Skilled and Mobile: Survey Evidence of AI Researchers' Immigration Preferences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.07237v2
• Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 15:36:44 GMT
• Title: Skilled and Mobile: Survey Evidence of AI Researchers' Immigration Preferences
• Authors: Remco Zwetsloot, Baobao Zhang, Noemi Dreksler, Lauren Kahn, Markus Anderljung, Allan Dafoe, Michael C. Horowitz
• Abstract summary: The U.S. is the most popular destination for AI researchers, followed by the U.K., Canada, Switzerland, and France. Visa and immigration difficulties were perceived to be a particular impediment to conducting AI research in the U.S., the U.K., and Canada.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Countries, companies, and universities are increasingly competing over top-tier artificial intelligence (AI) researchers. Where are these researchers likely to immigrate and what affects their immigration decisions? We conducted a survey $(n = 524)$ of the immigration preferences and motivations of researchers that had papers accepted at one of two prestigious AI conferences: the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) and the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). We find that the U.S. is the most popular destination for AI researchers, followed by the U.K., Canada, Switzerland, and France. A country's professional opportunities stood out as the most common factor that influences immigration decisions of AI researchers, followed by lifestyle and culture, the political climate, and personal relations. The destination country's immigration policies were important to just under half of the researchers surveyed, while around a quarter noted current immigration difficulties to be a deciding factor. Visa and immigration difficulties were perceived to be a particular impediment to conducting AI research in the U.S., the U.K., and Canada. Implications of the findings for the future of AI talent policies and governance are discussed.

Related papers

• AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
  Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities. The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z)
• Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 [73.06361680847708]
  In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI, but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI (many in computer science), but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times. We conclude that the context of the current surge appears different, and that interdisciplinary AI application is likely to be sustained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T14:08:07Z)
• China and the U.S. produce more impactful AI research when collaborating together [5.227075179857056]
  We analyze a dataset of over 350,000 AI scientists and 5,000,000 AI papers. We find that since the year 2000, China and the U.S. have been leading the field in terms of impact, novelty, productivity, and workforce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T16:47:51Z)
• Forecasting AI Progress: Evidence from a Survey of Machine Learning Researchers [0.0]
  We report the results from a large survey of AI and machine learning (ML) researchers on their beliefs about progress in AI. In aggregate, AI/ML researchers surveyed placed a 50% likelihood of human-level machine intelligence being achieved by 2060. Forecasts of several near-term AI milestones have reduced in time, suggesting more optimism about AI progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T19:05:12Z)
• How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AI [75.40051547428592]
  Private companies, public sector organizations, and academic groups have outlined ethical values they consider important for responsible AI technologies. While their recommendations converge on a set of central values, little is known about the values a more representative public would find important for the AI technologies they interact with and might be affected by. We conducted a survey examining how individuals perceive and prioritize responsible AI values across three groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-16T14:39:37Z)
• Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
  It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective. Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research. This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from a Survey of Machine Learning Researchers [0.0]
  Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) researchers play an important role in the ethics and governance of AI. We conducted a survey of those who published in the top AI/ML conferences. We find that AI/ML researchers place high levels of trust in international organizations and scientific organizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-05T15:23:12Z)
• My Boss the Computer: A Bayesian analysis of socio-demographic and cross-cultural determinants of attitude toward the Non-Human Resource Management [0.0]
  This study collects a cross-sectional dataset of 1,015 survey responses of international students from 48 countries and 8 regions worldwide. A majority of the respondents (52%) are concerned about being managed by AI. We find having a higher income, being male, majoring in business, and/or self-rated familiarity with AI correlate with a more positive view of emotional AI in the workplace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T09:53:12Z)
• A narrowing of AI research? [0.0]
  We study the evolution of the thematic diversity of AI research in academia and the private sector. We measure the influence of private companies in AI research through the citations they receive and their collaborations with other institutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-22T08:23:56Z)
• Brain Drain and Brain Gain in Russia: Analyzing International Migration of Researchers by Discipline using Scopus Bibliometric Data 1996-2020 [77.34726150561087]
  We analyze all researchers who have published with a Russian affiliation address in Scopus-indexed sources in 1996-2020. While Russia was a donor country in the late 1990s and early 2000s, it has experienced a relatively balanced circulation of researchers in more recent years. Overall, researchers emigrating from Russia outnumbered and outperformed researchers immigrating to Russia.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-07T12:47:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.