long time in somewhat controversial terms.
I would like to show that, contrary to a widespread opinion, their views should be taken less inconsistent, and much closer to each other, than usually thought.
I claim that Bohr and von Neumann are conceptually on the same side on the issue of the universality of quantum mechanics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-13T13:04:22Z) - Antiparticles in non-relativistic quantum mechanics [55.2480439325792]
Non-relativistic quantum mechanics was originally formulated to describe particles.
We show how the concept of antiparticles can and should be introduced in the non-relativistic case without appealing to quantum field theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T09:16:18Z) - Postulating the Unicity of the Macroscopic Physical World [0.0]
We argue that the unicity of the macroscopic world is a fundamental postulate of physics, rather than an issue that must be mathematically justified or demonstrated.
This is made possible by using general operator algebras to extend the mathematical description of the physical world towards macroscopic systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T19:21:36Z) - A new interpretation of quantum theory, based on a bundle-theoretic view
of objective idealism [0.0]
The 'weirdness' of quantum theory can be understood to derive from a vanishing distinguishability of indiscernible particles.
The claim is made that quantum theory can be interpreted in an intelligible way by positing a bundle-theoretic view of objective idealism instead of materialism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-22T12:15:04Z) - Completing the quantum ontology with the electromagnetic zero-point
field [0.0]
This text begins with a series of critical considerations on the initial interpretation of quantum phenomena observed in atomic systems.
Arguments are given in favour of the random zero-point radiation field (ZPF) as the element needed to complete the quantum process.
The permanent presence of the field drastically affects the dynamics of the particle, which eventually falls under the control of the field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-13T23:11:48Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same.
Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles.
We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z) - From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover.
The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z) - Quantum Hall phase emerging in an array of atoms interacting with
photons [101.18253437732933]
Topological quantum phases underpin many concepts of modern physics.
Here, we reveal that the quantum Hall phase with topological edge states, spectral Landau levels and Hofstadter butterfly can emerge in a simple quantum system.
Such systems, arrays of two-level atoms (qubits) coupled to light being described by the classical Dicke model, have recently been realized in experiments with cold atoms and superconducting qubits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-18T14:56:39Z) - Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations.
We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.