Unitary Interactions Do Not Yield Outcomes: Attempting to Model
"Wigner's Friend"
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01773v3
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 04:33:38 GMT
- Title: Unitary Interactions Do Not Yield Outcomes: Attempting to Model
"Wigner's Friend"
- Authors: R. E. Kastner
- Abstract summary: An experiment by Proietti it et al purporting to instantiate the Wigner's Friend' thought experiment is discussed.
It is pointed out that the stated implications of the experiment regarding the alleged irreconcilability of facts attributed to different observers warrant critical review.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: An experiment by Proietti {\it et al} purporting to instantiate the `Wigner's
Friend' thought experiment is discussed. It is pointed out that the stated
implications of the experiment regarding the alleged irreconcilability of facts
attributed to different observers warrant critical review. In particular,
violation of a Clauser-Horne-Shimony inequality by the experimental data
actually shows that the attribution of measurement outcomes to the ``Friends''
(modeled by internal photons undergoing unitary interactions) is erroneous. An
elementary but often overlooked result regarding improper mixtures is adduced
in support of this assessment. A counterexample is provided which refutes the
popular notion that quantum theory leads to `relative facts' that never
manifest as empirical inconsistencies. It is further noted that under an
assumption of unbroken unitarity, no measurement correlation can ever yield an
outcome, since all systems remain in improper mixtures, and attributing a
definite but unknown outcome contradicts their composite pure state. It is
pointed out that there already exists a solution to this conundrum in the form
of an alternative formulation of quantum theory, which accounts for the data
showing that no outcomes occurred at the interior entangled photon level and
also predicts that outcomes can and do occur at the exterior ``super-observer''
level in this type of experiment.
Related papers
- Conventional Quantum Theory Does Not Support A Coherent Relational Account [0.0]
Quantum theory in conventional formulation is notoriously subject to various measurement-related paradoxes.
Inconsistencies concerning the outcomes of measurements can be revealed among observers.
implications for the debate concerning the viability of quantum theory in its various formulations are discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T05:35:32Z) - Measuring the Evolution of Entanglement in Compton Scattering [101.11630543545151]
The behavior of quantum entanglement during scattering is identical to the behavior of initially classically correlated photons up to a constant factor equal to two.
Our dedicated experiment with photons confirms these results and explains the "Puzzle of Decoherence" observed recently.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T14:21:23Z) - Uncertain Evidence in Probabilistic Models and Stochastic Simulators [80.40110074847527]
We consider the problem of performing Bayesian inference in probabilistic models where observations are accompanied by uncertainty, referred to as uncertain evidence'
We explore how to interpret uncertain evidence, and by extension the importance of proper interpretation as it pertains to inference about latent variables.
We devise concrete guidelines on how to account for uncertain evidence and we provide new insights, particularly regarding consistency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-21T20:32:59Z) - Entanglement of annihilation photons [141.5628276096321]
We present the results of a new experimental study of the quantum entanglement of photon pairs produced in positron-electron annihilation at rest.
Despite numerous measurements, there is still no experimental proof of the entanglement of photons.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-14T08:21:55Z) - What's the Harm? Sharp Bounds on the Fraction Negatively Affected by
Treatment [58.442274475425144]
We develop a robust inference algorithm that is efficient almost regardless of how and how fast these functions are learned.
We demonstrate our method in simulation studies and in a case study of career counseling for the unemployed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-20T17:36:33Z) - Events in quantum mechanics are maximally non-absolute [0.9176056742068814]
We prove that quantum correlations can be maximally non-absolute according to both quantifiers.
We show that chained Bell inequalities (and relaxations thereof) are also valid constraints for Wigner's experiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-19T21:15:16Z) - On the objectivity of measurement outcomes [0.0]
Recent arguments, involving entangled systems shared by sets of Wigner's friend arrangements, allegedly show that the assumption that the experiments performed by the friends yield definite outcomes, is incompatible with quantum predictions.
I show that these arguments depend upon a mistaken assumption, regarding the ("mixed") correlations between the results of the friends and those of "the Wigners", which leads to invalid predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-14T21:54:41Z) - Nested Counterfactual Identification from Arbitrary Surrogate
Experiments [95.48089725859298]
We study the identification of nested counterfactuals from an arbitrary combination of observations and experiments.
Specifically, we prove the counterfactual unnesting theorem (CUT), which allows one to map arbitrary nested counterfactuals to unnested ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T12:51:04Z) - Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world.
We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z) - Witnessing Entanglement in Experiments with Correlated Noise [1.1246250197597698]
We propose two methods to analyze witness experiments where the states can be subject to arbitrarily correlated noise.
The first method is a rejection experiment, in which we certify the creation of entanglement by rejecting the hypothesis that the experiment can only produce separable states.
The second method is an estimation experiment, in which we estimate and construct confidence intervals for the average witness value.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T19:23:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.