Post-war Civil War Propaganda Techniques and Media Spins in Nigeria and
Journalism Practice
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07841v1
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:00:04 GMT
- Title: Post-war Civil War Propaganda Techniques and Media Spins in Nigeria and
Journalism Practice
- Authors: Bolu John Folayan, Olumide Samuel Ogunjobi, Prosper Zannu, Taiwo
Ajibolu Balofin
- Abstract summary: Spin is a form of propaganda achieved through knowingly presenting a biased interpretation of an event or issues.
This paper investigates and analyzes the different propaganda techniques and spins in the narratives of the Nigerian civil in the past five years.
Findings confirm that propaganda and spins are not limited to war time, but are actively deployed in peace time.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In public relations and political communication, a spin is a form of
propaganda achieved through knowingly presenting a biased interpretation of an
event or issues. It is also the act of presenting narratives to influence
public opinion about events, people or and ideas. In war time, various forms of
spins are employed by antagonists to push their brigades to victory and wear
out the opponents. During the Nigerian civil war, quite a number of these spins
were dominant for example GOWON (Go On With One Nigeria); On Aburi We Stand, O
Le Ku Ija Ore. Post-war years presented different spins and fifty years after
the war, different spins continue to push emerging narratives (e.g.
marginalization, restructuring. This paper investigates and analyzes the
different propaganda techniques and spins in the narratives of the Nigerian
civil in the past five years through a content analysis of three national
newspapers: The Nigerian Tribune, Daily Trust and Sun Newspapers. Findings
confirm that propaganda and spins are not limited to war time, but are actively
deployed in peace time. This development places additional challenge on
journalists to uphold the canons of balance, truth and fairness in reporting
sensitive national issues.
Related papers
- News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal
Cross-Country Perspective [49.1574468325115]
This study investigated information consumption in four European countries.
It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK.
Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-09T16:22:10Z) - Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S.
News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022.
We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs.
Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z) - Automated multilingual detection of Pro-Kremlin propaganda in newspapers
and Telegram posts [5.886782001771578]
The full-scale conflict between the Russian Federation and Ukraine generated an unprecedented amount of news articles and social media data.
This study analyses how the media affected and mirrored public opinion during the first month of the war using news articles and Telegram news channels in Ukrainian, Russian, Romanian and English.
We propose and compare two methods of multilingual automated pro-Kremlin propaganda identification, based on Transformers and linguistic features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-25T14:25:37Z) - Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases.
We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions.
Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z) - Novelty in news search: a longitudinal study of the 2020 US elections [62.997667081978825]
We analyze novelty, a measurement of new items that emerge in the top news search results.
We find more new items emerging for election related queries compared to topical or stable queries.
We argue that such imbalances affect the visibility of political candidates in news searches during electoral periods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-09T08:42:37Z) - "A Special Operation": A Quantitative Approach to Dissecting and
Comparing Different Media Ecosystems' Coverage of the Russo-Ukrainian War [5.567674129101803]
The coverage of the Russian invasion of Ukraine has varied widely between Western, Russian, and Chinese media ecosystems.
We find that while the Western press outlets have focused on the military and humanitarian aspects of the war, Russian media have focused on the purported justifications for the "special military operation"
We measure the degree to which Russian media has influenced Chinese coverage across Chinese outlets' news articles, Weibo accounts, and Twitter accounts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-06T16:04:19Z) - Tweets in Time of Conflict: A Public Dataset Tracking the Twitter
Discourse on the War Between Ukraine and Russia [14.000779544058144]
On February 24, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine. In the days that followed, reports kept flooding in from layman to news anchors of a conflict quickly escalating into war.
Russia faced immediate backlash and condemnation from the world at large.
While the war continues to contribute to an ongoing humanitarian and refugee crisis in Ukraine, a second battlefield has emerged in the online space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T20:52:02Z) - Faking Fake News for Real Fake News Detection: Propaganda-loaded
Training Data Generation [105.20743048379387]
We propose a novel framework for generating training examples informed by the known styles and strategies of human-authored propaganda.
Specifically, we perform self-critical sequence training guided by natural language inference to ensure the validity of the generated articles.
Our experimental results show that fake news detectors trained on PropaNews are better at detecting human-written disinformation by 3.62 - 7.69% F1 score on two public datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-10T14:24:19Z) - A Few Observations About State-Centric Online Propaganda [0.7106986689736826]
This paper presents a few observations about pro-Kremlin propaganda between 2015 and early 2021 with a dataset from the East Stratcom Task Force (ESTF)
Instead of focusing on misinformation and disinformation, the observations are motivated by classical propaganda research and the ongoing transformation of media systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-09T14:22:52Z) - Abolitionist Networks: Modeling Language Change in Nineteenth-Century
Activist Newspapers [14.98054985758998]
Two newspapers edited by women -- THE PROVINCIAL FREEMAN and THE LILY -- led a large number of semantic changes in our corpus.
This paper supplements recent qualitative work on the role of women in abolition's vanguard.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-12T21:26:30Z) - Viable Threat on News Reading: Generating Biased News Using Natural
Language Models [49.90665530780664]
We show that publicly available language models can reliably generate biased news content based on an input original news.
We also show that a large number of high-quality biased news articles can be generated using controllable text generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-05T16:55:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.