AI and Shared Prosperity
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.08475v1
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:37:18 GMT
- Title: AI and Shared Prosperity
- Authors: Katya Klinova and Anton Korinek
- Abstract summary: Future advances in AI that automate away human labor may have stark implications for labor markets and inequality.
This paper proposes a framework to analyze the effects of specific types of AI systems on the labor market, based on how much labor demand they will create versus displace.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Future advances in AI that automate away human labor may have stark
implications for labor markets and inequality. This paper proposes a framework
to analyze the effects of specific types of AI systems on the labor market,
based on how much labor demand they will create versus displace, while taking
into account that productivity gains also make society wealthier and thereby
contribute to additional labor demand. This analysis enables ethically-minded
companies creating or deploying AI systems as well as researchers and
policymakers to take into account the effects of their actions on labor markets
and inequality, and therefore to steer progress in AI in a direction that
advances shared prosperity and an inclusive economic future for all of
humanity.
Related papers
- Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution.
Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts.
We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z) - Exploiting the Margin: How Capitalism Fuels AI at the Expense of Minoritized Groups [0.0]
This paper explores the relationship between capitalism, racial injustice, and artificial intelligence (AI)
It argues that AI acts as a contemporary vehicle for age-old forms of exploitation.
The paper promotes an approach that integrates social justice and equity into the core of technological design and policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-10T22:40:07Z) - The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making [1.5156317247732694]
Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities.
Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems.
In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation.
In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide.
In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-16T10:37:22Z) - Brief for the Canada House of Commons Study on the Implications of
Artificial Intelligence Technologies for the Canadian Labor Force: Generative
Artificial Intelligence Shatters Models of AI and Labor [1.0878040851638]
As with past technologies, generative AI may not lead to mass unemployment.
generative AI is creative, cognitive, and potentially ubiquitous.
As AI's full set of capabilities and applications emerge, policy makers should promote workers' career adaptability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T22:58:24Z) - Applications and Societal Implications of Artificial Intelligence in
Manufacturing: A Systematic Review [0.3867363075280544]
The study finds that there is a predominantly optimistic outlook in prior literature regarding AI's impact on firms.
The paper draws analogies to historical cases and other examples to provide a contextual perspective on potential societal effects of industrial AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T07:17:37Z) - Trustworthy, responsible, ethical AI in manufacturing and supply chains:
synthesis and emerging research questions [59.34177693293227]
We explore the applicability of responsible, ethical, and trustworthy AI within the context of manufacturing.
We then use a broadened adaptation of a machine learning lifecycle to discuss, through the use of illustrative examples, how each step may result in a given AI trustworthiness concern.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T10:43:06Z) - Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time.
We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups.
If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS-TRAITS [64.77385130665128]
The aim of this workshop is to foster the exchange of insights on past and ongoing research towards effective and long-lasting collaborations between humans and robots.
We particularly focus on AI techniques required to implement autonomous and proactive interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-07T11:12:45Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - The Future of Work Is Here: Toward a Comprehensive Approach to
Artificial Intelligence and Labour [0.0]
It argues that current discussions on AI and labour focus on the deployment of these technologies in the workplace.
It recommends using existing human rights frameworks for working conditions to provide more comprehensive ethical principles and regulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-11T19:50:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.