On the objectivity of measurement outcomes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.07743v2
• Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:00:43 GMT
• Title: On the objectivity of measurement outcomes
• Authors: Elias Okon
• Abstract summary: Recent arguments, involving entangled systems shared by sets of Wigner's friend arrangements, allegedly show that the assumption that the experiments performed by the friends yield definite outcomes, is incompatible with quantum predictions. I show that these arguments depend upon a mistaken assumption, regarding the ("mixed") correlations between the results of the friends and those of "the Wigners", which leads to invalid predictions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent arguments, involving entangled systems shared by sets of Wigner's friend arrangements, allegedly show that the assumption that the experiments performed by the friends yield definite outcomes, is incompatible with quantum predictions. From this, it is concluded that the results of measurements cannot be thought of as being actual or objective. Here, I show that these arguments depend upon a mistaken assumption, regarding the ("mixed") correlations between the results of the friends and those of "the Wigners", which leads to invalid predictions. It is not, then, that the assumption of definite outcomes leads to trouble, but that the results derived with such an assumption are contrasted with faulty predictions. Next, I explore the more famous no-go theorems by Frauchiger and Renner and by Brukner, on which these recent arguments are motivated. Regarding the first, I show that, although it is cast in a different form, it also rests on the mistaken assumption regarding "mixed" correlations--rendering it invalid. Regarding Brukner's theorem, I point out that it depends on the quite unattractive assumption of locality, a fact that fully diminishes its force. Throughout, I illustrate my claims with explicit calculations within pilot-wave theory.

Related papers

• Causal modelling without introducing counterfactuals or abstract distributions [7.09435109588801]
  In this paper, we construe causal inference as treatment-wise predictions for finite populations where all assumptions are testable. The new framework highlights the model-dependence of causal claims as well as the difference between statistical and scientific inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T16:07:57Z)
• Conventional Quantum Theory Does Not Support A Coherent Relational Account [0.0]
  Quantum theory in conventional formulation is notoriously subject to various measurement-related paradoxes. Inconsistencies concerning the outcomes of measurements can be revealed among observers. implications for the debate concerning the viability of quantum theory in its various formulations are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T05:35:32Z)
• Measuring the Evolution of Entanglement in Compton Scattering [101.11630543545151]
  The behavior of quantum entanglement during scattering is identical to the behavior of initially classically correlated photons up to a constant factor equal to two. Our dedicated experiment with photons confirms these results and explains the "Puzzle of Decoherence" observed recently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T14:21:23Z)
• It's an Alignment, Not a Trade-off: Revisiting Bias and Variance in Deep Models [51.66015254740692]
  We show that for an ensemble of deep learning based classification models, bias and variance are emphaligned at a sample level. We study this phenomenon from two theoretical perspectives: calibration and neural collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T17:06:34Z)
• Uncertain Evidence in Probabilistic Models and Stochastic Simulators [80.40110074847527]
  We consider the problem of performing Bayesian inference in probabilistic models where observations are accompanied by uncertainty, referred to as uncertain evidence' We explore how to interpret uncertain evidence, and by extension the importance of proper interpretation as it pertains to inference about latent variables. We devise concrete guidelines on how to account for uncertain evidence and we provide new insights, particularly regarding consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-21T20:32:59Z)
• Unitary Interactions Do Not Yield Outcomes: Attempting to Model "Wigner's Friend" [0.0]
  An experiment by Proietti it et al purporting to instantiate the Wigner's Friend' thought experiment is discussed. It is pointed out that the stated implications of the experiment regarding the alleged irreconcilability of facts attributed to different observers warrant critical review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-04T21:38:41Z)
• Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap [140.98628848491146]
  We introduce deconfounding scores, which induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:50:11Z)
• Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
  We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs. We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables. We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)
• A Weaker Faithfulness Assumption based on Triple Interactions [89.59955143854556]
  We propose a weaker assumption that we call $2$-adjacency faithfulness. We propose a sound orientation rule for causal discovery that applies under weaker assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T13:04:08Z)
• A no-go theorem for the persistent reality of Wigner's friend's perception [0.0]
  We formulate a no-go theorem for the persistent reality of Wigner's friend's perception. In a Wigner's friend scenario, there is no joint probability distribution for the friend's perceived measurement outcomes at two different times. We briefly discuss which of the theorem's assumptions are more likely to be dropped within various popular interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-20T18:56:52Z)
• Unitary-Only Quantum Theory Cannot Consistently Describe the Use of Itself: On the Frauchiger-Renner Paradox [0.0]
  The Frauchiger-Renner Paradox is an extension of paradoxes based on the 'Problem of Measurement,' such as Schrodinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend. This paper discusses a basic inconsistency arising in the FR scenario at a much earlier point than the derived contradiction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-04T18:34:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.