Byzantine-Robust and Privacy-Preserving Framework for FedML

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.02295v1
• Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 19:36:21 GMT
• Title: Byzantine-Robust and Privacy-Preserving Framework for FedML
• Authors: Hanieh Hashemi, Yongqin Wang, Chuan Guo, Murali Annavaram
• Abstract summary: Federated learning has emerged as a popular paradigm for collaboratively training a model from data distributed among a set of clients. This learning setting presents two unique challenges: how to protect privacy of the clients' data during training, and how to ensure integrity of the trained model. We propose a two-pronged solution that aims to address both challenges under a single framework.
• Score: 10.124385820546014
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Federated learning has emerged as a popular paradigm for collaboratively training a model from data distributed among a set of clients. This learning setting presents, among others, two unique challenges: how to protect privacy of the clients' data during training, and how to ensure integrity of the trained model. We propose a two-pronged solution that aims to address both challenges under a single framework. First, we propose to create secure enclaves using a trusted execution environment (TEE) within the server. Each client can then encrypt their gradients and send them to verifiable enclaves. The gradients are decrypted within the enclave without the fear of privacy breaches. However, robustness check computations in a TEE are computationally prohibitive. Hence, in the second step, we perform a novel gradient encoding that enables TEEs to encode the gradients and then offloading Byzantine check computations to accelerators such as GPUs. Our proposed approach provides theoretical bounds on information leakage and offers a significant speed-up over the baseline in empirical evaluation.

Related papers

• ACCESS-FL: Agile Communication and Computation for Efficient Secure Aggregation in Stable Federated Learning Networks [26.002975401820887]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed learning framework designed for privacy-aware applications. Traditional FL approaches risk exposing sensitive client data when plain model updates are transmitted to the server. Google's Secure Aggregation (SecAgg) protocol addresses this threat by employing a double-masking technique. We propose ACCESS-FL, a communication-and-computation-efficient secure aggregation method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T09:03:38Z)
• PriRoAgg: Achieving Robust Model Aggregation with Minimum Privacy Leakage for Federated Learning [49.916365792036636]
  Federated learning (FL) has recently gained significant momentum due to its potential to leverage large-scale distributed user data. The transmitted model updates can potentially leak sensitive user information, and the lack of central control of the local training process leaves the global model susceptible to malicious manipulations on model updates. We develop a general framework PriRoAgg, utilizing Lagrange coded computing and distributed zero-knowledge proof, to execute a wide range of robust aggregation algorithms while satisfying aggregated privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T03:18:08Z)
• PROFL: A Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Method with Stringent Defense Against Poisoning Attacks [2.6487166137163007]
  Federated Learning (FL) faces two major issues: privacy leakage and poisoning attacks. We propose a novel privacy-preserving Byzantine-robust FL framework PROFL. PROFL is based on the two-trapdoor additional homomorphic encryption algorithm and blinding techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-02T06:34:37Z)
• Client-side Gradient Inversion Against Federated Learning from Poisoning [59.74484221875662]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables distributed participants to train a global model without sharing data directly to a central server. Recent studies have revealed that FL is vulnerable to gradient inversion attack (GIA), which aims to reconstruct the original training samples. We propose Client-side poisoning Gradient Inversion (CGI), which is a novel attack method that can be launched from clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T03:48:27Z)
• FheFL: Fully Homomorphic Encryption Friendly Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning with Byzantine Users [19.209830150036254]
  federated learning (FL) technique was developed to mitigate data privacy issues in the traditional machine learning paradigm. Next-generation FL architectures proposed encryption and anonymization techniques to protect the model updates from the server. This paper proposes a novel FL algorithm based on a fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T11:20:00Z)
• When approximate design for fast homomorphic computation provides differential privacy guarantees [0.08399688944263842]
  Differential privacy (DP) and cryptographic primitives are popular countermeasures against privacy attacks. In this paper, we design SHIELD, a probabilistic approximation algorithm for the argmax operator. Even if SHIELD could have other applications, we here focus on one setting and seamlessly integrate it in the SPEED collaborative training framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T09:38:01Z)
• Pre-trained Encoders in Self-Supervised Learning Improve Secure and Privacy-preserving Supervised Learning [63.45532264721498]
  Self-supervised learning is an emerging technique to pre-train encoders using unlabeled data. We perform first systematic, principled measurement study to understand whether and when a pretrained encoder can address the limitations of secure or privacy-preserving supervised learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T21:35:35Z)
• FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated Learning [66.56240101249803]
  We study how hardening benign clients can affect the global model (and the malicious clients) We propose a trigger reverse engineering based defense and show that our method can achieve improvement with guarantee robustness. Our results on eight competing SOTA defense methods show the empirical superiority of our method on both single-shot and continuous FL backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T22:24:03Z)
• Is Vertical Logistic Regression Privacy-Preserving? A Comprehensive Privacy Analysis and Beyond [57.10914865054868]
  We consider vertical logistic regression (VLR) trained with mini-batch descent gradient. We provide a comprehensive and rigorous privacy analysis of VLR in a class of open-source Federated Learning frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T05:47:30Z)
• Protecting Data from all Parties: Combining FHE and DP in Federated Learning [0.09176056742068812]
  We propose a secure framework addressing an extended threat model with respect to privacy of the training data. The proposed framework protects the privacy of the training data from all participants, namely the training data owners and an aggregating server. By means of a novel quantization operator, we prove differential privacy guarantees in a context where the noise is quantified and bounded due to the use of homomorphic encryption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-09T14:33:44Z)
• Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential Privacy [67.4471689755097]
  This paper empirically demonstrates that the clipped FedAvg can perform surprisingly well even with substantial data heterogeneity. We provide the convergence analysis of a differential private (DP) FedAvg algorithm and highlight the relationship between clipping bias and the distribution of the clients' updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T14:47:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.